On 29 Apr 2011 (18), at 3:59 PM, Attilla de Groot wrote:
On Apr 29, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Kyle Creyts wrote:
How is this being done? I've looked at looked at PF_RING and TNAPI... is
there anything better out there?
On Apr 29, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Kyle Creyts wrote:
How is this being done? I've looked at looked at PF_RING and TNAPI... is
there anything better out there?
http://events.ccc.de/congress/2006/Fahrplan/attachments/1225-23c3-slides-av.pdf
That should give you some answers. :-)
-- Attilla
How is this being done? I've looked at looked at PF_RING and TNAPI... is
there anything better out there?
Those two (thanks to Luca) can get you most of the way there, but to
really hit the target you need dedicated kit like Endace (and a few
others) make. They basically do what was
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Michael Holstein wrote:
Those two (thanks to Luca) can get you most of the way there, but to
really hit the target you need dedicated kit like Endace (and a few
others) make. They basically do what was represented in the CCC slides
somebody else posted (FPGA with own
[mailto:michael.holst...@csuohio.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 9:44 AM
To: Kyle Creyts
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Wire-rate Packet Capture on 10gbE
How is this being done? I've looked at looked at PF_RING and TNAPI...
is there anything better out there?
Those two (thanks to Luca) can
5 matches
Mail list logo