Re: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes)

2022-03-03 Thread Jorge Amodio
I believe it is a proper response, besides that it is not right for ICANN to get in the middle of this type of conflict, in situations like this, increasing the flow of real information counters the flow of misinformation. -J On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 7:05 AM John Curran wrote: > ICANN response

ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes)

2022-03-03 Thread John Curran
ICANN response request from the Ukraine regarding various DNS interventions – https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-fedorov-02mar22-en.pdf FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 2 Mar 2022, at 1:01 AM, John Curran

Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine

2022-03-03 Thread Dorn Hetzel
One hopes there is some respectable, perhaps even paranoid, encryption on his control functions. On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 6:41 PM Mike wrote: > You guys are missing the obvious. Russia isn't going to attack starlink in > space, they are going to take over it's command and control functions and >

Re: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes)

2022-03-03 Thread Brian R
John, Thank you for these. I'm glad to hear the stance on both of these. Brian From: NANOG on behalf of John Curran Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 5:04 AM To: Nanog Subject: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes) ICANN response request from the Ukraine

Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine

2022-03-03 Thread Matthew Petach
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022, 07:17 Dorn Hetzel wrote: > One hopes there is some respectable, perhaps even paranoid, encryption on > his control functions. > >> Talk about timely! We just had a very nice presentation about this in Austin:

Re: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes)

2022-03-03 Thread Jason Kuehl
Yep, I completely agree. I also think if they had done anything else, it would have been a reputation-ending. On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 8:19 AM Jorge Amodio wrote: > > I believe it is a proper response, besides that it is not right for ICANN > to get in the middle of this type of conflict, in

Saw 40-45% packet loss on both Lumen and ATT MPLS backbones

2022-03-03 Thread Shahid Shafi
Wondering anyone else noticed it and the loss lasted approx 10 mins. I am wondering if one of our routers misbehaved or was there an actual SP loss?

Re: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes)

2022-03-03 Thread Sean Donelan
https://www.icrc.org/en Convention (V) respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907. CHAPTER I : THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF NEUTRAL POWERS - ART. 8. Art. 8. A neutral Power is not called upon to forbid or restrict the use