Here they are on the main site:
https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG74/agenda.html
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018, 9:30 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>
>
> My slides are:
> http://tiny.cc/8rnmzy
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:44 PM Krassimir Tzvetanov
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>>
My slides are:
http://tiny.cc/8rnmzy
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:44 PM Krassimir Tzvetanov
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Here is the copy of the combined slide deck.
>
> Thanks everyone.
>
> Regards,
> Krassimir
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:54 PM Krassimir T. Tzvetanov
> wrote:
>
>> Hello
Hello Everyone,
Here is the copy of the combined slide deck.
Thanks everyone.
Regards,
Krassimir
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:54 PM Krassimir T. Tzvetanov
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I wanted to attract your attention to the Security Track this coming
> NANOG. We'll be meeting on Tuesday
Perhaps the moderator and the presenters for this track can figure out (off
list!) if there is unanimous support to record the session and reconsider.
Kind regards,
Job
of knowledge?
That's crazy.
Ryan Hamel
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Ryan Woolley
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 11:48 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:16 AM Netravnen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 14:01, John Kr
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:16 AM Netravnen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 14:01, John Kristoff wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 03:27:49 +
> > Ryan Hamel wrote:
> >
> > > Just like how all the email threads on NANOG are archived, all talks
> > > should be archived as well.
> >
> > Whether
--- karl_g...@gmx.at wrote:
From: Karl Gerhard
Most of the readers here will never attend a NANOG meeting
and a big part of those won't attend because they live on
other parts of the planet.
Yep, 21 years on the list and I still
+1
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 7:53 am Job Snijders, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Speaking as presenter in this track, I’d be fine with video recording and
> online distribution. In fact, I’d encourage it, I don’t assume any secrecy
> or confidentiality in this meeting.
>
> Perhaps for the NANOG74 meeting it is
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 14:01, John Kristoff wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 03:27:49 +
> Ryan Hamel wrote:
>
> > Just like how all the email threads on NANOG are archived, all talks
> > should be archived as well.
>
> Whether to record a session or not is up to the presenter and track
>
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 03:27:49 +
Ryan Hamel wrote:
> Just like how all the email threads on NANOG are archived, all talks
> should be archived as well.
Whether to record a session or not is up to the presenter and track
coordinator.
The security track, originally called the ISP Security BoF
Hello,
I just wanted to mention that NANOG is being read all over the world - as far
as I know this is the biggest english speaking "NOG" mailing list... in the
world. Most of the readers here will never attend a NANOG meeting and a big
part of those won't attend because they live on other
we could post our slides though, right? (I mean, per presenter, if that's
your choice?)
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:52 AM Job Snijders wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Speaking as presenter in this track, I’d be fine with video recording and
> online distribution. In fact, I’d encourage it, I don’t assume
Hi all,
Speaking as presenter in this track, I’d be fine with video recording and
online distribution. In fact, I’d encourage it, I don’t assume any secrecy
or confidentiality in this meeting.
Perhaps for the NANOG74 meeting it is too late to organize video recording,
but going forward I’m a
Agreed, especially if they’re an active member of the organization and doesn’t
seem to be synonymous with NANOGs Charter.
Jason
On Sep 30, 2018, at 22:41, Brian Kantor wrote:
>> To ensure unimpeded information sharing and discussion, the
>> Security Track will not be broadcast or recorded.
> To ensure unimpeded information sharing and discussion, the
> Security Track will not be broadcast or recorded.
I fail to understand how making the presentations secret from all
except those attending in person promotes information sharing.
Could whoever made this seemingly contradictory
Just like how all the email threads on NANOG are archived, all talks should be
archived as well.
Ryan Hamel
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Krassimir Tzvetanov
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2018 3:31 PM
To: Sam Oduor
Cc: NANOG mailing list
Subject: Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Sam
Sam,
To ensure unimpeded information sharing and discussion, the Security Track
will not be broadcast or recorded.
I apologise for the inconvenience.
Regards,
Krassimir
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 1:05 PM Sam Oduor wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any online link available for remote participation or viewing ?
>
Hi
Any online link available for remote participation or viewing ?
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 7:46 PM Krassimir Tzvetanov
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I wanted to attract your attention to the Security Track this coming
> NANOG. We'll be meeting on Tuesday morning and the line up looks like this:
Hello Everyone,
I wanted to attract your attention to the Security Track this coming NANOG.
We'll be meeting on Tuesday morning and the line up looks like this:
* Andre Toonk - examples of hijacks, other ideas
* Alexander Azimov - State of BGP Security
* David Wishnick - ARIN TAL
* Job Snijders -
19 matches
Mail list logo
