On 2/1/2014 10:40 PM, Jima wrote:
+1. Cisco calls them Twinax, HP calls them DACs. I don't know what
anyone else calls them as it hasn't come up in conversation for me.
I thought Twinax was an IBMish MILSPEC term.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
On 2/2/14, 7:30 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:40 PM, Jima wrote:
+1. Cisco calls them Twinax, HP calls them DACs. I don't know what
anyone else calls them as it hasn't come up in conversation for me.
I thought Twinax was an IBMish MILSPEC term.
twinax could refer to a specific
- Original Message -
From: joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com
I thought Twinax was an IBMish MILSPEC term.
twinax could refer to a specific technology or to the presence of dual
inner conductors e.g. in contrast to coax or triax.
Rather specifically, Twinax refers to cable with 2
These cables are most commonly known as Direct Attach Copper SFP+
On Sunday, February 2, 2014, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com javascript:;
I thought Twinax was an IBMish MILSPEC term.
twinax could refer to a
On 2/2/2014 4:03 PM, Bryan Tong wrote:
These cables are most commonly known as Direct Attach Copper SFP+
The big issue appears to be that these are not always consistently
functional crossing vendor lines (sometimes product lines within the
same vendor). There does not appear to be any
Most of the switch vendors have an official compatibility list, but I've
found that generally the most common compatibility issue is active vs passive
twinax.
Brocade edge switches and nics are normally active only, which seems to come up
a lot - because most short cables are passive unless
We've worked through the same issues with Brocade/Intel, although we found
that even though Brocade specs active only, our ICX switches don't reject
passive cables, although oddly the Intel branded passive cables show up as
UNSUPPORTED (but FCI and Molex ones from Digikey show up as the correct
7 matches
Mail list logo
