Rich LOL !! thanks for your input :)
From: Richard Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rolo Tomassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Peering best practices advice needed.
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 12:56:13 -0500
Rolo Tomassi wrote:
Hi all,
Please forgive the simplistic nature of the
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 17:03 +, Rolo Tomassi wrote:
Hi all,
Please forgive the simplistic nature of the query..
Basically my company is multi-homed with 2 different providers in the UK,
and advertising a /18. Now some colleaguges in another part of the world
want to break that /18
On 8-dec-04, at 18:03, Rolo Tomassi wrote:
Now someone mentioned that we could use AS-LOOP-IN feature which will
overcome this problem and allow us to route to each other via EBGP.
Some gear doesn't send updates with AS X in the path to AS X. So
depending on the type of routers your upstreams
While doing a quick sample of my spam to see where spamvertized web sites
were hosted and registered, I came across the domain vestigial3had.com
shell1% whois vestigial3had.com
Whois Server Version 1.3
Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
with many different competing
http://www.nwfusion.com/edge/news/2004/1209li.html
- ferg
http://www.nwfusion.com/edge/news/2004/1209li.html
- ferg
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Mike Tancsa wrote:
While doing a quick sample of my spam to see where spamvertized web sites
were hosted and registered, I came across the domain vestigial3had.com
shell1% whois vestigial3had.com
...
No match for VESTIGIAL3HAD.COM.
What gives ? How can their be no
At 11:17 AM 09/12/2004, william(at)elan.net wrote:
Read NANOG archives - Verisign now allows immediate (well, within about 10
minutes) updates of .com/.net zones (also same for .biz)
Yes, I was aware of that.
while whois data
is still updated once or twice a day.
I (wrongly) assumed that the
That is huge!I guess Cisco delivered a dump trunk full of hundos to Tony's house. :)
-- Original message --http://www.nwfusion.com/edge/news/2004/1209li.html - ferg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is huge! I guess Cisco delivered a dump trunk full of hundos to
Tony's house. :)
That, or they finally got the nail out of the door, from
his last resignation.
:P
-- Original message --
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 03:52:38AM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
After a much too long introduction here comes my questions: is this
deliberate? I can understand that Chad has bigger things to worry about
than 24 domains getting on yet another spam list, but why Canada makes
nearly half a million
--On 09 December 2004 10:24 -0500 Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The irony of all this is that spammers already have all this information
-- yet registrars have gone out of their way to make it as difficult as
possible for everyone else to get it (rate-limiting queries and so on).
They
- Original Message -
From: Alex Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Alex Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: zone transfers, a spammer's dream?]
--On 09 December 2004 10:24 -0500 Rich
Alex Bligh wrote:
The irony of all this is that spammers already have all this information
-- yet registrars have gone out of their way to make it as difficult as
possible for everyone else to get it (rate-limiting queries and so on).
They clearly don't already have this information, or they
--On 09 December 2004 18:46 +0100 Kandra Nygårds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IE sure, there's a lot of leaked information out there (often including
personal data), that doesn't mean responsible registries should add
to it.
Such as... selling access to the data to anyone who pays? No, responsible
At 11:17 AM 12/09/04 -0500, Richard Irving wrote:
That, or they finally got the nail out of the door, from his last
resignation.
there were two nails in that board... It's a long story... But the
interesting part was that all those toys actually fit into Dr. Bug...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, nothing gives Netsol title to a domain that
someone happens to have registered through them after that registration
expires.
I apologize to Verisign for my earlier comment. I thought this was
something
being done by the registry at the top level. My mistake.
Does
Title: Service Contracts
Hi all,
Hopefully this is not too off-topic; I'm looking for guidance in penalty clauses in service contract agreements. I run a small WAN for a town. We have an internet T-1, an internal frame T-1, five point-to-point T-1's and a small smattering of PVC's and
At 01:50 PM 09/12/2004, Jeff Rosowski wrote:
shell1% whois vestigial3had.com
...
No match for VESTIGIAL3HAD.COM.
What gives ? How can there be no whois info anywhere ?
You can also make whois information private, usually for an additional fee.
I wonder what % of domains that have their whois info
Have you thought about using wireless links to connect your remote sites
instead of using T1's? Most installations will pay for themselves in under a
year. Send me an email or give me a call if your interested in options.
Thanks,
Russ Kreigh
Network Engineer
OnlyInternet.Net Broadband
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: no whois info ?
At 01:50 PM 09/12/2004, Jeff Rosowski wrote:
shell1% whois vestigial3had.com
...
