Re: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?

On 30 Nov 2011, at 21:10, Ray Soucy wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: I do believe that there is no benefit to longer prefixes than /64. Nobody has provided any convincing evidence to the contrary. There are better ways to mitigate ND than longer

Re: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?

On 30 Nov 2011, at 23:02, Bill Stewart wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Mark Blackman m...@exonetric.com wrote: ... and I'm not sure why SLAAC wanted more than 48 bits. One reason IPv6 addresses are 128 bits long instead of 40, 48, 64 or 80 is because converting from IPv4 to IPv6

Re: Sad IPv4 story?

On 9 Dec 2011, at 20:47, Benson Schliesser wrote: On Dec 9, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Fred Baker wrote: On Dec 9, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Franck Martin wrote: I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their

Re: Sad IPv4 story?

On 9 Dec 2011, at 21:05, Benson Schliesser bens...@queuefull.net wrote: On Dec 9, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Mark Blackman wrote: On Dec 9, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Fred Baker wrote: We're going to be hearing a lot more of these. It's the nature of finite resources, and of human nature when faced

Re: IPv6 Ignorance

On 17 Sep 2012, at 15:55, Adrian Bool a...@logic.org.uk wrote: Hi, On 17 Sep 2012, at 15:02, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: On 17/09/2012 14:37, Adrian Bool wrote: It seems a tad unfair that the bottom 80 bits are squandered away with a utilisation rate of something closely

Re: London UK smart hands recommendations?

On 15 Jul 2011, at 16:24, ryanL wrote: i have a bunch of fully-loaded network gear (nexus 7k's, asr 9k's, etc) that needs to be pulled out of racks, moved across a data centre floor, and re-racked. looking for success stories and recommendations for licensed, bonded, insured companies in

Re: looking for good AU dedicated server providers..

On 29 Jan 2014, at 23:37, Carlos Kamtha kam...@ak-labs.net wrote: Hello, Was wondering if anyone could share any experiences. Prerequsites: a.) reliable upstream provider with established peering. b.) relatively acessible support staff. c.) FreeBSD preferring but

Re: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

> On 4 Sep 2015, at 22:18, Fred Hollis wrote: > > Hi, > > Anyone also experiencing really high lancy and packetloss 80%+ in nyc/nj area > for cogent/level3/zayo? From London, yes to a general problem, but not sure if it’s specific to NYC, just East Coast in general.

Re: Domain renawals

> On 21 Sep 2016, at 19:43, james machado wrote: > > so who would you quantify as secure and reliable? who does not require > additional "services" besides registration or spend all their time trying > to upsell you? > > james I have always liked https://www.gandi.net/

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

> On 16 Dec 2016, at 21:35, Rob McEwen wrote: > But global warming and CO2 being a cause of it. http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ What sort of effects do you reckon a 35% increase in atmospheric CO2 over historical levels over the

Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption

> On 4 Dec 2017, at 19:19, Adam Lawson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking for suggestions on 1U-2U sized router with 1G interface > which can handle both IPv4 and IPv6 full BGP table and doesn't consume > too much power. > > > > The router needs to be squeezed in to

Re: VPS providers contacts

> On 11 Feb 2019, at 18:18, Jordan Michaels wrote: > > Virtkick was acquired by OnApp > (https://www.virtkick.com/blog/onapp-to-acquire-virtkick.html), so you might > be able to contact OnApp about it. "Ultimately, the acquisition was not consummated, and Virtkick remained an independent