Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-16 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On May 14, 2009, at 8:37 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: [TLB:] I can think of an argument they might make: that it is/could be used by bots as a fallback. However, redirecting DNS/UDP fits the model of providing a better service for the average user; blocking/redirecting TCP is more likely to

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-15 Thread John R. Levine
And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on? Anything except http; at which point everything will move to http, and the firewalls are again useless. Um, if you think that http on consumer networks is transparent, I have some really bad news for you. Regards, John

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-15 Thread Martin Hannigan
Anything traversing the edge. They are all revenue targets. Best, Martin On 5/14/09, Mark Andrews mark_andr...@isc.org wrote: In message 20090514223605.88104.qm...@simone.iecc.com, John Levine writes: Dear Sprint EVDO people, Your man-in-the-middle hijacking of UDP/53 DNS queries

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-15 Thread Mans Nilsson
Subject: Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Date: Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:10:26AM +0100 Quoting John R. Levine (jo...@iecc.com): And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on? Anything except http; at which point everything will move

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-15 Thread Owen DeLong
On May 14, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Mans Nilsson wrote: Subject: Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Date: Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:58:32AM +1000 Quoting Mark Andrews (mark_andr...@isc.org): And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped

RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-14 Thread Dave Larter
...@seastrom.com Subject: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Dear Sprint EVDO people, Your man-in-the-middle hijacking of UDP/53 DNS queries against nameservers that I choose to query from my laptop on Sprint EVDO is not appreciated. Even less appreciated is your

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-14 Thread Marshall Eubanks
ports. My answer was VNP/tunnel everything. -Original Message- From: John Levine [mailto:jo...@iecc.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 6:36 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Cc: r...@seastrom.com Subject: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Dear Sprint EVDO people

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-14 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 20090514223605.88104.qm...@simone.iecc.com, John Levine writes: Dear Sprint EVDO people, Your man-in-the-middle hijacking of UDP/53 DNS queries against nameservers that I choose to query from my laptop on Sprint EVDO is not appreciated. Even less appreciated is your complete

RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-14 Thread Tomas L. Byrnes
: another brick in the wall[ed garden] In message 20090514223605.88104.qm...@simone.iecc.com, John Levine writes: Dear Sprint EVDO people, Your man-in-the-middle hijacking of UDP/53 DNS queries against nameservers that I choose to query from my laptop on Sprint EVDO is not appreciated. Even less

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-14 Thread Andre Gironda
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Mark Andrews mark_andr...@isc.org wrote: If I were an ISP, and I knew that approximately 99.9% of customer queries to random name servers was malware doing fake site phishing or misconfigured PCs that will work OK and avoid a support call if they answer the DNS

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-14 Thread Mark Andrews
To: John Levine Cc: nanog@nanog.org; r...@seastrom.com Subject: Re: you're not interesting,was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] In message 20090514223605.88104.qm...@simone.iecc.com, John Levine writes: Dear Sprint EVDO people, Your man-in-the-middle hijacking of UDP/53 DNS

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

2009-05-14 Thread Mans Nilsson
Subject: Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Date: Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:58:32AM +1000 Quoting Mark Andrews (mark_andr...@isc.org): And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on? Anything except http; at which point everything