No match for VESTIGIAL3HAD.COM.
At 02:44 PM 09/12/2004, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
Perhaps 100% of spammers hide their registration data when possible,
but I wouldn't say that 100% of hidden registrations are spammers.
An RBL option of this type of data would probably mean forced
elimination of a benefit to the public - privacy.
On Dec 9, 2004, at 2:23 PM, Sam (Walter) Gailey wrote:
Hopefully this is not too off-topic; I'm looking for guidance in
penalty clauses in service contract agreements. I run a small WAN for
a town. We have an internet T-1, an internal frame T-1, five
point-to-point T-1's and a small smattering
At 02:33 PM 12/9/2004, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 01:50 PM 09/12/2004, Jeff Rosowski wrote:
shell1% whois vestigial3had.com
...
No match for VESTIGIAL3HAD.COM.
What gives ? How can there be no whois info anywhere ?
You can also make whois information private, usually for an additional fee.
I wonder
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 04:59:33PM +, Alex Bligh wrote:
They clearly don't already have this information, or they wouldn't
be
a) offering to pay people for it
b) continue to be trying to obtain it by data mining.
Sure, some of them quite clearly don't. And so they're buying it
from
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 3:00 PM
To: Hannigan, Martin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: no whois info ?
At 02:44 PM 09/12/2004, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
[SNIP]
There has to be a balance between expectations
At 03:10 PM 09/12/2004, Daniel Senie wrote:
The WHOIS data is there to ensure there's someone to contact. As long as
the data listed can be used to reach the domain holder for legitimate
purposes (technical problems, etc.), why should you care if the listed
address is a Care Of address, the
Is anyone else experiencing DNS timeout
errors. I've tried using multiple name
resolvers, and tested multiple domain
names using different name servers, and
I keep getting name not found errors.
Trying the same domain name a second
time, and it resolves ok. This all
started a few days ago.
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Jay Fenello wrote:
Is anyone else experiencing DNS timeout
errors. I've tried using multiple name
resolvers, and tested multiple domain
names using different name servers, and
I keep getting name not found errors.
perhaps some examples of the domains queried and
Hi guys. I figured I might as well ping, as I do once a year on
different forums since `96, and send some information here asking for help.
The following drone army seems to be on the move, switching binary and
relay server, which is why I allow myself to post it openly.
Anyone seeing any
Jay,
Is anyone else experiencing DNS timeout errors. I've tried using
multiple name resolvers, and tested multiple domain names using
different name servers, and I keep getting name not found errors.
Trying the same domain name a second time, and it resolves ok. This
all started a few
Jeff Rosowski wrote:
shell1% whois vestigial3had.com
...
No match for VESTIGIAL3HAD.COM.
What gives ? How can their be no whois info anywhere ?
How about the following... (note that just because someone is using
someone as their authoritative name server doesn't mean that the other
people (in
Hi!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig ns vestigial3had.com
snip
;; ANSWER SECTION:
vestigial3had.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.kronuna.biz.
vestigial3had.com. 172800 IN NS ns2.kronuna.biz.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ whois kronuna.biz
[Querying whois.neulevel.biz]
[whois.neulevel.biz]
At 07:49 PM 09/12/2004, Peter John Hill wrote:
Jeff Rosowski wrote:
shell1% whois vestigial3had.com
...
No match for VESTIGIAL3HAD.COM.
What gives ? How can their be no whois info anywhere ?
How about the following... (note that just because someone is using
someone as their authoritative name
More fun...
Mike Tancsa wrote:
1M IN MX10 www
1M IN A 200.124.75.12
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ whois 200.124.75.12
inetnum: 200.124.64/19
responsible: GoldToe International Inc.
address: 60 Market Square, 0, 0
address: 0 -
I wonder what % of domains that have their whois info hidden or
private are throwaway spam domains... Some number approaching 100% I
would bet. It would be nice to somehow incorporate this into a
SpamAssassin check somehow.
Please don't, there are legitimate reasons to have private domain
At 10:32 PM 09/12/2004, Janet Sullivan wrote:
I wonder what % of domains that have their whois info hidden or private
are throwaway spam domains... Some number approaching 100% I would
bet. It would be nice to somehow incorporate this into a SpamAssassin
check somehow.
Please don't, there are
Please CC me in all replies or reply offlist if not appropriate for list.
I am trying to find equipment for an OC48+ ring for hauling DS3s. I've
read lots of documentation on handling fiber failures and repathing the
circuits the other direction on the ring. I know a lot of providers will
sell
38 matches
Mail list logo
