> > The data shows random based on time of year vs. avg
> > temperature vs. attendees.
>
> Given that the data didn't include any information about average
> temperature, I'm not sure that's accurate :-)
Oh, sorry! Acquired from NOAA and Environment Canada. It's quite
accurate.
> Merit's pr
On 28-Feb-2007, at 14:03, Martin Hannigan wrote:
As far as raw numbers go, expecting a dip in cold climates is
an error.
I'm not sure what you mean. Who expects a dip in cold climates?
The data shows random based on time of year vs. avg
temperature vs. attendees.
Given that the data didn'
>
>
> On 26-Feb-2007, at 17:39, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
[ snip ]
>
> We expect (empirically) a dip in the winter meetings, which I think
> is illustrated by the numbers above (with Toronto and Salt Lake City
> as outliers). The theory that is most frequently put forward to
> explain the wi
On 26-Feb-2007, at 17:39, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 07:21:31AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
I don't know how many people that attended NANOG in Toronto had
to go
through the "international travel approval" that some of us had to.
probably not the canadians.
this is NAnog, not
