The last 5 are, by existing agreement, to be allocated 1 per Regional
registry immediately after the other /8s are exhausted. This was
agreed to some time ago to ensure that no regional was disadvantaged
by timing concerns on applications for space as the IANA exhaustion
approached.
As that has
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:46 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:09:50 GMT, John Curran said:
We had a small ramp up in December (about 25% increase) but that is within
reasonable variation. Today was a little different, though, with 4 times
the normal request rate...
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum iljit...@muada.com wrote:
On 2 feb 2011, at 17:14, Dave Israel wrote:
I understand people use DHCP for lots of stuff today. But that's mainly
because DHCP is there, not because it's the best possible way to get that
particular job done.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
In a message written on Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:55:30PM +0100, Iljitsch van
Beijnum wrote:
Can you explain what exactly the problems with DHCPv6 are that you're
running into that are inherent to DHCP and/or IPv6 host
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
carlosm3...@gmail.com wrote:
Disconnected networks have a bothersome tendency to get connected at
some point ( I have been severely bitten by this in the past ), so
while I agree that there is no need to coordinate anything globally,
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jeffrey Lyon
jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
Pragmatically, compelling the release of a legacy allocation to a
major company could be difficult, however, if the ARIN community were
to draft a resolution to reclaim the space it may have a profound
effect on
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:52 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:39:25 PST, George Herbert said:
It's probably most practical for them to renumber into a subset of
their existing space, collapsing down from the whole /8 into a /10 or
something longer, which would free up
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Fernando Gont ferna...@gont.com.ar wrote:
On 03/02/2011 10:07 a.m., Rob Evans wrote:
You must be kiddin'... You're considering going through this mess
again in a few decades?
I'm mildly surprised if you think we're going to be done with *this*
mess in a few
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins r...@deadfrog.net wrote:
On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
Hi Denys
I doubt it's intentional jamming since I've had the same problem.
Aegis radar is very high power in full radiate mode and as such creates
problems for Low Noise
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
I wish people would actually read RFC 1918.
Category 1: hosts that do not require access to hosts in other
enterprises or the Internet at large; hosts within
this category may use IP
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:08 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:59:12 PST, George Herbert said:
It's easy to say Well, foo on them, but for those of us who provide
services or consulting to those who failed to follow the directions,
we still have to deal with it.
Just
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:54 PM, David Barak thegame...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: R. Benjamin Kessler ben.kess...@zenetra.com
From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herb...@gmail.com]
Let's just grab 2/8, it's not routed on the Internet...
+1
I was consulting for a financial services firm
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljit...@muada.com wrote:
[...] Once we're at 128-bit addresses then we can migrate to IPvA (7 - 9 are
already taken) without much trouble. But then, 32-bit ASes interoperate with
16-bit ones with no trouble and still after a decade the
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Crooks, Sam wrote:
Is it permissible, from a policy perspective, for a multi-homed end user
to announce the numbering resource allocation received from one RIR (for
discussion purposes, let's say ARIN) to
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Fred Richards fr...@geexology.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:47 PM, George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
I have yet to see a broadband provider that configures a network so that
individual nodes in the home network get global IPs.
One huge reason to
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@creative.net.au wrote:
There's a wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AS_7007_incident
.. that a post I wrote up for a local computer club magazine somehow suffices
as primary reference material for.
Even though I think this
Related topic - ACM's CHIMIT (Computer Human Interfaces for the
Management of Information Technology) workshop 2010 was co-located
with the Usenix LISA conference this year
(http://www.chimit10.org/home.html); I was on a panel discussion on
mobile devices in system administration.
This topic and
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Even more suspicious is the fact that there is no organisational
information attached to the request and the sender used a gmail
address. They supplied an Indian telephone number.
it is about this point where i realize that i am
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
You have ignored the probability of disaggregation due to IP trading markets,
especially
given the wild-west nature of the APNIC transfer policy.
Many of the legacy blocks will get dramatically disaggregated in the likely
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:06 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
On 9 Mar 2011, at 07:18, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
one of these curves is steeper than the other.
