On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 08:05:14AM +0100, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
I worry now if it will survive the people that operate it.
I doubt it. When the machines rise up against us they will
kill the current net and carry on with their own IPv8 network.
Purely photonic relativistic cut-through
, people liked 4800G series a lot.
http://forums13.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1276786511413+28353475threadId=1400446
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100
resolving serious scaling limitations that
the Internet faces today. Besides this immediate practical viability, our
network mapping method can provide a different perspective on the community
structure
in complex networks.
[full text snipped]
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 09:27:21PM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
I have a feeling that IP addresses will now be used in ways that people
have not envisioned them being used before. Given a surplus of any
resource, people find creative ways of using it.
Encoding high-resolution geographic
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:51:24AM +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
How do you knew that your local NTP server knew what time it is? (for sure)
By polling as many stratum 1 and 2 time servers as possible. Having
your own stratum 2 server(s) beats nebulous NTP servers out in the big
bad
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:56:17PM +, Tony Finch wrote:
I note that he doesn't actually describe how to implement a large-scale
addressing and routing architecture. It's all handwaving.
I'm probably vying for nanog-kook status as well, but in high-dimensional
spaces blocking is arbitrarily
...@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:10:30AM -0500, Jason Lewis wrote:
Everytime I'm in the market for a device like you describe, it comes
down to the limitations of consumer devices. You can't get all those
things in a low cost solution. I end up rolling my own. My latest
system is this
http://www.networkworld.com/cgi-bin/mailto/x.cgi?pagetosend=/news/2010/120710-chinese-internet-traffic-fix.htmlpagename=/news/2010/120710-chinese-internet-traffic-fix.htmlpageurl=http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/120710-chinese-internet-traffic-fix.htmlsite=printpagensdr=n
Fix to Chinese
This is way offtopic, but I figured this would be a good place to
ask. Anyone using Netgear GSM7352S-200 in production?
http://www.netgear.com/images/GSM7328Sv2_GSM7352Sv2_23Sept1018-10817.pdf
I know, it's Netgear, but how badly does it blow chunks?
Inquiring minds, etc.
(Disclaimer: I am
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 01:33:05AM +, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
Even if every RIR gets to 3 /12s in 50 years, that's still only 15/512ths
of the
initial /3 delegated to unicast space by IETF. There are 6+ more /3s
remaining
in the IETF pool.
That's good news - we need to make sure
/membership/billing/procedure-enduser.html
(other than because they can, I mean).
Owen
And, even if you are an ISP, you only pay the larger of the two fees if you
have both v4 and v6. I'm not sure if that is permanent or not, though.
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:17:11PM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote:
I'm mildly surprised if you think we're going to be done with *this*
mess in a few decades.
I fully agree. But planning/expecting to go through this mess *again* is
insane. -- I hope the lesson has been learned, and we won't
Authority.
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:52:44AM -0500, Eric Gauthier wrote:
I wonder if Skynet upgraded to v6...
http://www.skynet.be/jack-nl/high-tech/dossier_belgacom-bereidt-zich-voor-ipv6?articleId=835562
.be afraid.
Eric :)
http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2011/3/23/4778509.html
Nortel, in bankruptcy, sells IPv4 address block for $7.5 million
by Milton Mueller on Wed 23 Mar 2011 10:30 PM EDT | Permanent Link |
ShareThis
Wake up call for our friends in the Regional Internet Registries. Nortel,
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/10/one-big-cluster-how-cloudflare-launched-10-data-centers-in-30-days/
One big cluster: How CloudFlare launched 10 data centers in 30 days
With high-performance computing, pixie-booting servers a half-world away.
by Sean Gallagher - Oct 19
http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2012/11/uk-scientists-claim-to-develop-2000-times-faster-broadband-via-fibre-optic.html
UK Scientists Claim to Develop 2000 Times Faster Broadband via Fibre Optic
Posted Tuesday, November 6th, 2012 (11:08 am) by Mark Jackson (Score 746)
A team of scientists
, long range links must be improvised
on a case by case basis.
