Hi Töma,
Thank you for the feedback (that is a good point)!
In our study, we lump both cloud/anycast-based and customer-premise
mitigation solutions together as solutions from DDoS mitigation service
providers.
And we believe if you are well-provisioned with such equipment, you are not
subject to
Hi Roland,
Thank you for your comments and resources. I think you may have
misunderstood our email (we could've made our email more clear --
apologies).
The following is our explanation if we interpreted your email correctly.
What we meant by "may not have necessary capacity" is that routers do
Le 29/12/2019 à 23:49, Michael Thomas a écrit :
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/29/big-barrier-trump-5g-america-089883
An interesting article on the road to 5G that they need to about double
the size of the workforce to roll it out. I expect that this affects
some of you directly.
Hey Nanog,
I am in the process of building out a FTTH proof of concept, and I would really
like to offer each of my customers a /48 of IPv6.
I've been able to announce my /32 to my upstreams, dual-stack all of my
internal infrastructure no-problem, build v6 recursive name servers, etc.
This was
Unfortunately not too much help, but previous discussion on this turned up
fairly empty:
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2019-May/101016.html
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2017-September/092416.html
--
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com
pgp key: B1783
On 15/Jan/20 12:20, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>
>
> Arcep (the regulator) today mentions 5G in 2020 will be mostly an
> improved 4G, not the full plain 5G. (makes think of 4G+ which is
> already widely available since some months).
This is an important point.
> iphone 11 is sold since Septe
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, at 06:15, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2019-May/101016.html
Actually that one DOES contain some information.
TL;DR:
- check the "subscriber" or "broadband" functionality of your gear if it has
something like that - check if the DHCPv6 re
Hi,
>
> Where I am struggling is the Prefix Delegation part. How are most
> folks getting the PD subnets into their IGPs? In my environment I
> don’t run the DHCP server process on the router that is directly
> connected to the clients.
>
Our project dhcpy6d allows to call some command when a prefi
8 matches
Mail list logo
