> On 13 Jul 2020, at 17:17, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:01 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/Jul/20 17:19, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alternative routes before EllaLink comes into operation would be one of the
>>> Brazil-Africa cables (one to
On 13/Jul/20 17:16, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
> Brazil-Angola cable is SACS, which for an European route would be
> paired with WACS to go from Angola to Portugal.
> Brazil-Cameroon cable is SAIL, which to get to Europe would be paired
> with ACE to go from Cameroon to Portugal or France.
WACS is
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:01 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 12/Jul/20 17:19, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>
>
> Alternative routes before EllaLink comes into operation would be one of
> the Brazil-Africa cables (one to Cameroon, the other to Angola) and then to
> Europe.
>
>
> Are you talking about
On 13/Jul/20 16:23, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> 160gbit/sec split over a standard 80ch itu dwdm grid sounds like
> 2gbit/sec per channel (although there are more efficient options than
> the standard itu grid). This sounds like it's seriously not worth it
> for today's bandwidth requirements,
On 13/Jul/20 15:41, Colin Stanners (lists) wrote:
>
> Looking at the Wikipedia article, it claims that Atlantis-2 “can
> already be upgraded with current technology to 160Gbit/s”. Would be
> interesting why that wasn’t already done on this 20-year-old cable –
> assuming that the underground
On 12/Jul/20 17:19, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>
> Alternative routes before EllaLink comes into operation would be one
> of the Brazil-Africa cables (one to Cameroon, the other to Angola) and
> then to Europe.
Are you talking about SAex?
There is SACS as well.
Mark.
On 12/Jul/20 17:05, Max Tulyev wrote:
>
>
> I see there is only one undersea cable going directly from Brazil to
> Europe. Why?
Have you ever read a C contract for a submarine cable build :-)?
Mark.
Colin Stanners (lists) wrote on 13/07/2020 14:41:
Looking at the Wikipedia article, it claims that Atlantis-2 “can
already be upgraded with current technology to 160Gbit/s”. Would be
interesting why that wasn’t already done on this 20-year-old cable –
assuming that the underground
: Nanog
Subject: Re: SaoPaolo to Frankfurt
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:06 PM Max Tulyev mailto:max...@netassist.ua> > wrote:
Hi All!
Who can provide a VLAN from SaoPaolo to Frankfurt for remote IX.BR
<http://IX.BR>
participation? Please contact me off-list.
I see there
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:06 PM Max Tulyev wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> Who can provide a VLAN from SaoPaolo to Frankfurt for remote IX.BR
> participation? Please contact me off-list.
>
> I see there is only one undersea cable going directly from Brazil to
> Europe. Why?
>
And this single cable,
10 matches
Mail list logo
