I just got one of these and have not posted in a long time. They must be
crawling archives.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:34 AM Blake Hudson wrote:
> William Herrin wrote on 5/24/2019 1:22 PM:
> > If you drop the /24, you break the Internet when my connection to
> > CenturyLink is inoperable.
>
> Not really. The remote networks that drop visibility to your /24
> announcement still have a
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 06:34:25PM +0300, Scott Christopher wrote:
> https://marc.info/?l=nanog=1=2 and https://lists.gt.net/nanog/
> mangle email addresses in the headers but do nothing about email addresses
> that are quoted / attributed in the body.
There is zero, as in 0.0, point in
On 5/24/19 4:11 PM, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
I guess you don’t get Comcast abuse reports, below is an example:
"e7f05f85ba44ad3393e7b086eed202ee b2cca3a3ae3825c36999e12722e83830"
,
"Ed d95a762f93c99703afe76d25f1679ea4"
Those look like they are probably MD5 hashes (I'm guessing) of names.
So
Rich,
Comment’s inline:
On May 24, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 06:34:25PM +0300, Scott Christopher wrote:
>> https://marc.info/?l=nanog=1=2 and https://lists.gt.net/nanog/
>> mangle email addresses in the headers but do nothing about email addresses
>> that
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:29 AM Mike Hammett wrote:
> If networks are going to make unconventional announcements, I'm not
> concerned if they suffer because of it.
>
No, no no. You're not getting it.
I'm a customer of Verizon. I'm a customer of CenturyLink. I get a /24 from
CenturyLink and
William Herrin wrote on 5/24/2019 1:22 PM:
If you drop the /24, you break the Internet when my connection to
CenturyLink is inoperable.
Not really. The remote networks that drop visibility to your /24
announcement still have a default route. They just just leave the
decision of the best
So sheer coincidence. Literally.
—Sandy
> On May 23, 2019, at 7:07 PM, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
> * sa...@tislabs.com (Sandra Murphy) [Fri 24 May 2019, 00:28 CEST]:
>> And it arrived oddly coincident with my visit to the cvent registration
>> page. Any others who had that coincidence?
>
> No,
Same thought here, yet I tried to report a wrong GeoIP subnet for my AS
multiple times on that form. Never got feedback nor did they made any
correction.
On 5/24/19 5:27 AM, Patrick Schultz wrote:
Seems to be more end-user oriented rather than targeted at netadmins.
There's no real contact
All-
I have a contact and should hopefully be able to resolve the issue. Thank you!
Conrad
> On May 23, 2019, at 10:52 AM, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone have a Grande Communications Contact?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Conrad
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
Question: Is the member list with email addresses public?? Otherwise, one has
to wonder how they got these addresses?
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant
Author: Section 6 of the
Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of
the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply
records the addresses of persons posting to the list. They then
get spammed.
- Brian
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:07:28AM -0600, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
> Question: Is the member list with email addresses public?? Otherwise,
> one has to wonder how they got these addresses?
https://marc.info/?l=nanog=1=2 and https://lists.gt.net/nanog/ mangle email
addresses in the headers but do nothing about email addresses
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
> > Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of
> > the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply
> > records the addresses of persons posting to the list. They
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:08 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
wrote:
> Question: Is the member list with email addresses public?? Otherwise,
> one has to wonder how they got these addresses?
>
Everyone who posts does so with an email address that becomes known to
everyone who subscribes and
NIST NCCoE will host a workshop on Security for IPv6 Enabled Enterprises. The
focus will be to identify and develop plans to address security challenges /
barriers to full IPv6 deployment in enterprise settings.
Please see the call for participation below for more details and to register.
Almost always indiscriminately. They probably would be wise to avoid mailing
lists of sys admins, network admins, etc., but they don't. *shrugs*
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
> Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of
> the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply
> records the addresses of persons posting to the list. They then
> get spammed.
I rather
On 5/24/19 11:36 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of
the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply
records the addresses of persons posting to the list.
If networks are going to make unconventional announcements, I'm not concerned
if they suffer because of it.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Sabri Berisha"
To: "Ross
Hi,
They can, but they don't necessarily have to. In the example I mentioned, there
was a private peering between them. Well, until very recently. My point being
that it's not always black and white, and sometimes deaggregation is necessary
for operational purposes.
That's not to excuse
An interesting development: my posting to this list a few minutes
ago seems to have triggered an autoresponder asking me to confirm
the issuance of a support ticket by Liquid Web, whoever they are.
- Brian
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
> > > Anne, the
22 matches
Mail list logo
