On 4/30/2013 10:36 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 4/30/13, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
With all due respect, this is a reference in section 8.3 to call out that
the policies in section 4 regarding qualification of recipients are to be
followed when determining eligibility for an 8.3 transfer.
Hello folks,
Have you ever seen DNS issues on Office 365?
MX record of Office 365 is example.mail.eo.outlook.com.
I can get the MX record, however, I could not get the A record of the MX
record, got Timeout.
Does anyone have the same issue?
Sincerely,
Yuji
Joel,
Am 30.04.2013 18:00, schrieb joel jaeggli:
On 4/30/13 8:23 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
On 30.04.2013 17:07, Chris Boyd wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits
(Disregarding
a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said
On May 1, 2013, at 3:51 AM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote:
Now, the actual language that is in the NRPM says The recipient must
demonstrate the need for up to a 24-month supply* of IP address resources
under current ARIN policies and sign an RSA. ... if someone thinks that
On May 1, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
Now since a few weeks we get regular complaints about this. So something has
changed.
Yes, things have changed. There are reasons that some of the transit ISPs are
performing this blocking. They aren't doing it for kicks.
For example,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
Please provide advice and insights as well as directing customers to the
openresolverproject.org website. We want to close these down, if you need an
accurate list of IPs in your ASN, please email me and I can give you
On May 1, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
The public list of smurf amplifiers turned out to be the only way to really
deal with it.
It certainly helped; but the real solution was to get Cisco, et. al. to disable
directed broadcasts by default.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:47:40PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
If the phishing attack is against an enterprise that is also an ISP,
surely you can imagine a case where they might block traffic to prevent
folks from being phished.
This is not an effective anti-phishing tactic, any more than user
On May 1, 2013, at 7:44 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:47:40PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
If the phishing attack is against an enterprise that is also an ISP,
surely you can imagine a case where they might block traffic to prevent
folks from being phished.
On 05/01/2013 05:40 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
Joel,
Am 30.04.2013 18:00, schrieb joel jaeggli:
On 4/30/13 8:23 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
On 30.04.2013 17:07, Chris Boyd wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits
(Disregarding
On 2013-05-01, at 01:23, joseph.sny...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't cable Bahamas sell in andros
BaTelCo has five retail stores on Andros too, which suggests they offer some
kind of service there (whether wireline or wireless).
For a list whose subscribers have generally more experience on the
The company I work for has been having Outlook connectivity issues
(intermittent for only a few end users) for the past 7 days for Office 365.
We are in an upgrade status (on the 18th days or so; have been told it can
last 30 days) and they changed our MX records without formal notification.
We
Well,
I was going more for a public list of ISP that refuse to BCP38 their
networks.
But that's just me =D
On point: (If your corporation is massive enough)
Basically:
. Mirror DST Port 53;
. Write some software to stats who's spamming the same DST IP with
the same
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:20:59AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2013-05-01, at 01:23, joseph.sny...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't cable Bahamas sell in andros
BaTelCo has five retail stores on Andros too, which suggests they offer some
kind of service there (whether wireline or wireless).
its
I am also having the some issues going on 3 weeks now. I cannot access my
e-mail via Outlook and my MX records keep changing. It is nuts support has
been unable to help.
From: JoeSox
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 9:24 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject:
Is anyone else seeing this? From Santa Clara, CA, on Comcast
Business...I'm getting SERVFAIL for any query I throw at 8.8.8.8 and
8.8.4.4...
Level 3's own public resolvers are fine for me, as are OpenDNS's resolvers.
Blair
Just another day for them.. Office 365 has been broken for us for a long time.
I've been thinking about a rackspace hosted exchange instead.. Have you guys
looked into alternatives?
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: JoeSox joe...@gmail.com
Date:
Works fine from here, Philadelphia, PA .edu and FIOS networks
Cheers,
Harry
On 05/01/2013 12:09 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
Is anyone else seeing this? From Santa Clara, CA, on Comcast
Business...I'm getting SERVFAIL for any query I throw at 8.8.8.8 and
8.8.4.4...
Level 3's own public
Ryan,
Is your Office 365 account also in an upgrade status? If not, have you
completed the upgrade?
--
Thanks, Joe
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Ryan Finnesey r...@finnesey.com wrote:
I am also having the some issues going on 3 weeks now. I cannot access my
e-mail via Outlook and my MX
On 2013-05-01, at 12:09, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone else seeing this? From Santa Clara, CA, on Comcast
Business...I'm getting SERVFAIL for any query I throw at 8.8.8.8 and
8.8.4.4...
Level 3's own public resolvers are fine for me, as are OpenDNS's resolvers.
That's all well and good, but I certainly wouldn't expect nslookup
gmail.com or for nslookup google.com to return SERVFAIL
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
On 2013-05-01, at 12:09, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone else seeing this?
No issues on Comcast cable in the bay area, either Comcast business or
Comcast home.
