Perhaps a dose of factual information may temper this thread.
If we are talking about ISO-3166-2 - the basis for the CCTLD delegations, then:
1_ Scotland has no say in the country code selected.
2_ ICANN has no say in the country code selected.
3_ The choice is up to an ISO committee.
See:
well, apropos to point #2, the iso3166/ma includes representatives from
ten agencies, of which a certain 501(c)(3) originally in marina del rey,
now in los angeles, is included.
however, i can't imagine staff offering an opinion of record on the subject.
ay for aye would work for me.
-e
On
On 9/17/14 8:03 AM, manning bill wrote:
Perhaps a dose of factual information may temper this thread.
If we are talking about ISO-3166-2 - the basis for the CCTLD delegations,
then:
1_ Scotland has no say in the country code selected.
This is not actually true. We have prior art on
- Original Message -
From: manning bill bmann...@isi.edu
Perhaps a dose of factual information may temper this thread.
If we are talking about ISO-3166-2 - the basis for the CCTLD
delegations, then:
1_ Scotland has no say in the country code selected.
Am I missing something, or is
4 matches
Mail list logo
