Question on peering strategies

outes are taken? Can the networks do load balancing on the two connection and essentially use them as primary routes? Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science University of Oregon

Re: Question on peering strategies

COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and > its attachments from all computers. > > -Original Message

Re: Question on peering strategies

a shared switching fabric. Is this just because that shared fabric has geographical reach, as in the case of IXReach? I also see that links provided in this discussion show Europe based networks that are using this peering type more often. Is this widely accepted that US market is totally different f

What can I infer from "show ip route" and similar BGP commands?

AS-path translation: { OREGONUNIV UONET } car1.Sacramento1 (metric 34363) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal Community: North_America Lclprf_100 Level3_Customer United_States Sacramento Originator: car1.Sacramento1 Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research F

Re: What can I infer from "show ip route" and similar BGP commands?

Thanks Joel for your detailed explanation. It was very informative. I have been using routeviews for sometime, but given that I could get this amount of information from other sources, I decided to give this a try. On another note, do you think there is any value in checking the next hop IP? I hav

interconnection costs

is no single answer as different businesses may have different pricing models. I hope the discussion can help me understand the whole ecosystem a little bit better. Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science University of Oregon

Re: interconnection costs

;settlement free" peering. Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science University of Oregon On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:33 AM, James Bensley wrote: > On 22 December 2015 at 16:44, Reza Motamedi > wrote: >

Re: interconnection costs

ee. All the costs of HW, SW, personnel, administration, and perhaps transmission between colos (including remote peering, being waved to another location, tethering) would be the same, right? Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Informatio

Re: interconnection costs

still a normal practice. Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science University of Oregon On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > > > On 23 December 2015 at 20:05, Reza Motamedi > wrote

Inferring the location points of traffic exchange between two networks

uld be a flag to differentiate records showing iBGP vs eBGP. On the same note, if we issue the commands on a router other than the border router in San Fran, is there any difference in the output of show commands? Now how are things different if we actually run the commands on that gateway ro

Re: Inferring the location points of traffic exchange between two networks

13 ESTAB 317d 9h 1m0 0 569704 0 192.65.184.24 513 ESTAB 54d16h26m 0 0 569704 0 tells me that 513 is peering with 20965 that city, right? Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group C

Figuring out traceroute

ferent ports of one router? I think the other explanation is that there is switch (or something that does not have IP footprint) between `From` side and `To` side. How probable do you think this second explanation is? Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M)

distinguishing eBGP from show ip BGP

156.2.1602 0 2828 209 i * 65.106.7.56 3 0 2828 209 i * 216.156.2.1652 0 2828 209 i * 65.106.7.144 2 0 2828 209 i Best Regards Reza Motamedi (

Re: distinguishing eBGP from show ip BGP

ect at the location of the router, or if packets need to stay for some hops in the local AS. On Wed, Mar 11, 2015, 2:51 PM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 11/Mar/15 20:32, Reza Motamedi wrote: > > Hi Nanog, > > > > For a research I want to distinguish the external AS peering from

Re: distinguishing eBGP from show ip BGP

.106.7.246 3 0 2828 209 i * 65.106.7.55 3 0 2828 209 i *> 216.156.2.1622 0 2828 209 i Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer an

Re: distinguishing eBGP from show ip BGP

dd and uncommon case, but can it help? Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science University of Oregon On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 11/Mar/15 21:42, Reza Motamedi wrote: >