>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Dugas
>> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 4:35 PM
>> To: Aaron Gould
>> Cc: NANOG
>> Subject: RE: NANOG 70 network diagram and upstream
>>
>> And the 4x100G. That's four times the capacity
Yeah, I was wondering about that 4x100G. is that a necessity or a "because
> we can" move?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Dugas
> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 4:35 PM
> To: Aaron Gould
> Cc: NANOG
&g
Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Dugas
> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 4:35 PM
> To: Aaron Gould
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: RE: NANOG 70 network diagram and upstream
>
> And the 4x100G. That's four times the capacity of the networ
Yeah, I was wondering about that 4x100G. is that a necessity or a "because we
can" move?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Dugas
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 4:35 PM
To: Aaron Gould
Cc: NANOG
Subject: RE: NANOG 70 network d
> On Jun 2, 2017, at 5:34 PM, Eric Dugas wrote:
>
> And the 4x100G. That's four times the capacity of the network I work for.
> ~100k subs.
Disclaimer: Not an employee of NTT, but I was last Bellevue NANOG.
Last time in Bellevue with the Comcast (dark) and Wave (dim) fiber we had 220G
with di
And the 4x100G. That's four times the capacity of the network I work for.
~100k subs.
On Jun 2, 2017 16:54, "Aaron Gould" wrote:
> Btw
>
> Wow, a ~2 million dollar boundary (dual PTX1000's) for the NANOG 70
> conference geez
>
> -aaron
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto
Btw
Wow, a ~2 million dollar boundary (dual PTX1000's) for the NANOG 70
conference geez
-aaron
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 1:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org list
Subject: NANOG 70 network diagram
7 matches
Mail list logo