Google PTR?

operators community to at least get an answer on some of the IPs? It's very frustrating to contend with no PTR records in traces for troubleshooting and the like. Any information (off list or on) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Blair Trosper Updraft Networks North Texas GigaPOP

Google burp

as people complain and try to figure out what's going on. Blair Trosper Updraft Networks The North Texas GigaPOP

Re: Google burp

, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@updraftnetworks.com wrote: I guess I'll be the one to ask...what's going on over at Google? Service interruptions and front-end errors all over the place across what appears to be all services, though Gmail seems to have bounced back up. Google's service disruption

Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

I've found myself becoming a snob about IPv6. I almost look down on IPv4-only networks in the same way that I won't go see a film that isn't projected on DLP unless my arm is twisted. I'm a convert, and I'm glad to see the adoption rate edging up. However, I still scratch my head on why most

Re: Cogent outage?

We've seen BGP resets on our servers in Tampa...with Cogent no longer being the preferred route for outgoing traffic. The preferred path from out DC is now through Hurricane (AS6939). Blair Trosper Updraft Networks LEARN (North Texas GigaPOP) On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Michael Bubb

Comcast Business / Miami, FL

Can someone from Comcast contact me off list to help diagnose a business class issue to do with the Comcast AS and peering to cloud services and outrageously high latency confined to a few adjacent ASes?

Google Public DNS having issues.

...seems to be having trouble as reported by Systems Watch: https://twitter.com/systemswatch/status/299572918936039424 Indeed, it's inaccessible to me from Minneapolis, Tampa, SJC, and Seattle...both 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4. I know it's anycast, so I'm not sure which DCs are affected... Blair

Google public DNS flapping/non-functional

Could someone from Google contact me off list to discuss the public resolvers? I'm getting NXDOMAIN and then a proper response literally one second later. And from there it's just 20 GOTO 10...the resolver seems to be having a psychotic episode, or...at the very least...an identity crisis.

Google Public DNS Problems?

Is anyone else seeing this? From Santa Clara, CA, on Comcast Business...I'm getting SERVFAIL for any query I throw at 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4... Level 3's own public resolvers are fine for me, as are OpenDNS's resolvers. Blair

Re: Google Public DNS Problems?

That's all well and good, but I certainly wouldn't expect nslookup gmail.com or for nslookup google.com to return SERVFAIL On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote: On 2013-05-01, at 12:09, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone else seeing

Re: Google Public DNS Problems?

SIZE rcvd: 104 On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Casey Deccio ca...@deccio.net wrote: On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: That's all well and good, but I certainly wouldn't expect nslookup gmail.com or for nslookup google.com to return SERVFAIL

Re: Google Public DNS Problems?

8.8.4.4 is now replying SERVFAIL whereas 8.8.8.8 is suddenly working fine again... On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.comwrote: Goes all the way up to the A root server before failing spectacularly. Europa:~ blair$ dig +cd @8.8.8.8 google.com A ; DiG 9.8.3

Re: Google Public DNS Problems?

Traceroute is getting the right place and 8.8.8.8 is working, though :) On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: On May 1, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote: Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: Goes all the way up to the A root

Re: above.net issues

I've been seeing it all day from inside AS19108...in direct connection to a (huge frustration and) disruption of service from my end to AWS/EC2. On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Joe Williams williams@gmail.com wrote: Oops, this was intended for the outages list but I suppose this list works

Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8

Not to mention Ford Motor Company has 19.0.0.0/8, and there are no announcements for it whatsoever. There are other /8s like it...lots of them early allocations. Why ARIN doesn't revoke them is frankly baffling to me. On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: When

google mail problems?

=statusts=1372272841152 -- Blair Trosper Weather Data / Updraft Networks blair.tros...@updraftnetworks.com blair.tros...@updraft.us NOC: 512-666-0536

google troubles?

Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google services. Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately. It's fine for me, but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to the Google Apps Status page, everything is fine. It's anecdotal, but it would seem

Facebook over IPv6

Could someone @ Facebook kindly drop me a line? Your site appears to be riddled with problems on the IPv6 side (whereas it's demonstrably fine on v4). Much of the static JavaScript content being served off your IPv6 CDN is corrupt, missing, or perhaps just outdated. It's preventing the page

google / massive problems

Can someone from Google Drive or Gmail contact me off-list? The sign in services and applications are outright down trying to use them in Chrome. Trying to contact enterprise support via several numbers just results in an immediate disconnect. The App Status page shows no problem, but Twitter

Re: google / massive problems

for Business -- Drive and Gmail working as expected. On Wednesday, October 9, 2013, Blair Trosper wrote: Can someone from Google Drive or Gmail contact me off-list? The sign in services and applications are outright down trying to use them in Chrome. Trying to contact enterprise support via

comcast ipv6 PTR

Does anyone know why (or can someone from Comcast explain why) there is no PTR on their residential/business IPv6 addresses?

