"Ham eggs bacon and spam?" - MP
Could not resist MUST ... Sing ... SONG!
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:26 AM Mike Hale
wrote:
> Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam!
> Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019, 7:50 AM Mel Beckman wrote:
>
>> Maybe email them directly? Posting to the list
Another vote for Approved here, awesome group of people and very thorough in
their testing and fault analysis. We buy from them for Juniper, Ciena,
Mellanox, Intel and a bunch of other random stuff.
I’ve had mixed results with FS. Some stuff works fine, others we have high
failure rates on
I've got a whole bunch running with no issues.. Mostly MM/850nm though, so
maybe a bit different than their SM stuff. Also have a handful (literally)
of the SM ones, and haven't had any issues (yet).
Only "problem" I've had is a copper SFP from them which may have burned out
and fried a
> Nicholas Warren wrote :
> Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?
I have a few hundreds of them, started buying from them about 3 years ago, not
a single issue so far.
I'm going to buy their box soon, so I could recode a Cisco optic into an HP
one, easier on spares
For the record:
Slander is false *spoken* statements.
Libel is false *written* statements.
HTH, HAND.
> On Sep 20, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Nicholas Warren
> wrote:
>
> Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?
Yes.
> On Sep 20, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Bryan Holloway wrote:
>
> In my travels we see a high failure rate -- higher than I'd like to see --,
> but $boss likes the price, and, as Jason pointed out below, for the price, it
> can be a "successful" business model.
> For someone who doesn't want to deal
We have had some failures with 10G BiDi optics coded for Juniper. We buy a
ton of other stuff from FS but for optics we have moved over to Approved
Optics for everything but active ethernet residential subscribers.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:33 AM Nicholas Warren
wrote:
> Anyone have experience
We have maybe 1:50 DOA, but they’re so cheap, we just throw them out because
it’s not worth the RMA.
That said, I can’t remember the last time we’ve had any of these fail in the
field, or have had any issues with variablity in TX/RX power. We have tens of
thousands of these in the field, from
Everytime you guys change the subject on this pointless thread, you break
my filter. Admins can you please take action on this? Enough is enough.
-Mike Bolitho
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019, 3:21 AM James Downs via NANOG wrote:
> For the record:
>
> Slander is false *spoken* statements.
> Libel is
On 9/20/19 10:43 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> We buy them extensively and have had zero data problems with more than 300
> parts in the field. Some switch/router manufacturers’ firmware poutily
> refuses to let you read snmp stats from any “unauthorized” SFPs modules, and
> some oem salespeople
Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?
Yes. I never have seen a failure in the last few years.
We have used Cisco compatible 1G / 10G DAC, SR, LR, and DWDM.
Buy spares if you are concerned, they are priced so you can.
We do like having spares in a rack drawer.
Thank you,
Kevin McCormick
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On
Biggest issue I've seen is it may work on some Cisco models and not others. I
got their flashing box to just reflash the firmware and that has fixed even
"dead" optics.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Nicholas Warren
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 8:32 AM
To:
We buy them extensively and have had zero data problems with more than 300
parts in the field. Some switch/router manufacturers’ firmware poutily refuses
to let you read snmp stats from any “unauthorized” SFPs modules, and some oem
salespeople lyingly claim that using them voids your warranty,
Had some issues in the past with Juniper-coded LR4 with sporadic
disconnections. Apart from those I don’t have any complaints beyond the odd
DOA.
—Dennis
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:32 Nicholas Warren
wrote:
> Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?
>
Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam!
Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019, 7:50 AM Mel Beckman wrote:
> Maybe email them directly? Posting to the list just gets us all more spam.
>
> -mel via cell
>
> > On Sep 20, 2019, at 5:47 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> >
> > Can you please turn off your
marketing is already prohibited by the rules of the group. It’s up to the
moderators to police.
-mel
> On Sep 20, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Nicholas Warren
> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to opt out of sales contact from those on the list?
> Or is this simply the price to pay for seeking the list's
On 9/20/19 2:31 PM, Nicholas Warren wrote:
Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?
YMMV.
Please report to ab...@nanog.org
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 9:42 AM Mel Beckman wrote:
> marketing is already prohibited by the rules of the group. It’s up to the
> moderators to police.
>
> -mel
>
> > On Sep 20, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Nicholas Warren
> wrote:
> >
> > Is it possible to opt out of
On 9/20/19 8:31 AM, Nicholas Warren wrote:
Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?
I've had no complaints about reliability. In terms of transmit power
and receiver performance, they seem to have a bit more variability than
some of the bigger brands' offerings, but
It boils down to a business case.
In my travels we see a high failure rate -- higher than I'd like to see
--, but $boss likes the price, and, as Jason pointed out below, for the
price, it can be a "successful" business model.
In a nutshell:
For someone on a budget, they're great; buy
Maybe email them directly? Posting to the list just gets us all more spam.
-mel via cell
> On Sep 20, 2019, at 5:47 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> Can you please turn off your salesforce/autoresponder to nanog posts please?
>
> - jared
Is it possible to opt out of sales contact from those on the list?
Or is this simply the price to pay for seeking the list's wisdom?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Barrette
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 11:28 AM
> To: Gary A Mumphrey ; Nicholas Warren
>
> Subject: RE: sfps
Can you please turn off your salesforce/autoresponder to nanog posts please?
- jared
I have had some fail and SFP+ & QSFP28s that my Juniper MC480s refuse to
recognize even though I ordered 'branded Juniper' optics.
99% of my stuff is from FlexOptix (https://www.flexoptix.net/). They are a bit
more expensive but I've had 100% reliability and they have worked in all
systems
26 matches
Mail list logo