Colt is a good option if you’re seeking wavelengths. For transit we use a mix
of the other carriers, pccw included but we go through the wholesale side and
not hkt which is the domestic arm of pccw and they are ridiculously expensive.
> On Dec 17, 2021, at 13:13, Eric Dugas via NANOG wrote:
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Gobal
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
Dear Nanog,
Knowing how challenging it is to apply new technologies to current
networks, in a collaboration between ETH, Princeton University, and
University of Virginia, we constructed a system that provides security
benefits for current Internet users while requiring minimal changes to
Nanog,
Currently my organization uses PCCW which we pay through the nose for and I'm
looking to cut them. This was put in place before me. I was informed that PCCW
is "the carrier" in Hong Kong but based on my analysis I'm not sure that's the
case. My analysis of carriers such as Lumen and
Looking glass pings from Lumen to my gear behind PCCW = 1ms, immediate handoff.
Looking glass pings from Lumen -> Google (216.239.38.120), immediate handoff.
Some CDNs\cloud are 30 ms away, like you said Tokyo or Singapore.
My main concern is the eyeball networks. Is PCCW the main carrier for
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:51 PM Adrian Perrig wrote:
> Dear Nanog,
>
> Knowing how challenging it is to apply new
I am in no way an expert in APAC but all of the IP carriers I have in NA
are present in HK: Cogent, Tata, Telia, Zayo.
My guess is a good portion of the interconnections with other IP carriers,
CDNs and such will be either in Singapore or Tokyo.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:56 PM nanoguser99 via
Hi all,
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 19:50, Adrian Perrig wrote:
> other proposed approaches such as RPKI that only protects a route’s origin
> first AS, or BGPsec that requires widespread adoption and significant
> infrastructure upgrades.
>
For both RPKI-based BGP Route Origin Validation and
Eric, none of the carriers you mention in HK has local connection, other HK
ISPs will route to US if they don’t peer with you.
Currently we are using NTT and Telstra, which has good connectivity in Asia
except mainland China.
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Eric Dugas
via NANOG
Sent: Saturday,
PCCW / HKT are the main networks for eyeball HKT ASs feed into AS3491 which is
the international arm, PCCW global if you will.
> On Dec 17, 2021, at 14:05, nanoguser99 via NANOG wrote:
>
>
> Looking glass pings from Lumen to my gear behind PCCW = 1ms, immediate
> handoff. Looking glass
the way i think of it is that
rpki-based rov is a thousand points of light, each independently
having a specified security property.
rpki-based bgpsec forms islands of varied sizes, each island having
a specified security property (quite different from that of rov).
islands
Adrian,
//Speaking as RTGWG co-chair
As commutated to SCION proponents before, a detailed presentation at IETF RTGWG
would be a good starting point.
Please consider doing so at the upcoming IETF113.
The best way is to subscribe to rtgwg mailing list and respond to chairs email
request for
PCCW can be very competitive….. if you can find the right people and have
the volume. They are a lot easier to deal with (vs Telstra/NTT)
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 06:09 David Guo via NANOG wrote:
> Eric, none of the carriers you mention in HK has local connection, other
> HK ISPs will route to
13 matches
Mail list logo
