> On 12 Feb 2024, at 6:01 pm, Richard Laager wrote:
>
> On 2024-02-12 15:18, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:07:52PM -0500, Geoff Huston wrote:
>>> I was making an observation that the presentation material was
>>> referring to "RPKI-Invalid" while their
> On 12 Feb 2024, at 3:14 pm, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> At NANOG 90, Merit presented on their IRRd v4 deployment. At the
> microphone Geoff Huston raised a comment which I interpreted as:
>
>"Can an exception be made for my res
On 2024-02-12 18:12, Job Snijders wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 05:01:35PM -0600, Richard Laager wrote:
On 2024-02-12 15:18, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:07:52PM -0500, Geoff Huston wrote:
I was making an observation that the presentation material was
referring to
has been transposed to IRR
data as well. For example, in 2018 RIPE NCC started using RPKI data to
untangle and cleanup the "RIPE-NONAUTH" IRR database, as per policy
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-731/ And the NTT Global IP
Network (GIN/AS2914) used the same methodology on its IR
On 2024-02-12 15:18, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:07:52PM -0500, Geoff Huston wrote:
I was making an observation that the presentation material was
referring to "RPKI-Invalid" while their implementation was using
"ROA-Invalid" There is a difference between these two
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:07:52PM -0500, Geoff Huston wrote:
> > On 12 Feb 2024, at 3:14 pm, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
> > At NANOG 90, Merit presented on their IRRd v4 deployment. At the
> > microphone Geoff Huston raised a comment which I interpreted as:
> >
Dear all,
At NANOG 90, Merit presented on their IRRd v4 deployment. At the
microphone Geoff Huston raised a comment which I interpreted as:
"Can an exception be made for my research prefixes?"
There are two sides to this:
INSERTING RPKI-invalid route/rout
o be clearer, i now run a 4GB VM with irrd2, rancid, nfsen, and a wiki.
> so i will stick with irrd2.
Are you looking for to set up just an “authoritative IRR source” (RGNET?),
or to set up an instance which mirrors all the world’s IRRs? The latter
option is quite memory heavy.
If mirrorin
I've seen recently a trend where code is optimized for run time and memory
consumption is a distant second consideration. I think this is a
side-effect of the growth of big data, where you really do have to worry
about your run time. Unfortunately this seems to have creeped into a lot
of other
; to be clearer, i now run a 4GB VM with irrd2, rancid, nfsen, and a wiki.
> so i will stick with irrd2.
Yeap, we tried installing IRRd 4 in a similar VM that used to run TC
and it was a catastrophic failure. Although it was 4.0beta2 and some
changes we are made since (IRRd4 is now at 4.2.4), I don't think they
were enough to change the outcome.
Rubens
>> It will also take much less RAM if you turn RPKI validation off.
>
> oh dear ghod. do i need to turn the dancing donkeys off too?
>
> "Make each program do one thing well. To do a new job, build afresh
> rather than complicate old programs by adding new "features"."
> -- ken thompson - unix
> It will also take much less RAM if you turn RPKI validation off.
oh dear ghod. do i need to turn the dancing donkeys off too?
"Make each program do one thing well. To do a new job, build afresh
rather than complicate old programs by adding new "features"."
-- ken thompson - unix philosophy
a
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 3:22 PM Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > At least 32GB RAM
It runs fine now with 16GB RAM, after a code change. It will also
take much less RAM if you turn RPKI validation off.
This is from TC at this moment, which mirrors 5.5 million records from
other IRRs and do RPKI
> At least 32GB RAM
> At least 4 CPU cores
> At least 150GB of disk space (SSD recommended)
h
* ra...@psg.com (Randy Bush) [Sat 18 Jun 2022, 19:39 CEST]:
i have been running irrd for some years. am about to dump that
(virtual) server and move from freebsd to bullseye. is there
anything more modern, and _simpler_, than irrd at which i should
take a look?
What are you running irrd
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 2:37 PM Randy Bush wrote:
>
> i have been running irrd for some years. am about to dump that
> (virtual) server and move from freebsd to bullseye. is there
> anything more modern, and _simpler_, than irrd at which i should
> take a look?
While IRRd4 fa
i have been running irrd for some years. am about to dump that
(virtual) server and move from freebsd to bullseye. is there
anything more modern, and _simpler_, than irrd at which i should
take a look?
randy
>> i am sure there are more things to do; and hope that wiser folk will
>> expand, comment, and correct.
>
> Stay far away from AS0...
one of 42 ways, invented by clever people, to shoot yourself in the foot
randy
On 6/10/21 20:08, Randy Bush wrote:
i am sure there are more things to do; and hope that wiser folk will
expand, comment, and correct.
Stay far away from AS0...
Mark.
cts. Existing RPKI ROAs help
> prevent future creation of unauthorized IRR objects.
cool!
what stands between my current world and when i can remove my irrd
instance and when i can remove (which) objects from the ripe whois?
< psa >
15-20 years back, when designing early rpki depl
Dear all,
I am Troy from NTT's Global IP Network IRR team.
Today we upgraded rr.ntt.net to IRRd 4.1.2!
This marks the completion of a multi-year initiative to seamlessly
integrate IRR and RPKI.
While this version might not seem remarkable, this change means that
NTT's IRR mirror service
Dear Ruben, all,
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:18:32PM -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> TC IRR, an IRR operator focused on Brazilian networks, just changed to
> IRRd 4.2. The new version allowed TC to deploy RPKI validation
> (thanks NTT for sponsoring that development) and expose HTTPS
&g
Hi all.
TC IRR, an IRR operator focused on Brazilian networks, just changed to IRRd
4.2.
The new version allowed TC to deploy RPKI validation (thanks NTT for
sponsoring that development) and expose HTTPS endpoints for WHOIS and
submission that we hope will foster innovation around the database
,
> Rubens (on behalf of TC)
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:27 PM Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi there.
>> TC, a large IRR database focused on Brazilian networks, just changed its
>> IP addresses. In most IRRd implementations it's necessary to sighup the
>>
act on it, it would be nice.
Thanks,
Rubens (on behalf of TC)
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:27 PM Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
> Hi there.
> TC, a large IRR database focused on Brazilian networks, just changed its
> IP addresses. In most IRRd implementations it's necessary to sighup the
>
Hi there.
TC, a large IRR database focused on Brazilian networks, just changed its IP
addresses. In most IRRd implementations it's necessary to sighup the daemon
to move to the new IP addresses, so we kindly ask those running public and
private IRR instances to sighup in order to move to the new
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Eduardo Meyer dudu.me...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have installed IRRd and I am trying to set it up, just for study
purposes. I have successfully mirrored some DBs but I cant handle to
make my very first maintainer creation. irrd-user.pdf seems to be the
only
Hello,
I have installed IRRd and I am trying to set it up, just for study
purposes. I have successfully mirrored some DBs but I cant handle to
make my very first maintainer creation. irrd-user.pdf seems to be the
only documentation around and it says nothing about How the admin
creates
28 matches
Mail list logo
