Some idiot jumpered runs that existed between 3 different buildings. That
person did not know about the 550m limit that we also follow.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 14, 2011, at 22:38, Keegan Holley keegan.hol...@sungard.com wrote:
2011/12/14 oliver rothschild orothsch...@gmail.com
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
2011/12/14 oliver rothschild orothsch...@gmail.com
How did you end up with a MM run this long? SX optics are only rated at
500 meters at best. Even with mode conditioning jumpers more the 1km is a
risk. I'm glad it held up during testing though.
, December 15, 2011 5:53 AM
To: Keegan Holley
Cc: nanog@nanog.org; oliver rothschild
Subject: Re: Range using single-mode SFPs across multi-mode fiber
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
2011/12/14 oliver rothschild orothsch...@gmail.com
How did you end up with a MM run this long? SX
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:34 PM, oliver rothschild
orothsch...@gmail.com wrote:
This is my first e-mail to the list and I hope it is not entirely
As a suggestion, could you please in the future not use a subject such as
Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 47, Issue 56 for posts. It is MUCH better to
use a
inappropriate. We are attempting to use Juniper single-mode SFPs (LX
variety) across multi-mode fiber. Standard listed distance is always
for SFPs using the appropriate type of fiber. Does anyone out there
know how much distance we are likely to get? Thanks for your help in
advance.
On 12/14/2011 3:37 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
Single mode just has a smaller core size for the smaller beam emitted by
laser vs. LED. it works although I've never done it outside of a lab (MM
is cheaper). As for the distance it theory that should come down to the
optics and your transmit
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
inappropriate. We are attempting to use Juniper single-mode SFPs (LX
variety) across multi-mode fiber. Standard listed distance is always
for SFPs using the appropriate type of fiber. Does anyone out there
know how much distance we are likely to get?
2011/12/14 Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
inappropriate. We are attempting to use Juniper single-mode SFPs (LX
variety) across multi-mode fiber. Standard listed distance is always
for SFPs using the appropriate type of fiber. Does anyone
On 15/12/11 09:54, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
inappropriate. We are attempting to use Juniper single-mode SFPs (LX
variety) across multi-mode fiber. Standard listed distance is always
for SFPs using the appropriate type of fiber. Does anyone out there
2011/12/14 Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu
On 12/14/2011 3:37 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
Single mode just has a smaller core size for the smaller beam emitted
by
laser vs. LED. it works although I've never done it outside of a lab (MM
is cheaper). As for the distance it theory that should
Thanks to all who responded to my clumsy first question (both on
matters of etiquette and technology). The group I work with (we are a
small project acting as a last mile provider) was in the midst of
deploying this solution when I posed the question. We put the single
mode Juniper SFPs (LX) on to
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:02:58PM -0500, oliver rothschild wrote:
Thanks to all who responded to my clumsy first question (both on
matters of etiquette and technology). The group I work with (we are a
small project acting as a last mile provider) was in the midst of
deploying this solution
2011/12/14 oliver rothschild orothsch...@gmail.com
Thanks to all who responded to my clumsy first question (both on
matters of etiquette and technology). The group I work with (we are a
small project acting as a last mile provider) was in the midst of
deploying this solution when I posed the
On 15/12/11 16:38, Keegan Holley wrote:
2011/12/14 oliver rothschild orothsch...@gmail.com
Thanks to all who responded to my clumsy first question (both on
matters of etiquette and technology). The group I work with (we are a
small project acting as a last mile provider) was in the midst of
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:38:47PM -0500, Keegan Holley wrote:
2011/12/14 oliver rothschild orothsch...@gmail.com
Thanks to all who responded to my clumsy first question (both on
matters of etiquette and technology). The group I work with (we are a
small project acting as a last mile
I stand corrected, but I haven't dealt much with 100BASE-FX. I was just
talking in terms of 1G/10G.
2011/12/14 Mark Foster blak...@blakjak.net
On 15/12/11 16:38, Keegan Holley wrote:
2011/12/14 oliver rothschild orothsch...@gmail.com orothsch...@gmail.com
Thanks to all who responded to
16 matches
Mail list logo