Ben the Pyrate
On Nov 11, 2012 7:47 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
- Forwarded message from chris tknch...@gmail.com -
From: chris tknch...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:07:27 -0500
To: jamie rishaw j
http://anewdomain.net/2012/11/10/nasa-dtn-protocol-bp-protocol-vint-cerf-interplanetary-internet-how-it-works-what-legos-have-to-to-with-it/#
NASA DTN Protocol: Interplanetary Internet, How It Works, What LEGOS Have to
To With It
Author: Gina Smith
NASA is calling it the interplanetary
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:08:15PM -0500, William Herrin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Ammar Salih ammar.sa...@auis.edu.iq wrote:
2- Layer 7 will not be detected by layer 3 devices (routers) .. so
location-based service on layer-3 will not be possible.
Geographic-based layer 3
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:19:48PM -0800, John Adams wrote:
Your proposal doesn't even give people a way to encrypt their location
data; By moving geodata to a portion of the protocol which is not covered
It's not possible to hide location. Anonymity and efficient transport
don't mix. This
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 06:25:47AM -0800, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
Again, where're the compelling IPv6-only content/apps/services?
To answer your rhetorical question, http://www.kame.net/ has a dancing
kame. To my
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:56:52PM -0200, Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
Just for redundancy's sake: No, L3 is **not** the place for this kind of
information. L3 is supposed to be simple, easy to implement, fast to
I agree. You need to put it into L2, and the core usage would
be for wireless meshes.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:46:33PM -0500, Harald Koch wrote:
This also naively assumes that wireless network topology correlates with
geographic location. Any radio engineer (or cell phone user) can explain
why that doesn't work.
Serval has about 200 m line of sight range. In general
LoS
and resolving
current network locations.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
- Forwarded message from George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com -
From: George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:51:57 -0800
To: William Herrin b
(GPSDO for local data center as stratum 1)
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/11/google-spanner-time/all/
Exclusive: Inside Google Spanner, the Largest Single Database on Earth
By Cade Metz 11.26.12 6:30 AM
Each morning, when Andrew Fikes sat down at his desk inside Google
headquarters
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/28/technology/dark-warnings-about-future-of-internet-access.html?pagewanted=print
November 27, 2012
Integrity of Internet Is Crux of Global Conference
By ERIC PFANNER
PARIS — A commercial and ideological clash is set for next week, when
representatives of more
. - Sir William Clayton
--
~Em
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
2012 19:22, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
- Forwarded message from Emily Ozols win...@team-metro.net -
From: Emily Ozols win...@team-metro.net
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:14:08 +1100
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help
-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
- End forwarded message -
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A
, or change password at:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
- End forwarded message -
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/12/05/0115214/itu-approves-deep-packet-inspection
ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection
Posted by Soulskill on Tuesday December 04, @08:19PM
from the inspect-my-encryption-all-you'd-like dept.
dsinc sends this quote from Techdirt about the International
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:36:08AM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Seconded. I was a hold-out for a long time on personal stuff - I trust me,
I'm not paying someone else to trust me - but StartSSL makes a lot of the
pain go away with minimal effort.
because paying for random
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:13:15PM -0800, George Herbert wrote:
I don't know that the discussion is a NANOG-centric one from here on
in, but it's good to have raised the idea.
Something optical, like a 10 GBit/s SR version of TOSLINK
would be nice.
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:43:56PM -0800, Leo Bicknell wrote:
The only place PON made any sense to me was extreme rural areas.
If you could go 20km to a splitter and then hit 32 homes ~1km away
(52km fiber pair length total), that was a win. If the homes are
2km from the CO, 32 pair (64km
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21442348
Fast fibre: A community shows the way
COMMENTS (198)
Lancashire leads way on fast fibre connection
How fast is your home broadband? Seventy to 80 Mbps if you're one of the few
with the very fastest fibre broadband services? Perhaps 10Mbps if
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23309-information-superhighway-approaches-light-speed.html
Information superhighway approaches light speed
18:00 24 March 2013 by Jacob Aron Nothing moves faster than light in a
vacuum, but large volumes of data can now travel at 99.7 per cent of this
http://www.gizmag.com/cudos-fiber-optic-network-capacity/26969/
Closing the gap to improve the capacity of existing fiber optic networks
By Darren Quick
April 7, 2013
Researchers claim to have increased the data capacity of optical networks to
the point that all of the world’s internet
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 06:10:30PM -0400, Andrew Latham wrote:
tl;dr: ARIN predicted to run out of IP space to allocate in August this
year.
