Anyone have any recommendations for a 16-17" LCD keyboard/mouse combo pull-out
tray that supports DisplayPort/USB as an input?
Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd
Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577
OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039
We recently received a demand to stop announcing a "fraudulent" prefix. Is
there an industry best practice when handling these kind of requests? Do you
have personal or company-specific preferences or requirements? To the best
of my knowledge, we've rarely, if ever, received such a request. This is
I would personally reach out to the technical POC for the customer. Perhaps
have your sales rep for the account resolve the issue.
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Sean Pedersen
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 1:47 PM
To
What about contacting ARIN? Does the customer have their own ASN? ETC ETC
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Naslund, Steve
wrote:
> I would personally reach out to the technical POC for the customer.
> Perhaps have your sales rep for the account resolve the issue.
>
> Steven Naslund
> Chicago IL
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Sean Pedersen
wrote:
> We recently received a demand to stop announcing a "fraudulent" prefix. Is
> there an industry best practice when handling these kind of requests? Do
> you
> have personal or company-specific preferences or requirements? To the best
> of my
I've seen this type of situation come up more than a few times with the shadier
IP brokers that lease and don't care who they lease to, for example Logicweb,
Cloudinnovation ( see
bgp.he.net/search?search[search]=cloudinnovation+OR+%22cloud+innovation%22 ),
Digital Energy-host1plus. The ranges
Without revealing too much identifying information, the prefix is allocated to
a 3rd party that is a customer of our customer. We have a signed LOA on hand
that matches the RIR database object details (names, prefix, etc.), and the
request to stop announcing came from another 3rd party that does
Sounds right to me. Unless someone else can prove ownership of the allocation
beyond a doubt I would leave it up and running.
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Sean Pedersen
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 2:46 PM
To: n..
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Sean Pedersen
wrote:
> I was just curious what others have experienced. Since so much of the
> Internet is "best effort" in terms of validation, I wasn't sure if there was
> much else that could be done.
Hi Sean,
The best practice is to go for the status quo wh
i have been the requestor of such actions before, and i generally sent the
take-down request with a referral to the ARIN entry with the netblock, which
shows the appropriate contacts.
i always sent the request from the account listed as ADMIN contact for
the netblock or OrgID.
in the request i n
it's a real shame there is no authorative cryptographically verifyable
attestation of address ownership.
Howdy!
Checking out various Netflow tools and wanted to see what others are using?
Kentik is cool. Are they the only SaaS based flow digester? I don’t seem to see
any others.
Also curious about on-prem solutions as well.
Thanks!
Mike
Hey Mike. Kentik does on-prem, too.
Full disclosure: I work for Kentik and I’m glad you think we’re cool :-)
Dan
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:26 PM wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> Checking out various Netflow tools and wanted to see what others are using?
>
> Kentik is cool. Are they the only SaaS based flow
I'm very fond of nfsen/nfdump for on-prem. Setup is not complicated at all
and plugins are widely available.
Also inbefore Solarwinds...
-Matt
On Mar 12, 2018 18:25, wrote:
Howdy!
Checking out various Netflow tools and wanted to see what others are using?
Kentik is cool. Are they the only S
On 2018-03-13 00:24, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> Checking out various Netflow tools and wanted to see what others are using?
>
> Kentik is cool. Are they the only SaaS based flow digester? I don’t seem to
> see any others.
>
> Also curious about on-prem solutions as well.
>
> Than
Ownership?...
(Duck)
-george
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 12, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> it's a real shame there is no authorative cryptographically verifyable
> attestation of address ownership.
How about signed ownership ? (https://keybase.io) if you are able to update the
record … and it is able to be signed then shouldn’t that be proof enough of
ownership of the ASN ?
If you can update a forward DNS record then you can have the reverse record
updated in the same sort of fashion and
>> On Mar 12, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>
>> it's a real shame there is no authorative cryptographically verifyable
>> attestation of address ownership.
> On Mar 12, 2018, at 21:20, George William Herbert
> wrote:
>
> Ownership?...
>
> (Duck)
--- jhellent...@dataix.net wrote:
haha. Sorry for the top posts. iOS what ya goin to do on a very long thread
capability. :-)
--
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Mar 12, 2018, at 22:26, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On Mar 12, 2018,
19 matches
Mail list logo
