-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2011 06:16 PM, Fred Richards wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> In message ,
>> Fred
>> Richards writes:
>>> I ran across this link a while back, it shows, of the top 100k
>>> websites (according to Alexa), w
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message ,
> Fred
> Richards writes:
>> I ran across this link a while back, it shows, of the top 100k
>> websites (according to Alexa), which ones are IPv6 enabled:
>>
>> http://www.atoomnet.net/ipv6_enabled_popular_websites.php?complete
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 14:52 +, Tim Chown wrote:
> Which of the big boys are doing it?
Unsure of how big they are in the grand scheme, but I use Dreamhost.
They quietly started offering IPv6 on all accounts about a week ago.
-S.
Tim Chown writes:
> Which of the big boys are doing it?
Strato in Germany. They offer IPv6 for dedicated server now. I was told
that the implementation for their shared hosting (about one million
domains) is almost finished and that they also offer IPv6 for virtual
servers (problems with the ven
Oxilion, dutch based provider (AS48539), also provides cloud services based
on RHEV. They do provide IPv6 also.
See for a redhat notice about this:
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2010/oxilion.html
Their site is mostly dutch, however this one is in English also
http://oxilion.nl/virtual-
On 2/6/11 8:21 PM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
> BlueHost, which while maybe not a great quality web host, by all
> measures is a big one, not only does not support IPv6 but they denied
> my request to create a record pointing to a friend's IPv6 page
> for a domain I host there.
>
> BH, a
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 22:08:32PM -0500, Adam Rothschild wrote:
>As others have pointed out, SoftLayer is an excellent
> example of a hosting provider that Gets It on a large scale.
An excellent example of a provider that Spams on a large scale, too.
--
Henry Yen
58 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Here's one list:
> http://www.sixxs.net/wiki/IPv6_Enabled_Hosting
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Chown [mailto:t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
> Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 8:53 AM
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: Top webhoste
Here's one list:
http://www.sixxs.net/wiki/IPv6_Enabled_Hosting
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Tim Chown [mailto:t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 8:53 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Top webhosters offering v6 too?
Which of the big boys are doing it?
Tim
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On 2/6/11 7:08 PM, Adam Rothschild wrote:
>> We (voxel.net, AS 29791) offer dual-stack on all server and cloud
>> products. As others have pointed out, SoftLayer is an excellent
>> example of a hosting provider that Gets It on a large scale.
>
On 2/6/11 7:08 PM, Adam Rothschild wrote:
> We (voxel.net, AS 29791) offer dual-stack on all server and cloud
> products. As others have pointed out, SoftLayer is an excellent
> example of a hosting provider that Gets It on a large scale.
>
> Sadly, v6 support on popular "cloud-only" services is
We (voxel.net, AS 29791) offer dual-stack on all server and cloud
products. As others have pointed out, SoftLayer is an excellent
example of a hosting provider that Gets It on a large scale.
Sadly, v6 support on popular "cloud-only" services is suspiciously
absent. Terremark vCoudExpress, Savvis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2011 02:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message ,
> Fred
> Richards writes:
>> I ran across this link a while back, it shows, of the top 100k
>> websites (according to Alexa), which ones are IPv6 enabled:
>>
>> http://www.atoomnet.net/ipv6_e
In message , Fred
Richards writes:
> I ran across this link a while back, it shows, of the top 100k
> websites (according to Alexa), which ones are IPv6 enabled:
>
> http://www.atoomnet.net/ipv6_enabled_popular_websites.php?complete_list=3Dt=
> rue
And 1.5% of lookups, in the Alexa top 100
Many virtual private server companies (I have 2 BurstNET VPS servers
in Scranton and Los Angeles) will give you a /64 of IPv6 addresses.
This is always an option.
I have used both softlayer and arpnetworks. Both have v6 by default, but
only softlayer can be considered a big boy... multiple sites. Cloud and
dedicated servers ... softlayer is a class act with v6 added for free
I ran across this link a while back, it shows, of the top 100k
websites (according to Alexa), which ones are IPv6 enabled:
http://www.atoomnet.net/ipv6_enabled_popular_websites.php?complete_list=true
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Simon Leinen wrote:
> Tim Chown writes:
>> Which of the big b
Tim Chown writes:
> Which of the big boys are doing it?
Google - although there don't call themselves a web hoster, they can be
used for hosting web sites using services such as Sites or App Engine.
Both support IPv6, either using the opt-in mechanism or by using an
alternate CNAME (ghs46 instead
Which of the big boys are doing it?
Tim
19 matches
Mail list logo
