Hi Job, all,
On the France-IX route servers, we are applying filters based on IRR
DBs. I double checked the list https://pastebin.com/raw/Jw1my9Bb and
these prefixes should be filtered if bitcanal starts announcing them.
Currently, bitcanal/AS197426 is not announcing any prefix on our route
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sidr/about/
Being presented at nanog nowish:
Architecting Robust BGP Routing Policies
Lightning Talk: BGP Transport Security - Do You Care?
Lightning Talk: Legal Barriers to Securing the Routing Architecture
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Hi,
On 27.06.2018 12:58, André Keller wrote:
> could somebody of AS2386 contact me off-list?
got a reply, thank you very much.
Regards
André
This is classic...
We have a direct BGP peering session to Microsoft using Express Routes for
the public peering session for services like Email, one drive, etc. this
uses MS Public. We also have/use MS Azure Public as well as MS Azure
Private in place for a few years now. We have had this
GTT takes all AUP violations extremely seriously. Any offending parties mentioned in this thread
have been dealt with accordingly, and GTT now considers the matter resolved from its side.
On 6/25/2018 9:49 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Sometimes I see stuff that just makes me shake my head
Hi Craig,
Microsoft apologizes for your routing issue. Our Wide Area Networking and
Express Route teams were already aware of this issue from your ticket. I
have communicated with their leadership, and they are working on a fix for
you.
Please feel free to contact me at
My VT52 does not do fonts ...
---
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>-Original Message-
>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Hamel
>Sent: Wednesday, 27 June, 2018 14:54
>To:
I ain't friday, but: There is no RFC for the Sarcastica font yet?
PS: Our little adventure in BGP who-done-it (a few weeks back)
burned about 25-30h man hours estimated. Should have been sub 5 hours
if 1 guy would have cooperated instead of ignoring the issue.
-
Alain Hebert
Why would we need an RFC for Comic Sans?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Alain Hebert
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 1:50 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of Cogent, GTT, and
Level3
I ain't friday, but: There is no RFC for
Hi,
could somebody of AS2386 contact me off-list? It seems that you accept
prefixes 12.139.62.0/24 / 12.139.63.0/24 with a wrong origin AS.
Regards
André
--- j...@instituut.net wrote:
People - please just stop the off topic chatter. It is
ludicrous that a thread about bgp hijacks morphed into
font discussions.
Either contribute to the operational issue at hand by
evaluating your terms & conditions (or abuse policies)
and applying them to
hey all,
while I'm in no place to make demands or requests of anyone, like many of
you I have this thread on "loud". it may be beneficial to add a
"-discussions" for when threads go off topic. outages implemented something
similar and (for the most part) squelched the "me too" and off-topic
> People - please just stop the off topic chatter. It is ludicrous that a
> thread about bgp hijacks morphed into font discussions.
>
> Either contribute to the operational issue at hand by evaluating your terms
> & conditions (or abuse policies) and applying them to your operations, or
> remain
I suppose next you'll be telling me to get rid of
my CRT when it works just fine? Black background,
white text. :)
scott
People - please just stop the off topic chatter. It is ludicrous that a
thread about bgp hijacks morphed into font discussions.
Either contribute to the operational issue at hand by evaluating your terms
& conditions (or abuse policies) and applying them to your operations, or
remain silent.
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
"we are not the internet police" right? (
Indeed. Aid and abet would be a more accurate description.
-Dan
On 26/Jun/18 20:31, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Authoritative list of shame with supporting evidence? (Yes, I assume there
> isn't one and that one would have to be created.)
>
> Many network operators aren't going to know who's supposed to be on that list
> and who isn't.
I tend to agree - I
On 27/Jun/18 04:18, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Oh dear. The problem with sarcasm is that it falls flat if people don't
> realize you're being sarcastic.
Text-based messaging is terribly reliable at helping miss the point...
It's a good things our kids of today call each other on the
On 28/06/2018 04:43, Randy Bush wrote:
>> People - please just stop the off topic chatter. It is ludicrous that a
>> thread about bgp hijacks morphed into font discussions.
>>
>> Either contribute to the operational issue at hand by evaluating your terms
>> & conditions (or abuse policies) and
the "please" distributes to both clauses and the difference is a matter of
style rather than substance.
job's point is sound and correct.
please try to respect his firm suggestion.
thanks,
t
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> --- j...@instituut.net wrote:
> People -
20 matches
Mail list logo
