On Thursday, July 31, 2014 01:56:40 AM Leo Bicknell wrote:
I'm an outlier in my thinking, but I believe the best
world would be where the muni offered L1 fiber, and
leased access to it on a non-discrimatory basis. That
would necessitate an Active-E solution since L1 would
not have things
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 01:35:32 AM Owen DeLong wrote:
In that case, I would argue that the attempts to freeze
Netflix out in a SlowLane extortion scheme are a move by
the existing content/ISP conglomerates to do just
exactly that, no?
For Netflix, I can't say for sure whether it is a
i nominate pigasus, she'll fit right in
An update, apparently writs of attachment were sent for not only .ir, but
also .sy and .kp ccTLDs as well, based on separate cases related to support
for terrorism.
and they left out IL?
Subject: Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Date: Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 06:56:40PM
-0500 Quoting Leo Bicknell (bickn...@ufp.org):
On Jul 30, 2014, at 1:47 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
Symmetrical would be tough to do unless you're doing Active-
E.
I'm an outlier in my thinking,
If a new operator or city is building a greenfield access network from the
ground up, what software and hardware is needed in the core network to
provide and manage residential and business internet services similar to
the likes of ATT, Comcast, and Google Fiber? Television and Telephone
services
What is the ideal way to aggregate the 40 10G connections from the uplinks
of the chassis? I would guess a 10G switch since 10G ports on a router
would be much more expensive?
Definitely aggregate into a switch first unless you want to run a Layer 3
switch as your router, which I don't recommend.
Scott,
Thanks for the long post.
We will use a layer 2 10G aggregation switch then to aggregate the chassis
at the core location. Do you have any recommendations on 10G switches?
Yes I realize the math is a little backwards as this is all hypothetical at
this point. We would provision each ONT
On Jul 31, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Is a firewall needed in the core?
No, quite the opposite:
https://app.box.com/s/a3oqqlgwe15j8svojvzl
How would you build a access network from the ground up if you had the
resources and time to do so?
I'd hire folks
Roland,
I agree with everything you mentioned in your email. No matter how much
money and resources you have, if you don't have the talent and people
required to get the job done the project will fail. There a many outfits,
like Scotts for example, that will handle most all of these issues for an
On Jul 30, 2014, at 11:21 PM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 01:35:32 AM Owen DeLong wrote:
In that case, I would argue that the attempts to freeze
Netflix out in a SlowLane extortion scheme are a move by
the existing content/ISP conglomerates to do just
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 02:38:13PM +, Drew Weaver wrote:
We've been seeing some issues with getting to Ebay this morning, only a very
select few of their GSLB sites in DNS seem to be responding (to us at
least)...
Connecting to www.ebay.com|66.135.210.181|:80... connected.
HTTP
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
If a new operator or city is building a greenfield access network from the
ground up,
Hi Colton,
We just had a long discussion in this forum to the effect that if a
city builds a greenfield access network, it would be
Appears to be loading just fine from here in Sg.
On Jul 31, 2014 11:21 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 02:38:13PM +, Drew Weaver wrote:
We've been seeing some issues with getting to Ebay this morning, only a
very select few of their GSLB sites in DNS seem to
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 02:23:54AM +0900, Paul S. wrote:
Appears to be loading just fine from here in Sg.
On Jul 31, 2014 11:21 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 02:38:13PM +, Drew Weaver wrote:
We've been seeing some issues with getting to Ebay this
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
Scott,
Thanks for the long post.
We will use a layer 2 10G aggregation switch then to aggregate the chassis
at the core location. Do you have any recommendations on 10G switches?
Not really, just stick with one
I have read both the Juniper MX and Cisco ASR9K do support this advanced
BRAS functionality, what Juniper calls Subscriber Feature Management and
what Cisco calls BGN. These software functions run on the router itself,
however the are not free or included with the base chassis. To enable these
you
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have read both the Juniper MX and Cisco ASR9K do support this advanced
BRAS functionality, what Juniper calls Subscriber Feature Management and
what Cisco calls BGN. These software functions run on the router itself,
Scott,
Thank you for your input.
What do you recommend for network segmentation? A VLAN per Chassis, a VLAN
per service, or a VLAN per customer/port? When you say qinq VLANs are you
referring to the CVLAN model?
I am really interested to know how the largest providers, like Comcast,
ATT, and
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 02:01:28 PM Måns Nilsson wrote:
It is better, both for the customer and the provider.
If the provider is able to deliver 1Gbps to every home
(either on copper or fibre) with little to no uplink
oversubscription (think 44x customer-facing Gig-E ports + 4x
10Gbps
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 07:10:49 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
You are still misinterpreting my statement, or at least
it appears that you are.
The pleasures of e-mail, and tones they do not convey :-)...
I am not saying that Netflix is attempting to “grab”.
Yes, that's what I meant - by grab
21 matches
Mail list logo
