Jeff Kell wrote:
If we continue along orders of magnitude, sure it's foreseeable.
* 30 years ago, 300 baud was the bomb :-)
* 3000 baud was roughly 2400bps days
* 3 baud gets us to ~28.8k
*30 baud was about 2 ISDN lines (2x128k)
* 300
micky coughes wrote:
I can see that *everybody* is missing the point on Peter's exercise.
Clearly this is to show to the telcos of the world that you can upgrade
to a native IP infrastructure and absorb the existing transport into the
router with a minimal effort. There was a post here from
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:19:08 BST, Leigh Porter said:
I see a global demand for perhaps 5 CRS-1s ;-)
To be fair, the original of said comment has to be taken in context. If
he were alive today, he'd probably say There's a world market for maybe
5 fully max-config'ed Blue Gene systems.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:57:01 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Maybe I'm missing something as I'm not the smartest guy on this list, but
what exactly did this prove?
Always an important question to ask...
Although, a picture of Peter Lothberg in his mothers basement standing
next to a CRS-1
Maybe I'm missing something as I'm not the smartest guy on this list, but
what exactly did this prove? ISP's aren't going to start handing out home
connections at 40G per or even 1G. The best pipe they can use between
ISP's is probably going to be the same 40-G blade so even at 500M per they
Randy Bush wrote:
you're not going to find any 40GB capable CPE now or in the
foreseeable future that's going to be affordable for the residence.
i would agree if we had not once said that about a few meg per sec.
If we continue along orders of magnitude, sure it's foreseeable.
* 30
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, micky coughes wrote:
I can see that *everybody* is missing the point on Peter's exercise.
Clearly this is to show to the telcos of the world that you can upgrade to a
native IP infrastructure and absorb the existing transport into the router
with a minimal effort. There
7 matches
Mail list logo
