Re: antispamcloud.com (SpamExperts) forensics reports format

2020-09-09 Thread John Levine via NANOG
In article <120a24d4e0da4f2392a25a8140be2...@ex1.obs.local> you write: >We are parsing dmarc reports using parsedmarc and the forensics reports coming >from antispamcloud.com seems not to >follow the recommended reporting format (AFRF) and therefore are considered >invalid. You're right, they're

antispamcloud.com (SpamExperts) forensics reports format

2020-09-09 Thread Sébastien Riccio via NANOG
Hello, We are parsing dmarc reports using parsedmarc and the forensics reports coming from antispamcloud.com seems not to follow the recommended reporting format (AFRF) and therefore are considered invalid. Maybe is there anyone from SpamExperts in this list that could enlighten me about how w