-
*From: *"VOLKAN KIRIK"
<mailto:volki...@gmail.com>
*To: *"Rubens Kuhl"
<mailto:rube...@gmail.com>
*Cc: *nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>,
dschaef...@cogentco.com <mailto:dschaef...@cogentco.com&
gue
>>> that connectivity to the small provider is still valuable to the customers
>>> of the large provider.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022, 9:32 AM VOLKAN KIRIK wrote:
>>> the more uploading side pays each month for the excess amount.
>>>
;,
dschaef...@cogentco.com <mailto:dschaef...@cogentco.com>,
peer...@cogentco.com <mailto:peer...@cogentco.com>
*Sent: *Friday, August 19, 2022 10:22:00 AM
*Subject: *Re: cogent and henet not peering
this is 50/50 situation. nobody has to peer
org, dschaef...@cogentco.com,
peer...@cogentco.com
*Sent: *Friday, August 19, 2022 10:22:00 AM
*Subject: *Re: cogent and henet not peering
this is 50/50 situation. nobody has to peer for free.
but everyone can.
lets just say above 1:1 ratio he.net <http:
stix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX
-
*From: *"VOLKAN KIRIK"
<mailto:volki...@gmail.com>
*To: *"Rubens Kuhl" <mailto:rube...@gmail.com>
*Cc: *nanog@nanog.org, dschaef...@cogentco.com, peer...@cogentco.com
*Sent: *Friday, August 19, 2022 10:22:00 AM
*Subject: *Re: cogen
--
> *From: *"VOLKAN KIRIK"
> *To: *"Rubens Kuhl"
> *Cc: *nanog@nanog.org, dschaef...@cogentco.com, peer...@cogentco.com
> *Sent: *Friday, August 19, 2022 10:22:00 AM
> *Subject: *Re: cogent and henet not peering
>
> this is 50/50 situation. nobody has
swisp><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
*From: *"VOLKAN KIRIK"
*To: *"Rubens Kuhl"
*Cc: *nanog@nanog.org, dschaef...@cogentco.com, peer...@cogentco.com
*Sent: *Friday, August 19, 2022 10:22:00 AM
*Subject: *Re: cogent and henet not
om: *"VOLKAN KIRIK"
*To: *"Rubens Kuhl"
*Cc: *nanog@nanog.org, dschaef...@cogentco.com, peer...@cogentco.com
*Sent: *Friday, August 19, 2022 10:22:00 AM
*Subject: *Re: cogent and henet not peering
this is 50/50 situation. nobody has to peer for free.
but everyone can.
lets
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "VOLKAN KIRIK"
To: "Rubens Kuhl"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, dschaef...@cogentco.com, peer...@cogentco.com
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 10:22:00 AM
Subject:
this is 50/50 situation. nobody has to peer for free.
but everyone can.
lets just say above 1:1 ratio he.net pays their own ip transit price to
cogent for paid peering excess amount and both sides monitor traffic
we can solve this issue by becoming middlemen worldwide...
both operators are
OTOH, knowing that Cogent loves splitting the global Internet is one
good reason to not contract their services.
I think they sell traffic to their private Intranet. Which is huge,
but doesn't encompass the whole Internet.
Rubens
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 12:04 PM VOLKAN KIRIK wrote:
>
> lets
alternatively you can do this every 5 minutes..
you could write a script to get 5 minute average for both downstream and
upstream
and then equalize by rate-limiting with 5 minute delay. it would be
nearly instant and absolutely fair for both sides.
19.08.2022 18:03 tarihinde VOLKAN KIRIK
lets just say cogent gives 400GE in each pop they have in common with
he.net for free.
*BUT* they will rate-limit he.net links *to* previous month's 95th
percentile upload or download (which is minimum) rate (*each month*)
to make ratio 1:1... to make downstream and upstream traffics fair...
14 matches
Mail list logo
