Re: [Nanog-futures] Moving Forward - What kind of NANOG do we want?

2010-07-03 Thread Todd Underwood
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote: On 7/2/10 8:29 PM, Simon Lyall wrote: Unless people serious intended for the organisation to have regular [1] meetings outside of North America (which I doubt) then it should retain the current general name and focus.

Re: [Nanog-futures] Moving Forward - What kind of NANOG do we want?

2010-07-03 Thread Andy Davidson
On 3 Jul 2010, at 04:29, Simon Lyall wrote: Unless people serious intended for the organisation to have regular [1] meetings outside of North America (which I doubt) No, don't. The rest of the world already has $regionNOG. If Nanog becaome WorldNOG, someone would make, err, NANOG again.