Re: comcast ipv6 PTR

, but I suspect that Comcast isn't doing anything that sophisticated. On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Robert Webb rw...@ropeguru.com wrote: On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:41:50 -0500 Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net wrote: Once upon a time, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com said: Does anyone know

Re: comcast ipv6 PTR

True, but the location information, at least the state, is quasi-helpful. You may be right about PTR being a mistake, but I guess my mind approaches it from a practical, quasi-GeoIP approach. IPv6 seems to be somewhat chaotic in that realm. Plus, with web applications and services, accurate

Re: comcast ipv6 PTR

That gets to the core of the original question. I figured there must be a reason for the conscious omission. However, I've noticed also that Comcast hasn't bothered to give PTR to their routers, either. I think that's a horse of a different color. Leaving out PTR on the last hop for the

ipv6 and geolocation

Everyone loves IPv6, and it's a fantastic technology. However, I've been pondering a few quirks of v6, including the low priority of PTR, but I have a question I want to throw out there: Do you think IPv6 geolocatoin (GeoIP) will ever be viable? If so, when do you think this will happen? If

Re: ipv6 and geolocation

I meant that PTR isn't a priority for ISPs. A la Comcast's rollout of IPv6 lacks PTR, as does Google in general for v4 and v6 (even though they have it internally). On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote: On 2013-10-22, at 15:16, Blair Trosper blair.tros

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

I'm torn on this. On one hand, it seems sinister. On the other, it's not only what the NSA is tasked with doing, but it's what you'd EXPECT them to be doing in the role as the NSA. I'm not saying it's right or wrong...it creeps me out a little, though...but these are the kinds of things we have

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

for different reasons. On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.comwrote: I'm torn on this. On one hand, it seems sinister. On the other, it's not only what the NSA is tasked with doing, but it's what

Amazon help

Can someone from AWS/Amazon netops contact me off-list for help an issue?

Google GCE

Can someone from GCE contact me off list? Your service is a big pile of 503s from multiple locations and from multiple servers. The console is inoperable and instances are unreachable. I'm getting sent across the country to a VIP in LAX. A friend in California is getting a VIP in Hong Kong.

Re: gmail.com - 550 error for ipv6/PTR ?

FWIW I do know there was a MASSIVE failure last night around 0800 UTC with Google's DNS system, and it caused their routing to not only go bat shit insane, but also for the edge nodes that serve their content to return largely 503 errors (service unavailable) for several hours. It wasn't until a

Re: gmail.com - 550 error for ipv6/PTR ?

Possibly related, a lot of 503 errors are starting to show up in the javascript served by Google inside Gmail...reminds me of the issue in the early morning hours (US time)...very similar to what I'm starting to see on the front end. I've not had any IPv6 emails bounce, but I do have some that

Amazon network contact

Could someone from Amazon Web Services contact me off list? You appear to be having connectivity problems on the private network (10.0.0.0/8) at US-EAST-1 between two or more zones, causing dozens of alarms and failures over the last 2-3 hours...however, there is no notation on the status page or

Comcast transit problems?

I'm being inundated with reports from Comcast customers in various markets about their inability to reach anything on AWS. For example, we have a few people in Atlanta that are all having this issue. What's more, they're having weird issues reaching things like Twitter or RingCentral (while

Re: Comcast transit problems?

, but Level3 is having issues in Atlanta. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:07, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: I'm being inundated with reports from Comcast customers in various markets about their inability to reach anything on AWS. For example, we have a few

YouTube contact? (IPv6 streaming broken)

Can someone from YouTube/Google give me a shout off list? The HTML5 player is getting a 204 No Content error when it sends the stream request via IPv6...but works fine on IPv4. Confirmed from multiple locations in the US.

Re: YouTube contact? (IPv6 streaming broken)

Specifically: - 2001:4860:400b:c01::64 returns a 204 - 2607:f8b0:4002:10::8 is about 50/50 between a 204 and 200 On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.comwrote: Can someone from YouTube/Google give me a shout off list? The HTML5 player is getting a 204 No Content

AWS Outage

Can someone from AWS contact me off-list? You have an entire availability zone completely offline at us-east-1 that hasn't been detected, and it's been down for 20 minutes.

YouTube CDN down?

Suddenly having an inability to play YouTube videos over IPv4 and IPv6 from multiple ASNs in multiple locations in the United States. Tried multiple operating systems and browsers...all have the same issue. (The very few that do play stall out, even though they're buffered.) Is this just me, or

Re: YouTube CDN down?

: On 09/29/2014 05:12 PM, Blair Trosper wrote: Suddenly having an inability to play YouTube videos over IPv4 and IPv6 from multiple ASNs in multiple locations in the United States. Tried multiple operating systems and browsers...all have the same issue. (The very few that do play stall out, even

GApps admin = rogered

Just a heads up to our friends at Google Apps. Despite the status page saying all is peachy: http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=env=status ...the administration page for any Google Apps for domains is totally rogered. It's either an endless redirect loop or a deluge of errors. I'd call for

Re: [outages] GApps admin = rogered

will provide more information shortly. Users are seeing the Admin console refresh continuously on loading. On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Blair Trosper via Outages outa...@outages.org wrote: Just a heads up to our friends at Google Apps. Despite the status page saying all is peachy: http

AWS Contact

Could someone from AWS contact me off-list.

Re: Level 3 issues in Miami/West Palm Beach

/2015 03:18 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:52:49 -0600, Blair Trosper said: All packets traveling through customer edges and routers in Miami/Daytona seem to be incurring *extraordinary* latency (4+ seconds) all of a sudden. I'm impressed that the routers have

Re: Comodo

Seconded. They were blocked two weeks ago on my many numbers after I filed a complaint with the FTC here in the US...quite a fall from grace indeed. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote: This is a one off message and I will not reply to any public posts. But

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

Might be ill-advised since AWS uses it themselves for their internal networking. Just traceroute to any API endpoint from an EC2/VPC resource or instance. :) On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Måns Nilsson mansa...@besserwisser.org wrote: Subject: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

own vrf so no need to worry about overlapping anything. Noone heard of Dimension Data Cloud? :) On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: ADDENDUM: They're taking into consideration my suggestion of using IPv6 as a universal internal network so

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

:08 PM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: I have an unimpeachable source at AWS that assures me they're working hard to deploy IPv6. As it was explained to me, since AWS was sort of first to the table -- well before IPv6 popped, they had designed everything on the v4 only. Granted

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

I have an unimpeachable source at AWS that assures me they're working hard to deploy IPv6. As it was explained to me, since AWS was sort of first to the table -- well before IPv6 popped, they had designed everything on the v4 only. Granted, you can get an IPv6 ELB, but only in EC2 classic, which

Re: Level 3 problems in Miami?

* * * 4 0.0.0.0 * * * 5 0.0.0.0 * * * Looks like it can't get any further than the interconnect router between Level 3 and TWC...can someone from Level 3 reach out or look into this please? On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: Also seeing it after

Re: Level 3 problems in Miami?

Level 3 confirms, ticket is open. On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: It's also failing in reverse from the Level 3 LG...doing a traceroute from Miami to myself, this is the result: 1 ae-1-51.edge4.Miami1.Level3.net (4.69.138.76)0.591 ms 7.49

Level 3 problems in Miami?

Anyone else having massive trouble getting to endpoints beyond core routers in Miami on Level 3? I'm cut off (packets die) from Miami and Tampa after this specific router: po4-20g.ar1.mia2.gblx.net (67.16.134.218) If anyone from Level 3 could reach out, or if anyone knows what's going on and

Re: Level 3 problems in Miami?

Also seeing it after this one: po5.ar1.mia2.gblx.net (67.16.148.102) On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone else having massive trouble getting to endpoints beyond core routers in Miami on Level 3? I'm cut off (packets die) from Miami and Tampa

Level 3 issues in Miami/West Palm Beach

All packets traveling through customer edges and routers in Miami/Daytona seem to be incurring *extraordinary* latency (4+ seconds) all of a sudden. Can someone contact me off list so I can throw you some traceroutes?

AWS Contact

Weird issues with console and various service...can someone contact me off list?

Re: Fixing Google geolocation screwups

No, Google has their own internal system. Doubt MaxMind will help out. This discussions and others like it may lead you in the right direction: https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/websearch/fkyem9xUKOQ On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn aa...@heyaaron.com wrote: You

Re: Fixing Google geolocation screwups

PM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: No, Google has their own internal system. Doubt MaxMind will help out. This discussions and others like it may lead you in the right direction: https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/websearch/fkyem9xUKOQ On Tue, Apr 7, 2015

Re: How long will it take to completely get rid of IPv4 or will it happen at all?

I agree with Tony, but at the same time, I also find myself having a hard time rendering an opinion as to timeframe. It'll probably be surprising, but as someone who joined the Internet in the 1990s when IRC was still the pinnacle of what we could do, it's hard to imagine v4 ever going away

Re: looking glass software

://github.com/tmshlvck/ulg/ but did't installed yet. are there any other interesting lg's out there? That's the one we use, but we run it against IOS. Should also work for IOS XE. I think I've seen some folk use it for Junos as well. Mark. -- Blair Trosper p.g.a. S2 Entertainment

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

I can tell you that EC2 Classic and VPC EIPs come from separate netblocks...if that gives you any hints whatsoever. There's no crossover between the two platforms in IP space. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:44 AM,

Re: gmail security is a joke

still think this is a good idea. Best regards. -- Blair Trosper p.g.a. S2 Entertainment Partners Desk: 469-333-8008 Cell: 512-619-8133 Agent/Rep: WME (Los Angeles, CA) - 310-248-2000 PR/Manager: BORG (Dallas, TX) - 844-THE-BORG

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

Disagree, and so does AWS. IPv6 has a huge utility: being a universal, inter-region management network (a network that unites traffic between regions on public and private netblocks). Plus, at least the CDN and ELBs should be dual-stack, since more and more ISPs are turning on IPv6. On Sun,

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: Disagree, and so does AWS. IPv6 has a huge utility: being a universal, inter-region management network (a network that unites traffic between regions on public and private netblocks). Plus, at least the CDN and ELBs should be dual-stack, since

Suddenlink RWHOIS = down

Can someone from Suddenlink contact me offlist (or just handle) for the fact that your rwhois server is offline? Found a referral to rwhois.suddenlink.net:4321. connect: Connection refused

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

antiquated VM provisioning and such to use it if I understood people correctly. Owen -- Blair Trosper p.g.a. S2 Entertainment Partners Desk: 469-333-8008 Cell: 512-619-8133 Agent/Rep: WME (Los Angeles, CA) - 310-248-2000 PR/Manager: BORG (Dallas, TX) - 844-THE-BORG

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: Only EC2 classic has dual stack anything. VPC load balancers (and, indeed, everything about VPC) is IPv4 only. And EC2 classic is being phased out, so dualstack is sort of dying on AWS. However, I do have some solid information that they're

Suddenlink: Texas panhandle

They apparently experienced massive fiber cuts last night and are still 100% down. Anyone know anything about this?

Zayo/AboveNet

Anyone know why Zayo still hasn't renamed the BGP AS network names for all the AboveNet ASNs? Not to poke fun at Global Crossing, but they changed Level 3's AS name in less time (which, if I recall, took over a year to happen...) I don't see Zayo using the Above.net brand anywhere

Re: Zayo/AboveNet

UUNet would have been 40% funnier. (I rounded up from 39.975%) On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net wrote: On Aug 10, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone know why Zayo still hasn't renamed the BGP AS network names for all

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://mixmajor.com/floor.php?yjm3> Blair Trosper

Re: Youtube CDN unreachable over IPv6

sue has been resolved at this > time. If you are still having problems connecting to YouTube CDN > nodes, please feel free to let me know, and I will investigate > further. > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Blair Trosper <blair.tros...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > This was happening

Re: Youtube CDN unreachable over IPv6

This was happening two weeks ago in the Bay Area as well. It happens quite a lot, actually...search for my old threads. I gave up trying to get it noticed. On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Thijs Stuurman wrote: > The problem is on Google's side. From AS15879: > > """ >

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

Confirmed that Hurricane Electric's TunnelBroker is now blocked by Netflix. Anyone nice people from Netflix perhaps want to take a crack at this? On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:15 PM, wrote: > Had the same problem at my house, but it was caused by the IPv6 connection > to HE.

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

t;> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:49 PM Spencer Ryan <sr...@arbor.net> wrote: >> >>> I don't blame them for blocking a (effectively) anonymous tunnel broker. >>> I'm sure their content providers are forcing their hand. >>> On Jun 3, 2016 3:46 PM,

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

It should be pointed out that -- the SPECIFIC accusation from Netflix -- is that people on TunnelBroker are on a VPN or proxy unblocker. The data does not bear that out. Hash tag just saying. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Ricky Beam wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:41:14

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

OP's, while completely masking your actual location. > > > *Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net > *Arbor Networks* > +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m) > www.arbornetworks.com > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Blair Trosper <b

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

...IF (and that's a big IF in the Bay Area at least) you can get the newest modems. Easier said than done. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Spencer Ryan wrote: > Comcast is near 100% on their DOCSIS network (Busniess and residential). > That should be the largest single ISP for

Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

Has happened in Atlanta, too, due to (what I think) was a lookup on the ASN's whois, which wasn't specific: http://fusion.net/story/214995/find-my-phone-apps-lead-to-wrong-home/ On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Chris Boyd wrote: > > Interesting article. > >

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

I would imagine for VOIP that's because all three are country code 1 :) On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Ray Orsini wrote: > On our VOIP service we include US, Canada and Puerto Rico as "local" > calling. > > Regards, > > Ray Orsini – CEO > Orsini IT, LLC – Technology