Are you ready?
I have sadly witnessed a growing number of businesses with /24s moving
to colocation/aws networks and not giving up their unused
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:47:22AM -0800, Scott Weeks wrote:
In our industry, especially with all the tools we have today, it would seem
that telecommuting would be more accepted, but it's not and I don't
understand
why.
People are social primates, alphas like access to nonverbal cues for
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:25:41PM +, Thorsten Dahm wrote:
Yes, I know, they can call you, or send an Email, but nothing beats the
good old Let's go for a coffee, I'd like to ask you a question.
Some people just put up a dedicated netbook with a permanent
video/audio link (can be a
In future photonic networks (which will do relativistic cut-through
directly in a photonic crossbar without converting photons to electrons
and back) the fiber is not just a transport channel but also a photonic
buffer (e.g. at 10 GBit/s Ethernet a short reach fiber already buffers
a standard
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:33:12AM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ridwan Sami rms2...@columbia.edu
There is no legitimate reason for a user to use BitTorrent (someone
will probably disagree with this).
Yeah, no.
You've clearly never tried to download a
or Unsubscribe: http://MarsHome.org/mailman/options/NSG-d
Hosted by CyberTeams.com and Mars Foundation(tm), http://MarsHome.org
- End forwarded message -
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:18:04PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
As long as we keep using IPv4, we are mostly stopping at /24 and
must stop at /32.
But, see the subject. It's well above moore.
For high speed (fixed time) routed look up with 1M entries, SRAM is
cheap at /24 and is fine at
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:57:10PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
That's one reason why we should stay away from IPv6.
What prevents you from using
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v1/n6/full/ncomms1063.html
with IPv6?
Though I didn't paid $32 to read the full paper, it's like
a
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:25:46AM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
Geographic routing strategies have been all but proven to irredeemably
violate the recursive commercial payment relationships which create
the Internet's topology. In other words, they always end up stealing
bandwidth on links
Claim: 1.4 GBit/s over up to 13 km, 24 GHZ, @3 kUSD/link price point.
http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:22:20AM -0700, Henk Hesselink wrote:
Have you looked at the HP ProLiant MicroServer?
Notice it takes up to 8 GByte ECC memory and supports zfs
via napp-it/Illumos. A hacked BIOS was required to use
the 5th internal SATA port in AHCI mode, maybe that's
no longer
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/04/going-with-the-flow-google/all/1
Going With The Flow: Google’s Secret Switch To The Next Wave Of Networking
By Steven Levy April 17, 2012 | 11:45 am |
Categories: Data Centers, Networking
In early 1999, an associate computer science professor
- Forwarded message from Andrew Lewis and...@pdqvpn.com -
From: Andrew Lewis and...@pdqvpn.com
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:29:05 -0400
To: Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org, liberationt...@lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Syria blackout?
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel
PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
- Forwarded message from Rafael Cresci raf...@cresci.org
-
From: Rafael Cresci raf...@cresci.org Date: Thu, 31 May 2012
14:41:09 -0300 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Syria blackout?
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Customers (from UAE) who have servers with us
yesterday. I am going to do some more
digging. Tor, and some specific types of VPNs still seem to be working
fine.
-Andrew
On 5/31/2012 2:26 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
- Forwarded message from Rafael Cresci raf...@cresci.org
-
From: Rafael Cresci raf...@cresci.org Date: Thu, 31 May 2012
14
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:49:40PM +0200, Peter Lothberg wrote:
I leave the computer kernels out of this for a second..:-)
We have a timescale that runs at constant speed forward it's named
TAI, it is based on the definition on the atomic second.
Notice that in inertial frame dragging
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 06:10:45PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
IMO, leap seconds are a really bad idea. Let the vanishingly few
people who care about a precision match against the solar day keep
track of the deviation from clock time and let everybody else have a
*simple* clock year after
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:26:22AM -0700, Roy wrote:
Remember OpenTime is only for people who want their system clocks to
ignore leap seconds. I don't include myself among the possible users of
OpenTime.
