On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
The IPv6 geo databases actually tend to be about on par with the IPv4
ones from what I have seen so far (which is admittedly limited as I don't
really use geolocation services). However, I still think it is important
for
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:27 AM, jamie rishaw wrote:
Three thoughts come to mind.
1) Tech says Charter (according to internal talk) has no v6 deploy plans
until 2013. Someone stop me from pulling out my hair on this -- Does 3q
'13 align with others' plans for v6 deployment ?
I have one
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com wrote:
I too had with nesol years ago. It required special phone calls to
special people to update. Customer support never knew what was going on
regarding or IPvWhat?.
I suspect all of the people there that know
Was participating until we hit a rather nasty load balancer bug that
took out the entire unit if clients with a short MTU connected and it
needed to fragment packets (Citrix Netscaler running latest code). No
fix is available for it yet, so we had to shut it down. Ran for about
9 hours before
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com wrote:
What seems evident, looking at
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a
lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn
quick!
Or ... folks switched it on and then
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote:
So if you are using a Netscaler with SLB-PT (IPv6 VIP balancing to
IPv4 servers), the entire LB is subject to stop working until they get
this fixed.
And this is EXACTLY why we needed World IPv6 Day.
Agreed, right on the
IMHO, it's worse than that. Most sites only added a record for
their website, and frequently didn't for their DNS server. So they
weren't *really* doing a complete IPv6 test, IMHO.
There is a reason for that. First of all, we (my employer) took this
as a brief test to simply see how
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Aw, Jeezus.
No. Just, no.
I think I will get .payme and make sure coke.payme, pepsi.payme,
comcast.payme, etc. all get registered at the low-low price of
$10/year. All I would need is 100,000 registrations to provide me
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Slightly old news, but it looks like Cogent depeered ESnet last week:
http://www.es.net/news-and-publications/esnet-news/2011/important-status-announcement-regarding-cogent-connectivity/
Current traceroutes indicate that ESnet is
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:47 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:15:09 CDT, Robert Bonomi said:
Anybody got draft language for a SLA clause that requires routing 'at least
one hop _past_ the provider's network edge' for every AS visible at major
public peering points
internet connectivity, and that much $ is at stake, you're stupid if you
don't have some redundancy. Nothing works all the time forever.
I can't consider Cogent even a redundant link, since I need two other
upstreams to reach the Internet redundantly.
-cjp
Well, they aren't someone you
I would be much obliged of folks (peers of AS24246 -- InterNAP Hong Kong --
in particular) would adjust their filters to accept 216.239.98.0/24 and
216.231.203.0/24 announced from AS17299 via AS24246. You should also see
those routes from AS17819 but it is the 24246 path that causing me hardship.
morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:41 PM, George B. geor...@gmail.com wrote:
216.231.203.0/24
you don't appear to be on the whois list for that block nor asn... so,
why would someone accept this block on your say-so? Are you asking as
a customer of the ASN
And yeah, I am still associated with my former employer, I'm not on the new
employer's stuff yet.
G
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:41 PM, George B. geor...@gmail.com wrote:
216.231.203.0/24
you don't appear
... which was what
prompted my question originally.
$ whois -h whois.cymru.com 216.239.98.0
AS | IP | AS Name
17299 | 216.239.98.0 | IPASS-4 - iPass Incorporated
that seems kosher though.
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:41 PM, George B. geor...@gmail.com wrote
15 matches
Mail list logo
