Dear Bradley,
So basically you're asking others to do your homework for you ?
The only useful purpose your list serves is to demonstrate why people
shouldn't try to build fancy algorithms that rely on an entirely
unreliable datasource.
All you end up with are hacked together algorithms
On 08/27/2013 12:33 PM, Bradley Huffaker wrote:
We are currently working on an algorithm that automatically detects
geographic hints inside of hostnames. At this point we are seeking
operators who can validate some of our inferences. Please contact me
if you can valid one of the inferences
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:35 PM, tabris tab...@tabris.net wrote:
On 08/27/2013 12:33 PM, Bradley Huffaker wrote:
We are currently working on an algorithm that automatically detects
geographic hints inside of hostnames. At this point we are seeking
operators who can validate some of our
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:45:09PM -0700, Matthew Petach wrote:
Hitting 93% accuracy is actually pretty mindblowing
from my perspective, given how random some of
the naming choices are. ^_^;
This is the number of times we think we have an answer and it is wrong.
It does not include the
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Bradley Huffaker bhuff...@caida.orgwrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:45:09PM -0700, Matthew Petach wrote:
Hitting 93% accuracy is actually pretty mindblowing
from my perspective, given how random some of
the naming choices are. ^_^;
This is the number of
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:07:05PM +0100, Ben wrote:
Dear Bradley,
So basically you're asking others to do your homework for you ? ;-)
Actually no, I'm asking people to do something which I can not.
While it is true I could test against a manual inference, I would simply
be checking one
We are currently working on an algorithm that automatically detects
geographic hints inside of hostnames. At this point we are seeking
operators who can validate some of our inferences. Please contact me
if you can valid one of the inferences below or can provide us with one
we have missed.
7 matches
Mail list logo
