You probably need a trust anchor as well.
See http://ftp.isc.org/isc/pubs/tn/isc-tn-2006-1.html.
Rubens
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:14 PM, itservices88 itservice...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was building a test domain for trying out the dnssec. However as mentioned
on various websites ad appears
You need to put a filter on your interfaces that references a filter later on
to not session track a flow. I think you need to be running Junos-jsr[0]
10.0 or 10.1 to use this :
The same goes for 9.x, just be sure to except traffic to the router
(like BGP session) from the packet-mode, they
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* Randy Bush:
your perfectly fine multihop BGP session could break when rerouting
occurs.
one of the many reasons that there are no perfectly fine multi-hop bgp
sessions.
Uhm, is there a way around them when
This usually indicates a heavily malware-contaminated userbase or
1-to-N NAT/PAT with a large N. Having both is what usually triggers
this, but sometimes if you are strong on one, it could be enough.
Rubens
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Magill
tmag...@providecommerce.com wrote:
Is
I'm ok with whatever system they provide if the functionality stays
the same. I don't understand what they gain by making a human login
and download the file.
Accountability. If versions X and Y of database got abused (breach of
ToS), and only user U has downloaded such versions, gotcha.
The future of WiMAX seems a lot less promising now that FD-LTE is the
clear winner for wide-scale mobile deployment, and TD-LTE, 802.11n and
proprietary technologies will compete for non-paired spectrum and/or
niche markets.
But one can build a network with WiMAX and make money out of it;
global
If your routing platform doesn't have POS OC-3, you can use a
converter to map Ethernet services to it and keep using the platform
you've been using. You lose a little on efficiency and failure
detection, but turning BFD on might help:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Routing/BFD
I've worked
Between e-discovery and RIAA issues, retention times are probably shrinking
even though capacity for retention is growing.
Capacity for retention has grown but one still needs fast searching of
data, or a few LEA requests on the same day or week will overflow your
capacity to answer them.
The fact hat Verisign kept the domain business and sold the CA
business to Symantec tells which business they think is stronger.
Rubens
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:00 PM, ML m...@kenweb.org wrote:
Would a future with a ubiquitous DNSSEC deployment eliminate the market
for commercial CAs?
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:54 PM, ym1r...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know open source solutions doesn't have support for fabric or
high speed asics. So the throughput will always be a big difference. Unless
you are comparing a pure packet software interrupt platform.
Not high speed ASICs,
One can start with
http://antispam.br/videos/english/
Rubens
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Alex Thurlow a...@blastro.com wrote:
I'm trying to find out if there are currently any resources available for
teaching people how to be safe online. As in, how to not get a virus, how
to pick
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Matt Disuko gourmetci...@hotmail.com wrote:
It seems the subdomain shop.starwars.com is being redirected.
Anybody else seeing this?
The Rebel Alliance managed to hit that site, but the Empire struck
back and it's back online again.
Rubens
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Backdoor Santa
backdoorsan...@hotmail.com wrote:
Ever wonder what Comcast's connections to the Internet look like? In the
tradition of WikiLeaks, someone stumbled upon these graphs of their TATA
links. For reference, TATA is the only other IP transit provider
There is not a single RIR that is not physically located in a country.
You can hope they are more stable from a policy point of view, but, the
reality is that if someone shows up at the front door with tanks and
mortars, my money is not on the RIR.
But they might choose a country in that
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Geoff Huston g...@apnic.net wrote:
On 01/02/2011, at 7:02 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
with the iana free pool run-out, i guess we won't be getting those nice
graphs any more. might we have one last one for the turnstiles? :-)/2
and would you mind doing the curves
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com wrote:
1. Does anyone know where the Bovespa is located and if colocation is a
possibility at that datacenter/s.
Sao Paulo downtown, although it is unclear at this time if it will
stay there or not. They do not provide
CTBC has capacity from GBLX, TIWS and SEABONE, although not all
prefixes are announced to all providers. TIWS usual path in the US is
thru Level 3, so steering the traffic to Level 3 might do the trick.
Rubens
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Steve Danelli the76po...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Ronald Bonica rbon...@juniper.net wrote:
Folks,
Somehow, it is appropriate that this should happen on February 3. On February
3, 1959, Buddy Holly, Richie Valens and JP Richardson (aka The Big Bopper)
died in a plane crash. Don McLean immortalized that day as
I'm noticing an increase in getting query rate exceeded at whois
services that might be connected to a symptom described by ARIN at
NANOG 48/ARIN XXV and ARIN XXVI where machines ask for the whois
record of their own IP address.
