On 10/16/07, Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:03:36PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
At 60 votes, that's .6% participation. If we don't hit at least 2, we
ought to seriously consider disbanding the current evolution.
If that means the disbanding of
On 16-Oct-2007, at 0950, Betty J. Burke wrote:
Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process ..
Voting activity picked up a lot this morning, but if the level of
participation doesn't increase rapidly, we may have a lower
turnout than last year. I think last year we had about
Hello,
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, at 10:50, Joe Abley wrote:
On 16-Oct-2007, at 0950, Betty J. Burke wrote:
Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process ..
Voting activity picked up a lot this morning, but if the level of
participation doesn't increase rapidly, we may have
Question, I wonder if we can get statistics on how many people who have
registered at this nanog have voted vs those who are not physically here?
This would help determine if putting a voting desktop outside of main
conference room help increase voting participation?
Also, possibly, instead of
