RE: FTTH ONTs and routers

I have used a lot of Calix gear. It works good until they decide to EoL your platform. They grow through acquisition, then see which products they want to keep. Adtran seems to have the same features and the same pricepoint. The Calix E7 is a relatively new product...plenty of bugs compared to

Rack Locks

with cameras those janky make nobody happy. If someone knows a better place to ask this that would be nice too. Thanks for your time! Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom - City of Burlington 200 Church St, Burlington, VT 05401

RE: CALEA Requirements

competition then you may never get one of these. The full data captures are rare. Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom - City of Burlington 200 Church St, Burlington, VT 05401 -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Lorell Hathcock Sent: Monday, March 14

RE: Broadcast television in an IP world

>Does multicast have any future? Nope. We have a couple of gigs of multicast traffic on our network. Its pretty easy. You can't pay me enough to troubleshoot multicast between different ISP's. Multicast network look different from the Internet. One would have to change. On top of that

Brocade SLX Internet Edge

core. Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom - City of Burlington 200 Church St, Burlington, VT 05401

RE: Brocade SLX Internet Edge

extreme-2Dnetworks-2Dblog_internet-2Drouting-2Din-2Dthe-2Denterprise_=DwMGaQ=H-_4ND6xHpqgzcyjh8aroNpgOyofdYsHrgIgJ94I47w=8KBJJnyFAhW7tSYonou-hrzJp0AgKIxIroKtTA850eU=KQ3bFBpmJxMvk6-gUGIquclVowK5s1yqe6K3DhY5MZw=3rfpGQzZ3dJx3KZvPnF21DuFdz569Krg0zdmo1W_Cfg=>" Kevin Burke 802-540-0979

RE: Poor mans TAP

Netscout has some EoL ones that are on the cheap these days. These are cheap enough to forget at a customer’s site. https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?&_nkw=Netscout+280-0160 Netscout 280-0160 And yes a SPAN port on a switch is where I start sniffing. Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Tel

RE: FCC proposes $10 Million fine for spoofed robocalls

SPAM isn't fixed but its not being abused. Technical fixes might will no doubt be part of the problem. But enforcement will also address this. But yes I see everyone's lack of apathy for this problem as only accelerating the death of the PSTN. Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom 200

Re: Integrated WIFI router and phone adapter

. Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom 200 Church St, Burlington, VT On 5/18/20, 9:46 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Bryan Holloway" wrote: WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clic

RE: Securing Greenfield Service Provider Clients

me as something that is better suited for spotting exfiltration. Searching for known clear text similar to “FBI Classified” or a watermark in documents sounded like an attainable goal from SSL decryption. Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom 200 Church St, Burlington, VT From: NANOG

Re: Layer 3 Switches

so I suggest assessing a switch on their own merits, regardless of bad experiences with that vendor in the router realm. Rubens Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom 200 Church St, Burlington, VT

Re: CGNAT

is correct, just not for everyone. The whole "one size fits some" kind of solution. Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom 200 Church St, Burlington, VT On 3/1/21, 2:38 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Jared Brown" wrote: WARNING!! This message originated from an Externa

Re: CGNAT

ease IPv4 to tide us over. I would be curious to see what other’s estimate the costs of various approaches. Feel free to ping me off-list for more specific numbers. Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom 200 Church St, Burlington, VT From: NANOG on behalf of Steve Saner Date: Friday, Febr

RE: Amazon peering revisited

will do what I need to balance my bits. The fancy algorithms they use to balance traffic around does allow them to operate a decent network with fewer staff and less links to the small ISPs. Just a network operator here, trying to get my bytes across the wire. Enjoy your weekend! Kevin

RE: Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams)

common BGP traffic engineering tool of AS Padding your left with next worst option. Best of luck! Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom 200 Church St, Burlington, VT From: NANOG On Behalf Of Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 2:28 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject

RE: Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing?

nightly peak. Or to put it another way, this is how the sausage is made. P.S. Both of us top posting is also bad form. Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom 200 Church St, Burlington, VT From: NANOG On Behalf Of Douglas Fischer Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 8:51 AM To: Pirawat

RE: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements

You may want to set this up yourself anyways. In the effort of making things work, your upstream ISP may have had to setup these records on your behalf. If not now, they may in the future. Having duplicate entries can cause unexpected results. Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom 200

RE: TACACS+ server recommendations?

that can use AD as the backend. Also curious if others have tried this and noticed any obvious downsides. Thanks! Kevin Burke 802-540-0979 Burlington Telecom 200 Church St, Burlington, VT