Google also has a portal where you can provide a link to a self-published csv
geofeed, which is used for some but not all products served from their CDN
infrastructure.
https://isp.google.com/geo_feed/
They're also working on getting the format standardised in the IETF. I applaud
this,
Colin Legendre wrote on 06/08/2019 17:10:
We updated... Maxmind, DB-IP, IP Info, IP Geolocation, IPHub. IP2location
Any others we should update?
$DAY_JOB previously had a case. Were it was necessary to contact Akamai.
Because they have their own database.
--
[ have you enabled IPv6 on
Hello,
Anyone by any chance has any contact info for ATU in Albania? Any type of
contact should probably be fine, from what I’ve seen, not necessarily
technical.
Thanks,
Antonis
FYI, Bloomberg BusinessWeek published TODAY a 3,200-word article by Felix
Gillette entitled
"Section 230 Was Supposed to Make the Internet a Better Place. It Failed"
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-08-07/section-230-was-supposed-to-make-the-internet-a-better-place-it-failed
Tony
On 8/7/2019 10:50 AM, Tony Patti wrote:
FYI, /Bloomberg BusinessWeek/ published _TODAY_ a 3,200-word article
by Felix Gillette entitled*
"Section 230 Was Supposed to Make the Internet a Better Place. It Failed"*
1000mm deep. APC AR3100 racks are 600mm x 1070mm. APC also makes 1200mm deep
ones, and 750mm wide ones, and both together.
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 04:12:26PM +, Richard McGovern wrote:
> Pete "1000 deep rack"?? Is that fathoms __
>
> Richard McGovern
> Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks
I propose that the RIGHT THING TO DO would be to seek out, promote (to
both customers and the public), and support various curation services
like netnanny.
Promoting the idea that third-party curation is a service one can
obtain into the public discussion can only be good.
--
-Barry
Netnanny is mostly sold for parents to put on their children's access.
You're not thinking this through.
Promote third-party curation, those who never want to see content they
find disturbing can PURCHASE* that service rather than bugging their
congressperson to demand that ISPs provide this
On Wednesday, 7 August, 2019 13:38, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>I propose that the RIGHT THING TO DO would be to seek out, promote
>(to >both customers and the public), and support various curation
>services like netnanny.
IANAP (I Am Not A Psychiatrist) however, persons who, when reading or
On August 7, 2019 at 18:43 cov...@ccs.covici.com (John Covici) wrote:
> Well, I don't want any net nannies sensoring the news I get, any ideas
> the nanny does not like I will never see (?)
Then you wouldn't buy it. Netnanny exists now, do you use it? No?
Would you use it? No. Then nothing
Thank you! Very useful
Certainly i have concerns about the software as well
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:35 PM Brandon Martin
wrote:
> On 8/7/19 11:02 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> > I am looking for some suggestions on alternatives to mx204.
> >
> > Any recommendations on something more affordable
Greetings,
I am looking for some suggestions on alternatives to mx204.
Any recommendations on something more affordable which can handle full
routing tables from two providers?
Prefer Juniper but happy to look alternatives.
Min 6-8 10G ports are required
1G support required
Thanks in advance!
Thank you! Something within 2U (max) form factor :)
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:23 PM Tony Wicks wrote:
> Nokia 7750 sr-1.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* NANOG *On Behalf Of *Mehmet Akcin
> *Sent:* Thursday, 8 August 2019 3:03 PM
> *To:* nanog
> *Subject:* Mx204 alternative
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> I am
If it's not for an US company, then a Huawei NE-20 could be in order. The
entry model fits 2U.
Rubens
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:04 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am looking for some suggestions on alternatives to mx204.
>
> Any recommendations on something more affordable which
If you don't require redundant routing engines, there is nothing from Juniper
that will cost less and have the capacity you require. In fact, there really
aren't any cheaper MX options at all, other than the kneecapped MX80 and MX104
variants. MX204 is really a nice box. I only wish they had a
Nokia 7750 sr-1.
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mehmet Akcin
Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2019 3:03 PM
To: nanog
Subject: Mx204 alternative
Greetings,
I am looking for some suggestions on alternatives to mx204.
Any recommendations on something more affordable which can handle full
On 8/7/19 11:02 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
I am looking for some suggestions on alternatives to mx204.
Any recommendations on something more affordable which can handle full
routing tables from two providers?
Prefer Juniper but happy to look alternatives.
Min 6-8 10G ports are required
1G
It’s a bit more expensive and higher capability (1.2tb vs 400G) than the MX204.
But the form factor and capability is very impressive for a little box.
From: Mehmet Akcin
Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2019 3:30 PM
To: Tony Wicks
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: Mx204 alternative
Thank you! Something
18 matches
Mail list logo