Scott
$ nslookup gmail.com 8.8.4.4
Server: 8.8.4.4
Address:8.8.4.4#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: gmail.com
Address: 74.125.239.149
Name: gmail.com
Address: 74.125.239.150
On
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote:
That's all well and good, but I certainly wouldn't expect nslookup
gmail.com or for nslookup google.com to return SERVFAIL
If you set the CD (checking disabled) in the request, a response that
would normally be
Goes all the way up to the A root server before failing spectacularly.
Europa:~ blair$ dig +cd @8.8.8.8 google.com A
; DiG 9.8.3-P1 +cd @8.8.8.8 google.com A
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 47332
;; flags: qr rd ra cd;
8.8.4.4 is now replying SERVFAIL whereas 8.8.8.8 is suddenly working fine
again...
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.comwrote:
Goes all the way up to the A root server before failing spectacularly.
Europa:~ blair$ dig +cd @8.8.8.8 google.com A
; DiG
Your IPs may have been rate limited...
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 5/1/13 12:38 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
That's all well and good, but I certainly wouldn't expect nslookup
gmail.com or for nslookup google.com to return SERVFAIL
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Joe Abley
After our upgrade, we started to see the body of received PLAIN TEXT
emails truncated at less than 256 bytes,
which frequently truncated emails in the middle of a word, the fix was a
setting change.
Since being standardized in 1982 with RFC 822, you would think PLAIN TEXT
emails would just work
Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote:
Goes all the way up to the A root server before failing spectacularly.
That is an extremely weird response. Are you sure your queries are not
being intercepted by a middlebox? What happens if you use dig +vc ?
Do you get a similar round-trip time
I believe Jimmy's confusion results primarily as follows:
From NRPM 8.3:
8.3. Transfers between Specified Recipients within the ARIN Region
In addition to transfers under section 8.2, IPv4 numbers resources and ASNs
may be transferred according to the following conditions.
Conditions on
Once upon a time, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca said:
Raw output from dig/drill and traceroutes to 8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4 are highly
recommended if you need to take this further.
Does Google (and OpenDNS for that matter) support any special queries
that identify the host/cluster/etc.? Something like
On May 1, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote:
Goes all the way up to the A root server before failing spectacularly.
That is an extremely weird response. Are you sure your queries are not
being intercepted by a middlebox? What
Traceroute is getting the right place and 8.8.8.8 is working, though :)
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
On May 1, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote:
Goes all the way up to the A root
On 5/1/13 2:23 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
On May 1, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote:
Goes all the way up to the A root server before failing spectacularly.
That is an extremely weird response. Are you sure your
Do any of you have a go to resource for materials used in installations? Tie
wraps, cable management, blahblahblah?
I have found several places, but I'm curious to know what the nanog ninja's
have to say.
//warren
Graybar.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
Do any of you have a go to resource for materials used in installations?
Tie wraps, cable management, blahblahblah?
I have found several
On the cheap Lowes/Home Depot are awesome, and they're everywhere.
On 05/01/2013 03:23 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
Do any of you have a go to resource for materials used in installations?
Tie wraps, cable management, blahblahblah?
I have found several places, but I'm curious to know what the
I'm a huge fan of netig... they bend over backwards for you.
-chris
Do any of you have a go to resource for materials used in installations?
Tie wraps, cable management, blahblahblah?
I have found several places, but I'm curious to know what the nanog ninja's
have to say.
//warren
-Original Message-
From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 2:24 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Data Center Installations
Do any of you have a go to resource for materials used in
installations? Tie wraps, cable management,
Seconded Graybar. If necessary, in the absence of Graybar or for tiny
stuff, a Frys or Home Depot or Lowes.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
Graybar.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Warren Bailey
Tessco or Hutton. Lil pricey unless you buy in bulk. Good fit for you
though since they carry RF and antenna stuff too.
-mike
Sent from my iPhone
On May 1, 2013, at 12:45, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. o...@ocosa.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Warren Bailey
On 04/29/13 15:38, Brzozowski, John wrote:
FYI for folks that are interested:
http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-launches-ipv6-for-business-customers
Great news!
Strangely, I (a Comcast Business customer at home) have noticed RAs
coming across my wire for several months now.
On 04/30/2013 05:28 PM, Thomas St-Pierre wrote:
The large majority of the servers being used in the attacks are not
open resolvers. Just DNS servers that are authoritative for a few
domains, and the default config of the dns application does referrals
to root for anything else.
It sounds like
It is very courteous to reply a SERVFAIL for requests being rate limited.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Fried andrew.fr...@gmail.com wrote:
Your IPs may have been rate limited...
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 5/1/13 12:38 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
That's all well
On Wednesday 01 May 2013 12:23, Warren Bailey wrote:
Do any of you have a go to resource for materials used in installations?
Tie wraps, cable management, blahblahblah?
I have found several places, but I'm curious to know what the nanog ninja's
have to say.
