Hello maillist anyone had any experience with segment routing and its
performance over LDP? We are evaluating the option to move to SR over LDP
so we can label switch across our Nexus L3 switching environment.
Thanks
Packet Plumber
Dip
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:11 AM, Matt Geary <matt.ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello maillist anyone had any experience with segment routing and its
> performance over LDP? We are evaluating the option to move to SR over LDP
> so we can label switch across our Nexus L3 switching e
?
So break the ease of LDP just to get label switching on my hub core not
really seeing it, unless someone has done it and they are seeing the value.
On Tue, May 22, 2018, 10:14 Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>
> On 22/May/18 10:06, Matt Geary wrote:
>
> Yes we are
>
> On 18/May/18 12:11, Matt Geary wrote:
>
> Hello maillist anyone had any experience with segment routing and its
> performance over LDP? We are evaluating the option to move to SR over LDP
> so we can label switch across our Nexus L3 switching environment.
>
>
> Is
Hi Saku gotcha and I see most config examples are RSVP/SR-TE like, where in
most of the networks I have come across basic LDP is more than acceptable.
On Tue, May 22, 2018, 17:48 Saku Ytti wrote:
> Hey Matt,
>
> > I guess my point is why go through the extra config to program
I guess my point is why go through the extra config to program labels for
each box when LDP does it for you? Why loose potential visibility to
network traffic? Cisco sales and marketing is digging huge into the SR game
for enterprise and SDWAN like backbone networking. They are touting about
the
6 matches
Mail list logo