Obviously you need a machine time, which is monotonous, high-resolution
(you don't
reminders. You may ask for a reminder here:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.
Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
- End forwarded message -
--
Eugen
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:48:47AM +1000, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
I think the effort to moderate this particular list would be far to much
effort.
Most mailing lists allow moderation of new list members by default.
Typically, the moderation is removed after the first non-spam post.
This causes
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:52:53AM -1000, William Herrin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com wrote:
A good portable generator is more than $500, and if it's a wide-spread
outage there's not enough portable generators to go around, and if there
were, not
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 08:31:06PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
You MIGHT have paid some other organization for the privilege of transferring
part or all of their registration rights to you.
But in no case did you pay for the addresses themselves unless you are silly
enough to think that a
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 10:59:09AM -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 8/4/12, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 08:31:06PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
onboard (as most smartphones and tablets do).
24 + 24 + 16 bits are just enough to represent
a decent-resolution WGS84
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 10:31:02AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
IPv6 missed a great chance of doing away with all the
central waterfall trickle-down space distribution.
There was no need to fix what wasn't broken.
Let's say I want to plunk down a zero-administration
node somewhere, as an
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:53:48PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
This ignores the many many studies of the idea of geo-based
addressing which have proven its unfeasibility as well as the
I disagree that the studies have looked at the problem
space from the right angle.
fact that not everyone
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 04:00:18PM -, John Levine wrote:
Do you see problems with this scheme? There's considerable
interest and momentum in end user owned routing infrastructure,
including wireless ad hoc meshes across urban areas.
I've seen remarkably little overlap between the people
http://www.wired.com/business/2012/08/ff_wallstreet_trading/all/
Some interesting, network-relevant content there (but for the
neutrino and drone rubbish).
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 05:15:51PM -1000, Michael Painter wrote:
Eugen Leitl wrote:
http://www.wired.com/business/2012/08/ff_wallstreet_trading/all/
Some interesting, network-relevant content there (but for the
neutrino and drone rubbish).
'Rubbish' might be a pretty strong word when you're
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/09/europe-officially-runs-out-of-ipv4-addresses/
Europe officially runs out of IPv4 addresses
RIPE NCC now allocating IPv4 address space from the last /8 netblock
by Iljitsch van Beijnum - Sep 14, 2012 3:20 pm UTC
Earlier today, the RIPE
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:27:04AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
What technology are you planning to deploy that will consume more than 2
addresses per square cm?
Easy. Think volume (as in: orbit), and think um^3 for a functional computers ;)
http://paritynews.com/network/item/325-department-of-work-and-pensions-uk-in-possession-of-169-million-unused-ipv4-addresses
Department of Work and Pensions UK in Possession of 16.9 Million Unused IPv4
Addresses
Written by Ravi Mandalia
Department of Work and Pensions UK in Possession of 16.9
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 03:32:47PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 18/09/2012 15:07, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Department of Work and Pensions UK in Possession of 16.9 Million Unused IPv4
Addresses
unused? sez who? Oh, it said it on the internet so it must be true.
Other than that, I'm
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:57:34AM -0500, Jason Baugher wrote:
Considering the rather extensive discussion on this list of using
quantum entanglement as a possible future communications medium that
would nearly eliminate latency, I don't see how my comment is moot or a
waste.
You need
I'm trying to figure out whether CERNET http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERNET
is part of the official Internet, or is behind the Great Firewall where
access to invididual networks on the public Internet must be explicitly
granted. Anyone in the know?
http://slashdot.org/topic/datacenter/terabit-ethernet-is-dead-for-now/
Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now
by Mark Hachman | September 26, 2012
A straw poll of the IEEE's high-speed Ethernet group finds that 400-Gbits/s
is almost unanimously preferred.
Sorry, everybody: terabit Ethernet looks
Sounds just like CGN.
- Forwarded message from Collin Anderson col...@averysmallbird.com -
From: Collin Anderson col...@averysmallbird.com
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:06:34 -0400
To: liberationt...@lists.stanford.edu
Subject: [liberationtech] The Hidden Internet of Iran: Private Address
that is clear, simple, and
wrong.--H.L. Mencken
- End forwarded message -
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:59:20PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Where's Noel Chiappa when you need him?