Would largely depend on your
We have fixed the problem. I had to complete a clear install of Outlook and
remove the credentials that where on the computer in the control panel under
credential manager. This may also fix/help with your issue.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Tony Patti
Le 01/05/2013 14:46, David Miller a écrit :
On 05/01/2013 05:40 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
Joel,
Am 30.04.2013 18:00, schrieb joel jaeggli:
On 4/30/13 8:23 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
On 30.04.2013 17:07, Chris Boyd wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
1) Do nothing - They're
I have a question for the QOS gurus out there.
We are having some problems with packet loss for our
smaller MPLS locations. This packet loss is due to the large speed
differential on our Hub site(150mb/s) in comparison the the branch office
locations(single T-1 to 4.5mb/s
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Yang Yu yang.yu.l...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very courteous to reply a SERVFAIL for requests being rate limited.
I believe the 'rate-limit' response is actually 'no response' ... though I
haven't tested this myself :)
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Andrew
- Original Message -
From: Tony Patti t...@swalter.com
After our upgrade, we started to see the body of received PLAIN TEXT
emails truncated at less than 256 bytes,
which frequently truncated emails in the middle of a word, the fix was
a setting change.
Since being standardized in
-Original Message-
From: Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List
[mailto:blake.mailingl...@pfankuch.me]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 6:18 PM
To: Otis L. Surratt, Jr.; Warren Bailey; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Data Center Installations
Along this same line of questioning... favorite Velcro? I
For bulk velcro, I found Uline to be fairly cheap.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. o...@ocosa.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List
[mailto:blake.mailingl...@pfankuch.me]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 6:18 PM
To: Otis L. Surratt,
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
For bulk velcro, I found Uline to be fairly cheap.
I have to ask, is this an April fools joke? ULine isn't cheap for
anything. Monoprice, $13, around $25 delivered depending on where
you're at and how yu ship it, for 5x black
Is hard to beat Monoprice :)
But no, I have purchased velcro in bulk from ULine (not the kind for
wrapping cable though) and found it to be cheaper and I usually got it the
next day for not that much shipping.
-Mike
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Michael Loftis mlof...@wgops.com wrote:
On
Zip ties have no reason to be in a dc grr
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-05-01, at 6:57 PM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Is hard to beat Monoprice :)
But no, I have purchased velcro in bulk from ULine (not the kind for
wrapping cable though) and found it to be cheaper and I usually
Bring your lacing skills?
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: Mark Gauvin mgau...@dryden.ca
Date: 05/01/2013 5:01 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Data Center Installations
Zip ties have no
On 5/1/2013 7:57 PM, Mark Gauvin wrote:
Zip ties have no reason to be in a dc grr
They have their place, but decidedly not in data center racks where
**nothing** is permanent/fixed very long :)
Jeff
http://email-guru.com/ ?
---
() ascii ribbon campaign against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org
-Original Message-
From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 01 May, 2013 10:12
To: JoeSox; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Could not send
Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com writes:
Do any of you have a go to resource for materials used in
installations? Tie wraps, cable management, blahblahblah?
For stuff that they carry, Deep Surplus has been acceptable quality
and the price is generally right. Others have
On 5/1/13, Wes Tribble westrib...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a question for the QOS gurus out there.
cisco-nsp might be a better place to post your question. But in any
case, this option looks right:
Another Idea I had was to create a bunch of shaper classes all feeding the
same child policy for
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
Bring your lacing skills
Flex cross twist knot flex cross twist flex cross twist knot flex cross
twist...
-Blake
On May 1, 2013 5:09 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Yang Yu yang.yu.l...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very courteous to reply a SERVFAIL for requests being rate
limited.
I believe the 'rate-limit' response is actually 'no response' ...
Yes we are just working out our licensing agreement and moving Exchange back in
house. From talking with people BPOS (Exchange 2007) was a mess. We were on
Office 365 with Exchange 2010 without issue service worked very well. Then
they upgraded us to Exchange 2013 and it is just broken we
Wish there was Frys in the east
-Original Message-
From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 3:42 PM
To: Joe Hamelin
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Data Center Installations
Seconded Graybar. If necessary, in the absence of Graybar or for
It was in upgrade status for about 15 days. We had to open a separate ticket
to fix the upgrade but even after they completed the upgrade I was unable to
connect.
-Original Message-
From: JoeSox [mailto:joe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 12:28 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Graybar is great
-Original Message-
From: Joe Hamelin [mailto:j...@nethead.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 3:32 PM
To: Warren Bailey
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Data Center Installations
Graybar.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:23
I'm more impressed with MicroCenter than Frys (at least the Frys south if
SF).
If you need RF I used to order from Davis RF all the time.
On May 2, 2013 12:57 AM, Ryan Finnesey r...@finnesey.com wrote:
Wish there was Frys in the east
-Original Message-
From: George Herbert
Never been to MicroCenter
Sent from my iPad mini
On May 2, 2013, at 1:05 AM, shawn wilson
ag4ve...@gmail.commailto:ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm more impressed with MicroCenter than Frys (at least the Frys south if SF).
If you need RF I used to order from Davis RF all the time.
On May 2,
67 matches
Mail list logo
