I think this "intra-standard", probably using white-boxes, could be an
Open-Standard conducted by an RFC or IANA definition.
Something like:
-> Equipments compliant with RFC WXYZ are able to use Classe E in their
Interfaces without giving pokey messages "reserved for future use".
So, if an
The "RFC" you're looking for is probably
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilson-class-e-02, which was not agreed to
and so has no RFC number. The fundamental issue that was raised during that
discussion was that while repurposing class e would provide a few more IPv4
addresses and so delay
Folks,
We have an IP block I have asked about help on a few times on here.
This is a block we received from ARIN in June of 2020. We have several state
networks here in Indiana dropping this traffic at their firewalls. I have been
working with them since we discovered this
Dnia Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 07:00:47AM -0700, Forrest Christian (List Account)
napisał(a):
> to get them to make this work for selected purposes. Router-to-Router
> links, especially between higher-end routers seems to be one of those cases
> that it might be useful.
BTW, some platforms and
Have you written a state legislature yet? Reach out to your
representative's offices and let them know. That's part of their job,
constituent services. Since they are state government websites, they will
have a little power.
- Mike Bolitho
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 7:15 AM Justin Wilson (Lists)
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 06:53:33AM -0800, Fred Baker wrote:
> The "RFC" you're looking for is probably
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilson-class-e-02
there was/is also 'IPv4 unicast extensions project'
(https://github.com/schoen/unicast-extensions) with a similar idea & approach.
I
Back a little bit ago when the thread about running out of RFC-1918 space
was going on, I was going to make a suggestion about repurposing the Class
E space in the case where one ran out of space, assuming one could get the
vendors on your network to support this address range.
I sort of
It could just be a typo on the LOA. It seems unlikely any ISP would approve a
forged LOA that could readily be debunked by contacting the IP space owner. The
whole point of LOA’s is to facilitate this verification.
-mel via cell
> On Mar 9, 2021, at 10:01 AM, Brian Turnbow via NANOG wrote:
>
That could be Justin, based on the timeline from domain registration to
ARIN Object Creation ( Network and Abuse ) to PeeringDB Contact Update.
That doesn't explain the recent update to Public Peering Info on
2021-03-07T20:35:22 months after the ASN stopped routing any IP space.
The domain name
Hello everyone,
We received a strange request that I wanted to share.
An email was sent to us asking to confirm a LOA from a diligent ISP.
The Loa was a request to open bgp for an AS , that is not ours, to announce a
/23 prefix that is ours.
So basically this entity sent to their upstream a
You are not alone sir, for reasons as yet unknown outlook.com has
recently started blocking my range as well.
If I make progress in contacting someone with clue I will pass that
information along privately.
Sam Moats
On 2021-03-08 16:18, Dan Walters via NANOG wrote:
Good afternoon,
So I'm
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, at 6:13 AM, Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote:
> I [..] was finally told we were not a priority.
> Does anyone have any creative ideas on how to fix this?
You might write them a letter like the following:
Dear $AGENCY,
Pursuant to the Indiana Access to Public Records
If you haven't done this yet - start with the outlook postmaster
troubleshooting documentation and open a support ticket with them.
https://sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com/pm/troubleshooting.aspx
Matt
On 2021-03-09 7:07 a.m., s...@circlenet.us wrote:
You are not alone sir, for
If they had a route record that was close, I Would give them the benefit of
doubt.
They do not however as the only records start with 217. And our IPs are 45.
So It Is very strange. Would you send a LOA without a route record?
Brian Turnbow
Da: Mel Beckman
Here in Brazil we had a similar issue...
The cause here was the lack of maintenance contract between the Firewall
Suppliers and the Government Department.
GeoIPBased Firewall Rule was deployed on the Public Health System in
Brazil, saying:
"To those servers, if IP is not from Brazil, drop!"
Apologies for this shameless plug, but wanted to ask if any folks on this
list who does network/infrastructure security testing? Please to reach back
to me off the list.
Thank you for your time.
- On Mar 9, 2021, at 6:13 AM, Justin Wilson (Lists) li...@mtin.net wrote:
Hi,
> I am at the point I need to give the space back because it is unusable
> to the
> ISP customers. Does anyone have any creative ideas on how to fix this?
Since they are a government entity, a process
I did similar over a bad DNS firewall settings that where dropping queries
causing the initial connection to take minutes. I’d already contacted the
administrator and been told it would be looked into multiple times. After a
several of months without a resolution, I escalated with a
Not everyone uses RRs, and there is also the possibility that their upstream
would register it. Having an RR doesn’t seem definitive either way. I can see
reasons to wait on the RR until ready to receive traffic.
-mel via cell
On Mar 9, 2021, at 11:14 AM, Brian Turnbow wrote:
If they had
Huh
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Mar 9, 2021, at 13:57, Nathanael Cariaga wrote:
>
>
> Apologies for this shameless plug, but wanted to ask if any folks on this
> list who does
RPKI can be very useful to mitigate an attempt.
I used to process IP LOAs all the time. I never saw a RR attached but
usually we did a check against the RIR just to make sure (because we
made access-list per interface as well)
On 3/9/2021 1:42 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
Not everyone uses RRs,
Your asking if anyone does it or your offering your services?
-jim
On Tue., Mar. 9, 2021, 3:56 p.m. Nathanael Cariaga,
wrote:
> Apologies for this shameless plug, but wanted to ask if any folks on this
> list who does network/infrastructure security testing? Please to reach back
> to me off
I'm looking for someone if anyone from this thread does it.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:05 PM jim deleskie wrote:
>
> Your asking if anyone does it or your offering your services?
>
> -jim
>
> On Tue., Mar. 9, 2021, 3:56 p.m. Nathanael Cariaga,
> wrote:
>>
>> Apologies for this shameless plug,
You may also try the mailops list.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 12:55 PM Matthew V wrote:
> If you haven't done this yet - start with the outlook postmaster
> troubleshooting documentation and open a support ticket with them.
>
> https://sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com/pm/troubleshooting.aspx
24 matches
Mail list logo