(2) The new protocol will use variable-length address for the Host
portion, such as used in the addresses of CLNP,
This also was considered during the IPv6 design phase,
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:10:00PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Above describes your setting for the next protocol. There is not
a lot of leeway in design space, I'm afraid.
Just keep using IPv4.
Masataka Ohta
PS
See
a mesh it won't work.
I'm sorry, but I am very afraid of Central Authority.
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3
.
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
do that.
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Hi,
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
which is obviously bogus. They do have a 168.246.0.0/16
however.
Any tool to look the other two up quickly, without having to
iterate through the entire second octet? Thanks!
--
Eugen
http://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/news/2240035722/Backbone-operators-see-IPv6-connectivity-demand-up-but-little-traffic
Backbone operators see IPv6 connectivity demand up, but little traffic
Internet backbone and wholesale carriers are anecdotally reporting a rapid
rise in demand from their
these people? Thanks!
Regards,
Eugen Leitl
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:34:10AM -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Though it's nice to have why would one *need* 100 Mbps at home? I
Residential broadband is asymmetric, so it's typically more like
6/100 MBit/s, though VDSL and FTTH are also making (slow) progress.
Even with that slow upstream
(or 8.2 for our production
systems).
I have tried the freebsd net mailinglist, but im hoping you lot can help me!
Cheers in advance
Will
- End forwarded message -
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:17:55PM -0700, George Herbert wrote:
Micron has some large-cap SLC drives in the chain for
September/October/ish timeframes.
Ramdisk with rsync or rdiffbackup to spinning storage will do just fine.
Or hybrid zfs pools.
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org
this.
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
# Filtered
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Fraunhofer:
http://www.iaf.fraunhofer.de/de/news-medien/pressemitteilungen/presse-2013-05-16.html
Google Translate:
New world record in data transmission by radio
Press Release 16/05/2013
With a Langstreckendemonstrator between two skyscrapers in Karlsruhe, a
distance of over a kilometer
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:07:57PM -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
Has fingers directly in servers of top Internet content companies,
dates to 2007. Happily, none of the companies listed are transport
networks:
I've always just assumed that if it's in electronic form, someone else is
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:25:35AM -0500, jamie rishaw wrote:
tinfoilhat
Just wait until we find out dark and lit private fiber is getting vampired.
/tinfoilhat
Approaches like http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/04/70619
obviously don't scale to small time operators. But if you
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:10:57AM +0300, Kauto Huopio wrote:
I would add opportunistic STARTTLS to all SMTP processing devices.
What we actually need is working opportunistic encryption
in IPv6, something like
http://www.inrialpes.fr/planete/people/chneuman/OE.html
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 06:35:35PM -0700, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
In the PRISM context, I highly doubt their using Splunk for any kind
of analysis beyond systems and network management. It's not good at
indexing non-texty-things.
What if you need to search for events that were geographically
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:34:28AM -0600, Phil Fagan wrote:
Yeah, I can't imagine there is any real magic there...mystical protocol not
seen over transport.
Compromised NICs can leak info through side channels (timing) but
it's too low bandwidth. For end user devices with backdoors
(remote
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 07:51:22PM -0400, Scott Helms wrote:
Really? In a completely controlled network then yes, but not in a
production system. There is far too much random noise and actual latency
for that to be feasible.
The coding used for the stegano side channel can be made quite
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:34:49PM -0400, Scott Helms wrote:
Is it possible? Yes, but it's not feasible because the data rate would be
too low. That's what I'm trying to get across. There are lots things that
can be done but many of those are not useful.
I could encode communications in
(This may be Wacky Friday, but this one is not tongue in cheek -- the name
Keith Lofstrom should ring a bell).
http://server-sky.com/
Server Sky - internet and computation in orbit
It is easier to move terabits than kilograms or megawatts. Space solar power
will solve the energy crisis. Sooner
/07/13 12:37 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
- Forwarded message from Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi -
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 21:35:58 +0300
From: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google's QUIC
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On (2013-06-29 23:36 +0100), Tony Finch wrote
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:30:24PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote:
How about this - the size of the Internet is just short of 3 billion.
That's the number of people that have access to it. To me, that's a far
more telling number than anything around IP address or Exabytes of data.
Sure enough --
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
