Re: MAP-E

> The cost of sharing IPs in a static way, is that services such as > SonyPlaystation Network will put those addresses in the black list, > so you need to buy more addresses. This hasn’t been the case for > 464XLAT/NAT64, which shares the addresses dynamically. A

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

On 3/Aug/19 03:14, Brandon Martin wrote: >   > > How are they handling optical power balancing across amplifiers and > such?  Do they just trust the customer to provide light at the power > levels agreed upon?  Bulk attenuate the entire "spectrum" > automatically?  Monitor and drop the whole

Re: OT: Tech bag

I switched up to a backpack from this company: https://missionworkshop.com/collections/backpacks they have modular packs, so I keep various things in the modules, and they can go onto their packs. On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:41 PM Brian Knight wrote: > About a year ago, I switched from a

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

On 8/3/19 6:58 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: We are seeing requests from as low as 600km, up to 1,600km, all the way to 7,000km. Those are definitely longer distances than I was inquiring about. I was asking for distances in the range of more like 100km. Those distances are firmly into the

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 12:58:01 +0200, Mark Tinka said: > On 3/Aug/19 03:14, Brandon Martin wrote: > > � I've inquired with a few metro operators in my area about something > > like this, albeit a few years ago, and I got a pretty hard "no way > > we'd ever do that" out of them presumably for the

Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

Hi all, A friend of mine is trying to set up a network in a location where there is no fiber (or copper) for many miles. As bandwidth requirements are low (<1M for the foreseeable future) but uptime is important, he was looking at using multiple cell modems from separate carriers as redundant

Re: Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

On 3/Aug/19 23:09, Ross Tajvar wrote: > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 4:30 PM Brian Henson > wrote: > > If we had a location (or at least a part of the world) we might be > able to recommend a little better.  > > > This is in northern Africa. Hmmh - normally, when

Re: Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

Feel free to open live.infrapedia.com on mobile. Click on share location icon. And it will show 3D view of any fiber near by. We are thinking about adding wireless networks too and maybe overlaying national cell phone coverage maps On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 14:21 Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On

Re: Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

In a remote area in northern africa if there are no terrestrial ISPs, and there is no budget to build towers for PTP microwave, I don't know if there are any reasonable options. If sufficient funds did exist, my recommendation, if they really want true diversity between two totally different

Re: Spam due to new ARIN allocation

Tim - When you have moment, could you forward both of those Whois spam messages to complia...@arin.net ? Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers] On 2 Aug 2019, at 7:32 PM, Tim Burke mailto:t...@tburke.us>> wrote: We

Re: Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 4:30 PM Brian Henson wrote: > If we had a location (or at least a part of the world) we might be able to > recommend a little better. > This is in northern Africa.

Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?)

On 31 Jul 2019, at 5:31 PM, Scott Christopher mailto:s...@ottie.org>> wrote: ... What I have been saying is that, if ARIN did something so brazen as to revoke Amazon's resources because of some bounced PoC emails, the impact would be *dramatic* and likely lead to the end of ARIN. Just think

[nanog] Cisco GLBP/HSRP question -- Has it ever been discussed to publish fully/in-part the specifications

Cisco has their FHR protocol specifications protected as proprietary IP. * Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP) * Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP) * https://packetlife.net/media/library/3/First_Hop_Redundancy.pdf Apart from the EIGRP specifications. Which has become publicly available

Re: [nanog] Cisco GLBP/HSRP question -- Has it ever been discussed to publish fully/in-part the specifications

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2281 I don't think any work for GLBP exists in IETF. On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 16:16, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote: > > Cisco has their FHR protocol specifications protected as proprietary IP. > > * Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP) > * Hot Standby Router Protocol

Re: [nanog] Cisco GLBP/HSRP question -- Has it ever been discussed to publish fully/in-part the specifications

Saku Ytti wrote on 03/08/2019 15:49: I don't think any work for GLBP exists in IETF. A shot in the dark. Correct. https://www.google.com/#q=%28"GLBP"%7C"Gateway+Load+Balancing"+Protocol%7C"Global+Load+Balancing"+Protocol%29+AND+inurl%3Adatatracker+AND+inurl%3Aietf (My IETF history is short.

Re: Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

If we had a location (or at least a part of the world) we might be able to recommend a little better. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ross Tajvar wrote: > Hi all, > > A friend of mine is trying to set up a network in a location where there > is no fiber (or copper) for many miles. As bandwidth

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

On 3/Aug/19 17:04, Valdis Kl ē tnieks wrote: > I'm having a hard time seeing any of those distances as being "metro" as > opposed to long-haul.. or did they change the definitions again while I wasn't > paying attention? I was answering Brandon's query re: spectrum over distance. The OP's

AWS latency is Asia-Pacific

Is anyone else seeing increased latency both within AWS and transit in the Asia-Pacific region? We normally see 90-100ms between Aus and Sing within AWS, for the past 18 hours or so this has jumped up to 190ms - even for internal VPC-VPC traffic. Transit from Aus to Sing (3rd party endpoints)

Re: Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

Any existing WISPs? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Ross Tajvar" To: "North American Network Operators' Group" Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2019 2:30:43 PM Subject: Best ways to

Re: Best ways to ensure redundancy with no terrestrial ISPs

Not that I know of, especially given the location. I'll look into it though. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 3:42 PM Mike Hammett wrote: > Any existing WISPs? > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > >