Let me start out by saying I'm allergic to CGN, but I got to ask the
question:
Some of the CGN providers are coming out with fixed nat solutions for
their IPv6 transition/IPv4 preservation technologies to reduce logging.
This appears to provide for a static mapping of outside ports/IPs to a
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
draft-donley-behave-deterministic-cgn
That's it. Or more specifically, the section of that draft that points to
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6431#section-2.2
Thanks.
-e
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Rob Seastrom r...@seastrom.com wrote:
Ricky Beam jfb...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 08:39:59 -0500, Rob Seastrom r...@seastrom.com
wrote:
So there really is no excuse on ATT's part for the /60s on uverse
6rd...
...
Handing out /56's like Pez
How does team-cymru.org not have a bgp feed of these?
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Note, if you're the PBX guy somewhere, too, that the +1 844 toll free
prefix
was activated at 1200EST today.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Make Election Day a federal holiday:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Randy Bush wrote:
http://comcast6.net/ tells me that the local cmts is v6 enabled. my
modem, a cisco dpc3008, is in the supported products list. so how do
i turn the sucker on?
randy
after a lot of messing about with
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
just to get IPv6 to work correctly.
i would not have had this problem if i had not done the openwrt thing.
the stock netgear would have been fine. i brought this on myself
because i wanted to also run things such as an
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote:
Owen,
Have you ever worked in a corporate environment? Replacing equipment can
be a 5-7 year window and has to be justified and budgeted. Replacing a
piece of equipment because it's an incomplete IPv6 implementation (which
As a reminder, this work will begin in approximately 6 hours.
-e
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Larry J. Blunk l...@merit.edu wrote:
Greetings,
The NANOG Mail server will be transitioning to a
new system next Saturday, April 26th. The maintenance
window for this transition will be
Committee will issue
the NANOG61 call for presentations shortly, marking the availability of the
new tool.
Thanks,
-e
--
Eric Oosting
Network Architect
eoost...@netuf.net | 404-941-6678
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Nicholas Schmidt
nicholas.schm...@controlgroup.com wrote:
I cant find a way to reach out to whoever manages ARO directly so I figure
it would be best to publish this to the list.
Nicholas,
It's normally a good idea to email any questions you have to
At this time, we believe all services have been restored.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Eric Oosting eric.oost...@gmail.com
wrote:
This morning we suffered a hardware failure in our production environment.
The outage affected nanog mail and web services. While mail services have
recovered
This morning we suffered a hardware failure in our production environment.
The outage affected nanog mail and web services. While mail services have
recovered, web services are still down.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
-e
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Christopher Morrow <
morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> '4 MILLION IP ADDRESSES!!!'
>
What is that, an /106?
-e
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Dan Hollis
> wrote:
> > This is what's going on at verizon.
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:46 PM, greg whynott
wrote:
> Team NANOG,
>
> I will summarize once I get to looking at things. This isn't an immediate
> need but with that said I expect to start on it next week. I may not
> evaluate all of them but what I do try I will
14 matches
Mail list logo