DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE
Assigned to: BuyGoods Support
On Saturday, 17 October, 2020
00:41, "Tony Wicks" said:
> Well, there is always the MX104 (if you want redundancy) or MX80 if you
> dont. That will give you 80gig wire speed
On Saturday, 17 October, 2020 00:41, "Tony Wicks" said:
> Well, there is always the MX104 (if you want redundancy) or MX80 if you
> don’t. That will give you 80gig wire speed just don’t load it up with
> more than one full table.
Bear in mind that the MX80 is now in the EoL process, you have <4
>
> Again, hopefully Twitter won't
> fall down again during the evening of November 3rd. The digeratti will
> lose thier minds.
>
No offense towards our many friends at Twitter, but I think the best thing
that could happen would be for Twitter to shut 'er down from November 1
through November 6.
Can you be a bit more specific?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 5:34 AM Rod Beck
wrote:
> Please contact me off-list if you have knowledge regarding this subject.
>
> Thanks and Be Well,
>
>
Headers, from my end with the nanog receives removed.
Something going through sendgrid.net, and passes through a mail server
under the control of cl112rm.com.
cl112rm.com reeks of spam.
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@sendgrid.net header.s=smtpapi
DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE
Assigned to: BuyGoods Support
Or what Matt?
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W
I haven't tried one myself, but Dasan Zhone has the M2400 and M3000.
Basically, a whitebox with IP Infusion code on it. New, I think the price
point is sub $2000 to $4000 new. That's a ton of ports for that price
point. Anyone tried these yet?
https://dzsi.com/product-category/mobile-xhaul/
On
DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE
Assigned to: BuyGoods Support
Again, hopefully Twitter won't
fall down again during the evening of November 3rd. The digeratti will
lose thier minds.
No offense towards our many friends at Twitter, but I
Anyone know what the hell this "BuyGoods" crap is on some of the NANOG
messages?
On 10/19/2020 9:55 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
BuyGoods
BuyGoods Logo
BuyGoods Support
*Colton Conor* started this conversation
Monday, October 19th, 2020, 11:55am EDT
--
Brielle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Looks like this recent spammer has been removed from the list. They were
moderated, and using the email address From: or known users.
Thanks,
- --
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Or what Matt?
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443
On 2020-10-16 19:26, Matt Erculiani wrote:
Non-network-related
DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE
Assigned to: BuyGoods Support
I haven't tried one myself, but
Dasan Zhone has the M2400 and M3000. Basically, a whitebox with IP Infusion
code on it. New, I think the price point is sub $2000 to $4000 new.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 07:44:01PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
> In the USA, absent clear and convincing evidence otherwise, I expect any
> outages will be due to the normal things that cause outages on election day.
One of those things is the chronic underfunding of the systems/personnel
DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE
Assigned to: BuyGoods Support
Can you be a bit more specific?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 5:34 AM Rod Beck
DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE
Assigned to: BuyGoods Support
Anyone know what the hell this
"BuyGoods" crap is on some of the NANOG
messages?
On 10/19/2020 9:55 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
> BuyGoods
> BuyGoods Logo
>
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2020, at 3:34 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> I think he means packet captures from an example, voluntarily-tested
> recursive nameserver subject to this attack.
Thanks. We have updated all the report pages with a self-test tool specific to
the network associated with the report.
Thanks to the folks who responded to my messages on and off-list. A
couple of folks have asked me to summarize the responses that I
received.
* Static ACL is currently the best way to protect a multi-homed network.
Loose RPF may be used if bogon filtering is more important, but it does
not
term blocked-ports {
from {
protocol [ tcp udp ];
first-fragment;
destination-port
[ 0 sunrpc 135 netbios-ns netbios-dgm netbios-ssn 111 445 syslog
11211];
}
then {
sample;
discard;
}
}
and i block all external
18 matches
Mail list logo