That's what we wanted for the first one.
We're seeing damage in harbors on the west coast - live imagery of
Santa Cruz harbor with multiple piers broken up, boats loose, boats
sunk, from local geography focusing waves that were only 2-3 foot
surges (personal Ouch - I used to own a boat in that harbor). Phone
reporting from Crescent City
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Jeff Wheeler j...@inconcepts.biz wrote:
It's the same thing that happens if you toss a /8 on an IPv4 LAN and
start banging away at the ARP table, while expecting all of your
legitimate hosts within that /8 to continue working correctly. We all
know that's
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Ryan Malayter malay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 7:47 pm, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
Now getting We re sorry, the Netflix website and the ability to
instantly watch movies are both temporarily unavailable. out of Charter.
Campus getting same routed
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Franck Martin fra...@genius.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net
To: nanog group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 25 March, 2011 9:33:27 AM
Subject: Re: The state-level attack on the SSL CA security model
On Mar 24,
As I said earlier, names' structure does not map to network or physical
location structure.
DNS is who; IP is where. Both are reasonably efficient now as separate
entities. Combining them will wreck one. You're choosing to wreck routing
(where), which to backbone people sounds frankly stark
On Oct 6, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
We can map from host names to ip addresses to routing actions, right?
So clearly they're not unrelated or independent variables. There's a
smooth function from hostname-ipaddr-routing.
No.
Not just no, but hell no at
Ancedotally, for users of an e-gadget company's website, cellphone
company's outbound web proxies, internet games company, and
image-intensive home furnishings website, the CGNs delivered content
faster than the main website could, regardless of increasing its
bandwidth. Latency problems with the
Sorry, at a conference and not paying enough attention to email. My bad.
-george
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Cutler James R
james.cut...@consultant.com wrote:
On Oct 7, 2012, at 4:56 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ancedotally, for users of an e-gadget company's website
management
is at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch) but managed by Vivendra Rode.
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:19 PM, George Herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, multiple reports on the outages list, which you should also join.
Short summary: WI
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Sean Harlow s...@seanharlow.info wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
Maybe because he has 130 sites and 130 truck rolls is not cheap. Also
company policy says no.
You are correct that deploying to a number of sites
Modeled with just simple FTP sessions?
Ugh: they admitted to having MIT backbone packet traces to analyze, and then
used that simple of a simulator...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 23, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Rodrick Brown rodrick.br...@gmail.com wrote:
With coded TCP, blocks
iPhone
On Oct 23, 2012, at 8:57 PM, Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com wrote:
George Herbert wrote:
Modeled with just simple FTP sessions?
Ugh: they admitted to having MIT backbone packet traces to analyze, and then
used that simple of a simulator...
The practical benefits of the technology
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:07 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
corruption!
http://mina.naguib.ca/blog/2012/10/22/the-little-ssh-that-sometimes-couldnt.html
/bill
This is an excellent full-stack debugging war story.
Thanks for posting it, Bill.
--
-george william herbert
Oh, horrors, part of my infrastructure needs raw socket data?
We should ban that, for security. Who needs those pesky switches anyways?
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 6, 2012, at 5:49 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 05:38:32AM
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
From: Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:35 -0600
_
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Does
crossreplying to outages list.
Is anyone ELSE seeing GPS issues? This could well have been an
unrelated issue on that particular PBX.
If this was real, then the mother of all infrastructure attacks might
be underway...
One glitch on tick and tock and one malfunctioning PBX is not
sufficient
On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
.
I've also been looking at an item like this:
http://www.netburnerstore.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=PK70EX-NTP
which is about $300 + misc parts.
Should be well worth it to avoid a 'major outage' that
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
For myself, I usually pick the first three in us.pool.ntp.org, tick and tock,
time.nist.gov, and a couple of regionally appropriate large universities.
