...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:19 PM
To: NANOG [nanog@nanog.org]
Subject: XO/TWC problems?
I'm seeing packet loss between XO and TWC.
206.111.2.89 seems to be the problem. Anyone else seeing similar?
@nanog.org]
Subject: XO/TWC problems?
I'm seeing packet loss between XO and TWC.
206.111.2.89 seems to be the problem. Anyone else seeing similar?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-
Greg Smythe
-Original Message-
From: Mikeal Clark [mailto:mikeal.cl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:19 PM
To: NANOG [nanog@nanog.org]
Subject: XO/TWC problems?
I'm seeing packet loss between XO and TWC.
206.111.2.89 seems to be the problem
I'm seeing packet loss between XO and TWC.
206.111.2.89 seems to be the problem. Anyone else seeing similar?
I'm seeing a problem between that IP and another XO router at 207.88.14.193
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-
Greg Smythe
-Original Message-
From: Mikeal Clark [mailto:mikeal.cl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:19 PM
To: NANOG [nanog@nanog.org]
Subject: XO/TWC problems?
I'm
at
207.88.14.193
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-
Greg Smythe
-Original Message-
From: Mikeal Clark [mailto:mikeal.cl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:19 PM
To: NANOG [nanog@nanog.org]
Subject: XO/TWC problems?
I'm seeing packet loss between XO and TWC.
206.111.2.89 seems
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:19 PM
To: NANOG [nanog@nanog.org]
Subject: XO/TWC problems?
I'm seeing packet loss between XO and TWC.
206.111.2.89 seems to be the problem. Anyone else seeing similar?
7 matches
Mail list logo