On (2013-08-30 11:30 -0400), Tim Durack wrote:
It would be interesting to have some other smart SFP options too, like
macsec for example...
Or HQoS in a SFP, for that one port which kills your ability to get away
with cheap L3-switch style box :)
But tbh the moment you'll need control-plane
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jamie Bowden ja...@photon.com wrote:
From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
Considering that Dell and HP at least are shipping brand new hardware with
IPMI/BMC/iLO/whatever management ports that can only speak 100mbit when
every other Ethernet interface in the
On hp proliant gen8 servers with management and ilo on same port, with the
server off the ports show up as 100mbps.
Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jamie Bowden ja...@photon.com wrote:
From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
Considering that Dell and HP at
WOL uses 100Mb/s, the phy draws less that way.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:13, Charles N Wyble charles-li...@knownelement.com
wrote:
On hp proliant gen8 servers with management and ilo on same port, with the
server off the ports show up as 100mbps.
Jimmy Hess
Ah, I needed *another* reason to murder WOL in it's sleep. Thanks!
Nick
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
WOL uses 100Mb/s, the phy draws less that way.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:13, Charles N Wyble charles-li...@knownelement.com
Unless I missed something, iLO is always on when the machine has
power; as such, WOL shouldn't be coming into play on reasonably modern
HP servers. (That said, the power draw is likely still the reason,
although I can't readily confirm Charles' observation on my only
rackmount Gen8.)
to natively support
10M and 100M rates.
Technically obviously solution to me would be subrate SFP, which presents
itself as 1GE to host, offering 100M or 10M to client. This would
obviously
break QoS at the host as host would still think it's 1GE and SFP itself
would need to drop+buffer
There is absolutely no reason that you couldn't deliver 'media converter'
or '2 port switch' in a SFP casing
Yes, similar devices exist
http://www.rad.com/10/SFP-Format-TDM-Pseudowire-Gateway/10267/
so it probably just needs more demand
brandon
I actually emailed RAD, MethodE and Avago yesterday and pitched the idea.
MiTOP is my exact justification why it should technically be feasible.
I guess it would be easier to pitch, if there would be commitment to buy,
but I don't personally need many units, just 1-2 here and there.
On 30
I actually emailed RAD, MethodE and Avago yesterday and pitched the idea.
MiTOP is my exact justification why it should technically be feasible.
I guess it would be easier to pitch, if there would be commitment to buy,
but I don't personally need many units, just 1-2 here and there.
I
From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
I got quite a bit of replies from sellers selling me cuSFP, insisting they
work.
So I'd like to clear up on this. For 10/100 to work on SFP slot, the PHY in
the host needs to be multirate. Exception is SGMII which supposedly
supports magic mode where
I think this is a great idea. Maybe not a huge market, but I would buy
them, instead of having to use dumb transceivers.
It would be interesting to have some other smart SFP options too, like
macsec for example...
Tim:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
I actually
How do people deal with situation where you need =48 SFP/SFP+ ports, but
you occasionally need one or two cu 10/100 ports?
For some reason it's becoming quite rare for SFP port to natively support
10M and 100M rates.
Technically obviously solution to me would be subrate SFP, which presents
.
For some reason it's becoming quite rare for SFP port to natively support
10M and 100M rates.
Technically obviously solution to me would be subrate SFP, which presents
itself as 1GE to host, offering 100M or 10M to client. This would obviously
break QoS at the host as host would still think it's
14 matches
Mail list logo