As this week indicated, perhaps tick and tock are not sufficiently
As a reminder - time infrastructure is not recommended for
virtualization. Make them physicals.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what happens when you just follow vendor recommendations blindly. If
you do follow that on vm's (which can actually be a
The utility of this is somewhat moderated by limited geographical
mobility while a phone's active in a single session. One rarely
drives from San Francisco to LA typing all the way on their smartphone
data connection, for example.
To the extent that you may apply IP ranges to wider geographical
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Nov 26, 2012, at 14:51 , George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
The utility of this is somewhat moderated by limited geographical
mobility while a phone's active in a single session. One rarely
drives from San
The press is reporting on Renesys' report that Syria has finally dropped all
its internet connectivity earlier this morning:
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2012/11/syria-off-the-air.shtml
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Tom Beecher tbeec...@localnet.com wrote:
Assuming it's true, it was bound to happen. Running anything , TOR or
otherwise, that allows strangers to do whatever they want is just folly.
Such as, say, an Internet Service Provider business?
...
--
-george
in the US the ISP doesn't get
dinged, except in certain cases where they are legally required to remove
access to material and don't.
End users have no such protections that I'm aware of that cover them
similarly.
On 11/29/2012 2:50 PM, George Herbert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:18 AM
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Naslund, Steve snasl...@medline.com wrote:
ISPs also do not allow strangers to do whatever they want ISPs have
responsibilities to act on DCMA notices and CALEA requests from law
enforcement. These are things that Tor exit nodes are not capable of
doing. If
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Naslund, Steve snasl...@medline.com wrote:
The entire point of Tor is to be untraceable back to the source. Egress
filters can prevent future abuse but do not provide for tracing back to
the original source of offending conduct. They are not trying to stop
-Original Message-
From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 2:06 PM
To: Tom Beecher
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help
if you can.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Tom Beecher tbeec
Those who do not remember history...
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:23 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Naslund, Steve wrote:
My message to the cops and my lawyer would be charge me or lets clear
this up. There are laws to protect you from the government from taking
your stuff
On Dec 1, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
It amazes me how people feel free to opine on things...
Actually, what really bugs/amazes me about that thread is that the
person whom this
250 or so km east of Sendai, near the big offshore quake zone from last year.
CNN and the USGS have the basic info but no tsunami warning or damage info yet
as fas as I saw.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:36 AM, JP Viljoen froztb...@froztbyte.net wrote:
On
Having (once) tapped thicknet, done a lot of thinnet termination and
cable cut debugging, and then used hubs and switches in 10BT and
onwards...
Having had one main standard (RJ45) has been a huge benefit to
advancing the state of networking to where we are today. But it is
probably worth
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
...
But is there a decently scalable open source application for building
a CMDB, that is visually appealing and efficient for humans to use,
without a ton of manual development; other than custom building
applications
On Dec 20, 2012, at 10:01 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/20/12, Charles N Wyble charles-li...@knownelement.com wrote:
Zenoss works very well as a cmdb.
Zenoss is very visually appealing, but a monitoring system for network
hosts, not a CMDB.
In particular, except
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote:
On 12/17/2012 9:22 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
If the facility is big enough the utility of twisted pair becomes quite
limited, both due to distance and differing electrical potential,
multibuilding campuses in particular
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Dec 21, 2012, at 10:54 , George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote:
On 12/17/2012 9:22 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
If the facility is big enough
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:36 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
Communications using a key signed by a trusted
third party suffer such attacks only with extraordinary difficulty on
the part of the attacker. It's purely a technical matter.
While I agree with your general characterization
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:27 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:10 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:36 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
Communications using a key signed by a trusted
third party suffer
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:31 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:10:55 -0800, George Herbert said:
Google is setting a higher bar here, which may be sufficient to deter
a lot of bots and script kiddies for the next few years, but it's not
enough against nation-state
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:27 AM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
There'd have to be some organization to negotiate and oversee
international settlements and other, similar, regulations.
Why? The internet has operated just fine without such for quite some time
now.
The Internet is held
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Erik Levinson
erik.levin...@uberflip.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm having an unusual DNS problem and would appreciate feedback.
