Shrdlu wrote:
Clue Store wrote:
Mine's rebooted at leat 3 times a day sine the upgrade :(
What ever happened to quality control
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2152619tstart=0
At the risk of sounding too much like the cranky retiree that I am, I
would like to see
Simon Lyall wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Gadi Evron wrote:
Beg pardon, but does this include a message to the list itself or only
to the offender?
When the thread is first moderated a message will be sent to the list ( at
least for now ).
Each message sent to a moderated thread will receive
on this.
--
Kris
on behalf of the MLC
___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com
Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:29, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
That's funny, given that Mailman is the source of significant amounts
of backscatter.
Mailman is neither an MTA nor a MUA. Something before or after
Mailman is backscattering.
-Jim P.
Mailing
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Simon Lyall wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Not such a great idea. A down search engine is an operational problem
whether its application or network. It makes lots of phones ring and
finger pointing at our networks. This costs us money. Same for major
Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
No, let's not. To steal a line from rbush, we tried that three years
ago and it didn't work then.
Good point, but the situation is very different than what it was three
years ago. We have a moderation team, we have nanog-futures for meta
discussion, etc.
Further,
Cat Okita wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Gadi Evron wrote:
facts need to be aligned. What we are not happy with is how moderation
works.
Speak for yourself ; I'm quite sure that I'm not a part of the 'we'
you mention here.
Indeed! ;)
To be clear, we includes me and others who spoke here who
kris foster wrote:
Hi everyone
I am going to preface this by saying that the MLC appreciates that
transparency is of the most importance to the community, and that we
have not lived up to this as completely as we should have.
We have recently been experimenting with thread moderation.
Fellow NANOG-ers.
I am very happy eith the recent revival of traffic on NANOG on relevant
subjects, as I am sure we all are. My email is about traffic we don't
see and unless I am missing something, don't know gets filtered. due to
what I believe is very heavy-handed moderation by the admin
Christopher Morrow wrote:
do you have a link to this thread? (I don't actually see it in my box,
so I fear I missed it for other reasons)
oops, sorry... I did get the original message + ~6 followups. I just
hadn't read them :(
The follow-ups on-list were not extremely operational, the
Joe Provo wrote:
Gadi,
Some valid points are raised. While additional discussion from
interested folks here is encouraged, suffice to say that the topic
will be on the SC call tomorrow, as we are the folks whom receive
escalation appeals of MLC actions.
Thank you Joe. I appreciate your
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Gadi Evron wrote:
The question is IF given that we ensure these folks really did all they
can on their own, AND only then asked for help:
Is the end of line place to ask for that help NANOG, or somewhere else?
Gadi.
[replying to self]
A good example just hit NANOG
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:58:36PM -0400, Brian Raaen wrote:
Agreed... Mailman has a feature for emergency moderation of all post, created
just for flame wars like this.
chuckle I rate this one a 2 on a 10 scale of toastiness.
But I think I probably
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Brian Raaen wrote:
Agreed... Mailman has a feature for emergency moderation of all post, created
just for flame wars like this.
I don't think it's a flame war, just an active discussion most have
something to say about. I still think it should stop at this point but
while
will be welcome, and we appreciate your offer of
help. One thing we do appreciate help on is another NS, which is already
being taken care of.
Gadi.
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Gadi Evron wrote:
Lightning storm, subsequent commercial power failure. UPS not up due to
restructing.
We are working
Another point to this good list is:
Without blacklists such as the SBL we would no longer have email today.
That's not sensationalism, it's fact.
Two main reasons:
1. Spam over-whelms servers incoming.
2. Spam over-whelms server outgoing.
Thank you,
Gadi.
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Rich
16 matches
Mail list logo
