Am 27.02.23 um 01:35 schrieb Grant Taylor via NANOG:
On 2/25/23 3:09 AM, Tore Anderson wrote:
I suggest you get in touch with the fine folks at NLNOG RING and ask it
they would be interested in setting this up on the 600+ RING nodes all
over the world. See https://ring.nlnog.net/.
Similarly
FRR hasn’t implemented RFC4364 (nor planning to my knowledge (unless someone
comes and codes it ;-))
I believe - Arccus has implemented it (Keyur to confirm).
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Feb 26, 2023, at 22:58, Paul Rolland wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 17:46:42 -0300
>> Douglas Fischer
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:57 AM Denis Fondras wrote:
> Le Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:16:13AM -0700, Chris Grundemann a écrit :
> > Update: The survey has received almost 4 dozen responses already!
> >
> > Of course, for the most meaningful results possible, I'd like to see that
> > about 10x
On 2/27/23 1:13 AM, Rolf Winter wrote:
But feedback from the operational community on this would be
valuable. Our reverse traceroute currently restricts the server to
trace back to the issuing client. We did this for security reasons.
I understand the motivation for your team's caution /
Le Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:16:13AM -0700, Chris Grundemann a écrit :
> Update: The survey has received almost 4 dozen responses already!
>
> Of course, for the most meaningful results possible, I'd like to see that
> about 10x higher.
>
Don't expect too much when you need a Google account to
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 2:30 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
> Having the opt out is nice, but if I am being completely honest, it gives
> me pause as to what the intent of this survey is in the first place.
>
> I perhaps may be hyper cynical, but those feel like a straight line
> towards the standard
>
> Don't expect too much when you need a Google account to answer a survey :)
>
I was also off put by some of the financial questions in there.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 1:57 PM Denis Fondras wrote:
> Le Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:16:13AM -0700, Chris Grundemann a écrit :
> > Update: The survey
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:15 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> I was also off put by some of the financial questions in there.
>
The financial questions (2 of them) both allow opt-out if that is a
sticking point. They are also both as vague as possible (large ranges, not
exact figures) while still
Having the opt out is nice, but if I am being completely honest, it gives
me pause as to what the intent of this survey is in the first place.
I perhaps may be hyper cynical, but those feel like a straight line towards
the standard salesperson line of "look at what you are spending now on FOO
,
> RFC4364 ... I believe - Arccus has implemented it (Keyur to confirm)
i am not keyur and do not play one on the net, but ...
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 10:16, Rolf Winter wrote:
> "https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/;. But, somebody might use your
> server for this. How do people feel about this? Restrict the reverse
> traceroute operation to be done back to the source or allow it more
> freely to go anywhere?
What are
Update: The survey has received almost 4 dozen responses already!
Of course, for the most meaningful results possible, I'd like to see that
about 10x higher.
If you help run a network and have not yet responded, please consider doing
so - it really should only take a few minutes, and we'll all
I dug out this old thread again...
https://www.broadband.io/c/get-broadband-grant-alerts-news/the-brothers-wisp-podcast
What is the request/grant latency in various gpons? DOCSIS-LL has it
below 2ms, I think.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 12:00 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/11/22 22:20, Karsten
13 matches
Mail list logo