For the zones in question, primary DNS is provided by GoDaddy and
secondary DNS by DNS Made Easy. Over a week ago we made changes to
On Jan 18, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:41:41AM +0100, . wrote:
On 17 January 2013 23:38, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
..
By the way, if anyone *does* know of a good and reliable way to prevent CSRF
without the need for
On Jan 20, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:54:37PM -0800, George Herbert wrote:
On Jan 18, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
Storing any state server-side is a really bad idea for scalability and
reliability
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:20:07PM +0100, . wrote:
CAPTCHAS are a defense in depth that reduce the number of spam
incidents to a number manageable by humans.
No, they do not. If you had actually bothered to read the links
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Last I heard, roof rights are pricey down there :)
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
Satellite! ;)
...And somewhat silly, given that it's *that* facility.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
In a message written on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 07:46:06PM -0800, Owen DeLong
wrote:
Case 2, you move the CO Full problem from the CO to the adjacent
cable vaults. Even with fiber, a 10,000 strand bundle is not small.
It's
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
OK... Like Einstein, math is not my strong suit.
Unfortunately, I don't have his prowess with physics, either.
Owen
A bit here, a bit there... Hey, dB is a plural of Bits!
--
-george william herbert
Ok, serious question -
How is GPON's downstream AES encryption keying handled?
--
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com
Normal apps can usually get the accelerometer data without breaking device
security.
So you download the newest cool free Mine Birds or whatnot, and its server
upload traffic eventually includes guesses at your passcode along with your
game status...
George William Herbert
Sent from my
All in favor of phonescoop being blacklisted from nanog? Anyone?
Anyone? Buehler?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com wrote:
haha i love the header:
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
All,
I have been searching our beloved internet endlessly for months on
information regarding Visio technique. Does anyone have a good resource(s)
for advanced visio drawings, or more to the point
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:58 PM, George Herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
My company has a Visio whiz, who I'm going to ping for his opinion on
that, but I am guessing it's a no.
Our Visio guy's opinion concurred with mine; it's custom drawing, not
off-the-shelf capability
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-03-04 13:23 -0500), Jeff Wheeler wrote:
We have lots of stupid people in our industry because so few
understand The Way Things Work.
We have tendency to view mistakes we do as unavoidable human errors and
mistakes other
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
So, your position, which is substantiated my Microsoft's / Windows
Phone's / Skype's lack of IPv6 support , is that nobody cares until
we run out of IPv4.
That is clearly reducto ad absurdum and does not resemble
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Matthew wrote:
[...]
1. Decreased application complexity:
Yeah. After IPv4 goes entirely away. Which is a long, long, LONG time from
now. Until then…
I don't think so. I think IPv4's demise as a supported internet
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:30 PM, david raistrick dr...@icantclick.org wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, George Herbert wrote:
The mindshare shift is happening, but the change won't snowball until
IT admins - in bulk - really get it.
and keeping in mind that the bulk still don't get ipv4, either
It is (or was) fairly commonly in use among internal nets which
overflowed RFC 1918 or have to internetwork with other heavy users of
RFC 1918 space. I know of at least two service providers and one cell
network who were using it for that 3 years ago.
Someone leaking internal routes for such?
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, cb.list6 cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I am pretty sure Class E is completely defunct and not used anywhere
since Cisco and Juniper routers do not forward the packets (circa 2008
testing) and no known host accept it as a valid address, AFAIK.
Both the net and host
On Mar 23, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Kyle Creyts kyle.cre...@gmail.com wrote:
Will they really demand ubiquitous, unabridged connectivity?
Let's back up. End users do not as a rule* have persistent inbound
connections. If they have DSL and a Cable Modem they can switch manually (or
with a
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23309-information-superhighway-approaches-light-speed.html
Information superhighway approaches light speed
18:00 24 March 2013 by Jacob Aron Nothing moves faster than light in a
vacuum,
Packets, shmackets. I'm just upset that my BGP over Semaphore Towers
routing protocol extension hasn't been experimentally validated yet.
Whoever you are who keeps flying pigeons between my test towers, you can't
deliver packets without proper routing updates! Knock it off long enough
for me to
In europe? He probably was thinking of a Volvo 245...
