Some additional comments from Dave Taht, who does not subscribe to the
nanog list. Also note the early WiFi results, which are spectacular. Your
customers will have bufferbloat both due to the ISP, and due to the WiFi
hop that is usually between them and their home router. Unfortunately,
it's go
Just a quick clarifying reply, I have had DSL test give me an A for bufferbloat
and a C for Speed on a 75 Meg line.
On July 22, 2016 3:23:00 PM EDT, Jim Gettys wrote:
>I don't read this list continually, but do archive it; your note was
>flagged for me to comment on.
>
>On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> Den 22. jul. 2016 21.34 skrev "Jim Gettys" :
> >
> >
> > So it is entirely appropriate in my view to give even "high speed"
> > connections low grades; it's telling you that they suck under load
> > , like when your kid is downloading a v
Den 22. jul. 2016 21.34 skrev "Jim Gettys" :
>
>
> So it is entirely appropriate in my view to give even "high speed"
> connections low grades; it's telling you that they suck under load
> , like when your kid is downloading a video (or uploading one for their
> friends); your performance (e.g. we
Tykwinski
Cc: nanog list; jb; Toke Høiland-Jørgensen; Dave Taht
Subject: Re: I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was Speedtest.net
not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads)
I don't read this list continually, but do archive it; your note was flagged
for me to comment on.
O
I don't read this list continually, but do archive it; your note was
flagged for me to comment on.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Eric Tykwinski
wrote:
> This is probably for Jim Gettys directly, but I’m sure most others have
> input. I could of sworn that that there was some test made to det
.
>-Original Message-
>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Livingood,
>Jason
>Sent: July-22-16 8:33 AM
>To: Collin Anderson; Antonio Querubin
>Cc: NANOG list
>Subject: Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads
>
>And work
And work on accurate measurement of higher link speeds. ;-)
On 7/20/16, 11:42 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Collin Anderson"
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Antonio Querubin
wrote:
> Feedback: needs IPv6 connectivity and support.
>
Point well taken. The vast ma
This is probably for Jim Gettys directly, but I’m sure most others have input.
I could of sworn that that there was some test made to detect it directly on
switches and routers? Sort of like iperf, but to test bufferbloat specifically
given the OS stack which is going to have issues as well, a
On 7/21/16, 2:19 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Jay R. Ashworth"
wrote:
>- Original Message -
>> From: "Janusz Jezowicz"
>
>> Since this morning Speedtest.net is not accessible in Chrome
>> Reason:
>> https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagnostic/#url=c.speedtest.net
>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Janusz Jezowicz"
> Since this morning Speedtest.net is not accessible in Chrome
> Reason:
> https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagnostic/#url=c.speedtest.net
>
> For any ISPs/content providers linking to speedtest.net you may want to
> s
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Antonio Querubin
wrote:
> Feedback: needs IPv6 connectivity and support.
>
Point well taken. The vast majority of M-Lab sites have IPv6 connectivity,
and we have enabled it for NDT at times, but I believe there was a concern
at one point about an issue with erro
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Collin Anderson wrote:
Thanks for the mention – for what it's worth, we are testing a more
accessible interface for the web-based NDT test.
Link: https://speed.measurementlab.net/#/
Definitely interested in feedback from the NANOG community.
Feedback: needs IPv6 connect
Thanks for the mention – for what it's worth, we are testing a more
accessible interface for the web-based NDT test.
Link: https://speed.measurementlab.net/#/
Definitely interested in feedback from the NANOG community.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Ishmael Rufus wrote:
> http://www.measure
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:56 PM, David wrote:
> On 2016-07-20 12:52 PM, Jacques Latour wrote:
>
>> In that case, for Canadians, go to http://performance.cira.ca, it's
>> MLAB-NDT based and checks IPv6 and DNSSEC :-)
>>
>> 100% ad free
>>
>>
> And on the flip side, refuses to work with Safari.
>
Yup, websocket implementations across all browsers not equal
On 2016-07-20, 2:56 PM, "NANOG on behalf of David"
wrote:
>On 2016-07-20 12:52 PM, Jacques Latour wrote:
>> In that case, for Canadians, go to http://performance.cira.ca, it's
>>MLAB-NDT based and checks IPv6 and DNSSEC :-)
>>
>> 100%
On 2016-07-20 12:52 PM, Jacques Latour wrote:
In that case, for Canadians, go to http://performance.cira.ca, it's MLAB-NDT
based and checks IPv6 and DNSSEC :-)
100% ad free
And on the flip side, refuses to work with Safari.
z
>Cc: NANOG list
>Subject: Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads
>
>http://www.measurementlab.net/tools/ndt/
>
>100% ad free.
>
>On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Janusz Jezowicz
>wrote:
>
>> It seems that some users reporting the site is
Rufus
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 9:33 AM
To: Janusz Jezowicz
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads
http://www.measurementlab.net/tools/ndt/
100% ad free.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Janusz Jezowicz
wrote:
> It seems that some us
http://www.measurementlab.net/tools/ndt/
100% ad free.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Janusz Jezowicz
wrote:
> It seems that some users reporting the site is back. I am counting 6+ hours
> of outage.
>
> Alan - what you describe is something normal user will never do. When user
> sees red scr
It seems that some users reporting the site is back. I am counting 6+ hours
of outage.
Alan - what you describe is something normal user will never do. When user
sees red screen like that, he runs screaming. So in theory yes, it was
accessible, but ... wasn't.
Its hard to avoid Google nanny when
Hi,
> Since this morning Speedtest.net is not accessible in Chrome
> Reason:
> https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagnostic/#url=c.speedtest.net
someones complained about the URL based on them stupidly installing
'cleanmymac' or such?
use the non flash junk HTML5 version in
Since this morning Speedtest.net is not accessible in Chrome
Reason:
https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagnostic/#url=c.speedtest.net
For any ISPs/content providers linking to speedtest.net you may want to
swap links to a different website or host your own speed test.
e.g. N
23 matches
Mail list logo
