On 10/11/2018 09:39 PM, Tom Ammon wrote:
> What did you experience with the dual-stack/CGN approach that keeps you
> from recommending it?
Nothing, sorry if my writing was confusing. It was the 464XLAT that I
don't recommend at this time, lack of vendor support by the brands we
currently use
Regards,
Philip
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Tom Ammon
Sent: Friday, 12 October 2018 2:39 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:08 PM Brock Tice wrote:
On 10/09/2018 06:24 PM, Philip Loenneker wrote:
> I have asked several vendo
Sent: Friday, 12 October 2018 2:39 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:08 PM Brock Tice
mailto:br...@bmwl.co>> wrote:
On 10/09/2018 06:24 PM, Philip Loenneker wrote:
> I have asked several vendors we deal with about the newer tec
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:08 PM Brock Tice wrote:
> On 10/09/2018 06:24 PM, Philip Loenneker wrote:
> > I have asked several vendors we deal with about the newer technologies
> > such as 464XLAT, and have had some responses indicating they will
> > investigate internally, however we have not
On 10/09/2018 06:24 PM, Philip Loenneker wrote:
> I have asked several vendors we deal with about the newer technologies
> such as 464XLAT, and have had some responses indicating they will
> investigate internally, however we have not made much progress yet. One
> vendor suggested their device
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:50 AM Philip Loenneker <
philip.loenne...@tasmanet.com.au> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>
>
> This article is now 11 months old, but may be of interest to you:
>
> https://blog.apnic.net/2017/11/09/ce-vendors-share-thoughts-ipv6-support/
>
>
>
> Some quotes:
>
>- The major
Hi Tom,
This article is now 11 months old, but may be of interest to you:
https://blog.apnic.net/2017/11/09/ce-vendors-share-thoughts-ipv6-support/
Some quotes:
* The major issue is the lack of support provided by CE vendors for both
older (DS-Lite, lw4o6), and newer (464XLAT, MAP T/E)
You may use this document, which passed already the last-call and is in the
AD/IESG review:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas/
My co-authors may help you to get those products …
I’ve been using myself OpenWRT for such deployments.
Regards,
Jordi
Tom Ammon writes:
> Are there any CPE vendors providing MAP-T features yet? I'm working on
> rolling v6 to residential subscribers and am trying to
> understand what the landscape looks like on the CPE side, for MAP-T
> specifically.
>
> What about 464XLAT on a CPE - is that a thing? I know
9 matches
Mail list logo