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Jamie Bowden ja...@photon.com wrote:
From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
- Original Message -
From: TJ trej...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
Seconded Graybar. If necessary, in the absence of Graybar or for tiny
stuff, a Frys or Home Depot or Lowes.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
Graybar.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Warren Bailey
Widely discussed on outa...@outages.org list (hint!) but for those not yet list
members over there, 13 or more states in southeast US affected, reportedly
routing / layer 3 issue, possibly BGP to outside but not clear. Some service
restorations discussed.
George William Herbert
Sent from my
Everyone I know has either paid through the nose or written one from
scratch. No good open source projects that worked out.
Most people couldn't build well from scratch. I have been a couple of
places that did, it was man-year of senior grade guy effort range.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:01 PM,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jan 31, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 7b85f9d8-ba9e-4341-9242-5eb514895...@virtualized.org, David
Conrad
writes:
I hope none of you ever get hijacked by a spammer housed at Phoenix =
NAP. :)
In
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:17 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
Almost everyone are basically just selling an activation with one of the
SSL certificate authorities.
I usually buy a RapidSSL (Verisign) certificate from
https://www.sslmatrix.com/ -- they seem to have some of the best
prices
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:49 PM, George Herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:17 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
The problem with anything related to Verisign at the moment
Brothers' are fine; buy the tapes that have the split-down-the-middle
backing on them.
It reduces the unpeeling problem from
more-time-than-the-label-took-to-type-in to about 2 seconds. You just
grab the edges at an end and bend it, so the backing bulges outwards,
and off it starts to come.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 16/02/2012 21:14, George Herbert wrote:
Brothers' are fine; buy the tapes that have the split-down-the-middle
backing on them.
It reduces the unpeeling problem from
more-time-than-the-label-took-to-type-in to about 2
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Jason Chambers jchamb...@ucla.edu wrote:
On 2/16/12 5:03 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/
Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Aled Morris al...@qix.co.uk
On 17 February 2012 18:43, Eric Tykwinski eric-l...@truenet.com
wrote:
+1 for GBICs, SFPs
You'll need to be carrying a lot of loose change then :-)
In
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:44 PM, George Carey geo...@montco.net wrote:
The vending machine should use a card like an ATM/gift card, not accept
cash. You should be able to charge the card with some cash via a web
portal and keep the card in the facility in your space. If something is
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, George Herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:44 PM, George Carey geo...@montco.net wrote:
The vending machine should use a card like an ATM/gift card, not accept
cash. You should be able to charge the card with some cash via a web
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:28 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net wrote:
On Feb 26, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
1. Full redundancy with instant failover to other hypervisor hosts
upon hardware failure (I
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:45 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:19 PM, George Herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
Failing to have central shared storage (iSCSI, NAS, SAN, whatever you
prefer) fails the smell test on a local enterprise-grade
virtualization
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:59 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
Yes, well, that's why we're still using a layer 4 protocol (TCP) that
can't dynamically rebind to the protocol level below (IP).
This is somewhat irritating, but on the scale of 0 (all is well) to 10
(you want me to do
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Jason Bertoch ja...@i6ix.com wrote:
On 2/27/2012 7:53 PM, William Herrin wrote:
I think you're more likely to find a network engineer with (possibly
limited)
programming skills.
I wish. For the past three months I've been trying to find a network
engineer
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Monday, February 27, 2012 07:53:07 PM William Herrin wrote:
.../SCI clearance.
The clearance is killing me. The two generalists didn't have a
clearance and the cleared applicants are programmers or admins but
never both.
Out of curiosity -
Is it possible it's a command and control network, rather than
directly an attack?
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Chris Stone axi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote:
Anyone else see a massive increase of scanning/dos with
Isabel -
It does not take a PhD in computer science to understand networks or
network protocol design. It does not take a PhD to understand that
the troll's particular proposal was not a competent well-founded
contribution.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:25 AM, isabel dias isabeldi...@yahoo.com
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
