On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:58:22 -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Feb 12, 2011, at 5:55 PM, de...@visp.net.lb wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:39:59 -1000, Michael Painter wrote:
de...@visp.net.lb wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:53:14 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 2/8/2011 7:41 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenk
On Feb 12, 2011, at 11:11 42PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Your suspicion may be accurate and accidental. I rented a car in San
>> Diego the other day -- there was a sign warning that the key fob might
>> not work within 5 miles of the port -- San Diego has a major Navy base
>> -- because of interfere
> Your suspicion may be accurate and accidental. I rented a car in San
> Diego the other day -- there was a sign warning that the key fob might
> not work within 5 miles of the port -- San Diego has a major Navy base
> -- because of interference from shipboard electronics.
same time, my phone's g
On Feb 12, 2011, at 5:55 PM, de...@visp.net.lb wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:39:59 -1000, Michael Painter wrote:
>> de...@visp.net.lb wrote:
>>> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:53:14 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 2/8/2011 7:41 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> It is PLL LNB, one carrier, we are u
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:39:59 -1000, Michael Painter wrote:
de...@visp.net.lb wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:53:14 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 2/8/2011 7:41 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
It is PLL LNB, one carrier, we are using full transponder 36 Mhz.
There is
almost no other users on this sa
On Feb 12, 2011, at 4:05 41PM, de...@visp.net.lb wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:53:14 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
>> On 2/8/2011 7:41 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
>>> It is PLL LNB, one carrier, we are using full transponder 36 Mhz. There is
>>> almost no other users on this satellite (inclined
de...@visp.net.lb wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:53:14 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 2/8/2011 7:41 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
It is PLL LNB, one carrier, we are using full transponder 36 Mhz.
There is
almost no other users on this satellite (inclined more than 1.5
degree), and
other carriers
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:53:14 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 2/8/2011 7:41 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
It is PLL LNB, one carrier, we are using full transponder 36 Mhz.
There is
almost no other users on this satellite (inclined more than 1.5
degree), and
other carriers center frequency 100Mhz
On 2/8/2011 7:41 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
It is PLL LNB, one carrier, we are using full transponder 36 Mhz. There is
almost no other users on this satellite (inclined more than 1.5 degree), and
other carriers center frequency 100Mhz away.
Since no one else will, "I blame solar flares!
At 13:59 08/02/2011 +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 01:42:42 George Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
> >> Hi Denys
> >> I doubt it's intentional jamming since I've had the sa
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 15:46:31 TR Shaw wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:41:29 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:18:59 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On
On Feb 8, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:41:29 Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:18:59 Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> I try t
07, 2011 3:43 PM
To: Ryan Wilkins
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
>>
>> Hi Denys
>> I doubt it's intentional jamming since I&
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:41:29 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:18:59 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > > > I try to install C-Band bandpass filter, no effect at all, so it
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:34:58 TR Shaw wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 February 2011 01:42:42 George Herbert wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
> >>> On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
> Hi D
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:18:59 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > > I try to install C-Band bandpass filter, no effect at all, so it is
> > > in-band
> > >
> > > interference. Putting foil (yes i
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:18:59 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > I try to install C-Band bandpass filter, no effect at all, so it is
> > in-band
> >
> > interference. Putting foil (yes i try almost everything) near LNB doesn't
> > affect interferen
On Feb 8, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 01:42:42 George Herbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
>>> On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
Hi Denys
I doubt it's intentional jamming since I've had th
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> I try to install C-Band bandpass filter, no effect at all, so it is in-band
> interference. Putting foil (yes i try almost everything) near LNB doesn't
> affect interference level too.
Can you get access to some kind of spectrum analyser kit
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 01:42:42 George Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
> >> Hi Denys
> >> I doubt it's intentional jamming since I've had the same problem.
> >> Aegis radar is very high power in full r
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
>>
>> Hi Denys
>> I doubt it's intentional jamming since I've had the same problem.
>> Aegis radar is very high power in full radiate mode and as such creates
>> problems for Low Noise Ampli
On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
>
> Hi Denys
> I doubt it's intentional jamming since I've had the same problem.
> Aegis radar is very high power in full radiate mode and as such creates
> problems for Low Noise Amplifiers listening at 3.4-4.2 GHz.
> Someone needs to talk to M
Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
Hi
I'm sysadmin of Lebanese ISP.
Almost at same time i got heavy interference on few of my C-Band carriers, and
it looks like electronic warfare jamming, because i can see phase modulated,
very weak signal, but it is completely breaking almost any communications on
my
i can not ping the in-country secondries for the LB cctld. been the
same for a few days.
i visited last (northern) fall. what a beautiful country with such a
tragic layer nine.
randy
Hi
I'm sysadmin of Lebanese ISP.
Almost at same time i got heavy interference on few of my C-Band carriers, and
it looks like electronic warfare jamming, because i can see phase modulated,
very weak signal, but it is completely breaking almost any communications on
my carriers.
Strange thing,
Martin Millnert wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
Lebanon's Telecom minister is claiming that US Navy radar is blocking the
country's Internet..
http://www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/0/93A95CA1A4E42178C225782E007371AF
"The problem, however, is due to a coordi
I used to work on some of this gear. The transmitters do indeed go to 11.
If they want to talk, you won't.
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Martin Millnert wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> > Lebanon's Telecom minister is claiming that US Navy radar is blocking the
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Lebanon's Telecom minister is claiming that US Navy radar is blocking the
> country's Internet..
>
> http://www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/0/93A95CA1A4E42178C225782E007371AF
>
> "The problem, however, is due to a coordination error rel
No, it's those Radar Sharks with Frickin' lasers on their heads:
http://pokerterms.com/images/sharks-with-lasers-2.jpg
-Mike
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> On 2/6/2011 12:00 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> > Lebanon's Telecom minister is claiming that US Navy radar is blockin
On 2/6/2011 12:00 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Lebanon's Telecom minister is claiming that US Navy radar is blocking the
> country's Internet..
>
> http://www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/0/93A95CA1A4E42178C225782E007371AF
>
> "The problem, however, is due to a coordination error related to wave
On 2/5/11 9:00 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Lebanon's Telecom minister is claiming that US Navy radar is blocking the
> country's Internet..
>
> http://www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/0/93A95CA1A4E42178C225782E007371AF
Those repeaterless submarine optical systems are really impacted by
terres
Lebanon's Telecom minister is claiming that US Navy radar is blocking the
country's Internet..
http://www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/0/93A95CA1A4E42178C225782E007371AF
"The problem, however, is due to a coordination error related to waves,"
> Nahhas told OTV, adding that an investigation
32 matches
Mail list logo