Are there any clues of what is causing this ?
Rubens
I'm noticing an increase in getting query rate exceeded at whois
services that might be connected to a symptom described by ARIN at
NANOG 48/ARIN XXV and ARIN XXVI where machines ask for the whois
record of their own IP address.
Are there any clues of what is causing this ?
Some spam bots
Requirements are basically just 24/48 SFP ports, PVLAN and selective QinQ.
Most devices that fit the requirements are Layer 3, which pushes the cost
per port too high.
Cisco ME6524 has a model with 32 SFP ports (24 with 3:1
oversubscription, 8 non-oversubscribed) and IP Base IOS which has
very
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:58 PM, David Hubbard
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Hi all, anyone have suggestions for very stable/reliable managed DNS?
Neustar/UltraDNS is an obvious option to look at, just curious about
alternatives. Cost effective would be nice, but stable under attack is
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net wrote:
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
Not tested under attack, but this DNS provider is worth a look since
it's the only one with both IPv6 and DNSSEC a colleague could find:
http
We use Cisco 6524s with packets up to 1546 bytes with no issues. IOS
ZU2, but we are testing SXI1 with no MTU issues so far.
Rubens
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Warren Bailey wbai...@gci.com wrote:
Has anyone encountered a 6524 dropping packets larger than 1492? IOS
12.2(33)SXH2a
Manage Engine flow receiver with no user sessions viewing statistics
runs at 100% CPU for 200+ Mbps unsampled traffic. It's suited to SMBs
only.
Rubens
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Michael J McCafferty
m...@m5computersecurity.com wrote:
ManageEngine's product is the one that kills browsers
You're correct, out of the box there aren't many. The first couple that
come to mind are the Apple Airport Express and Airport Extreme, but I don't
believe Linksys/Netgear/etc. have support out of the box.
The Apple products do 6to4 out of the box, but don't support v6 natively.
Apple
I challenge the usual suspects to deliver actual working dual stack IPv6 ADSL
CPE rather than feigning interest. None of the major CPE vendors appear to
have a v6 plan despite your claims. We have an IPv6 dual stack trial for
ADSL going on and not a single CPE from the _major consumer
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:48 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:20:25 EDT, William Allen Simpson said:
It's not legal for an ISP to modify computer data. Especially
digitally signed data. That's a criminal offense.
Citation?
Could tampering with DNSSEC and/or TLS
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:29 PM, David E. Smith d...@mvn.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 17:08, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
That is, HTTPs should become assumed.
As much as that would be wonderful from a security standpoint, IMO
it's not realistic to expect every mom-and-pop
For the common good it doesn't matter if the NAT is good guys are
right or the NAT is useless guys are right, as they both fail to
decrease the numbers of their opposing parts. We must get IPv6 done
for both of them.
It seems that application reverse-proxies can make NAT is good guys
happy, so
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Fredy Kuenzler kuenz...@init7.net wrote:
I'm trying to compile a comprehensive and up-to-date list of Minimum
Allocation Sizes by the various RIRs. Any hint would be appreciated. I have
so far:
NIRs (National Internet Registries) in the APNIC and LACNIC area
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Brandon Ewing nicot...@warningg.com wrote:
Greetings,
Can someone put me in contact with someone with clue in the Telefonica
backbone? One of their downstreams is hijacking a prefix of mine as a /24.
I've also started advertising the /24 to my upstreams, but
Fyi, I just was rejected from arin for an ipv4 allocation. I demonstrated I
own ~100k ipv4 addresses today.
My customers use over 10 million bogon / squat space ip addresses today,
and I have good attested data on that.
But all I can qualify for is a /18, and then in 3 months maybe a /17.
May be the attack on Facebook put Akamai into DEFCON 1 ?
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/anonymous_claims_responsibility_for_facebook_outag.php
Rubens
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Magill
tmag...@providecommerce.com wrote:
This morning we began having issues at one of our
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Jeff Wheeler j...@inconcepts.biz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.li...@gmail.com wrote:
So what part of VRSN got broken into? They do a lot more than just DNS.
Indeed, VeriSign owns Illuminet, who are mission-critical for
With IPv6 growing, if we were to design a native IPv6 router, with
IPv4 functionality thrown in, then is it possible to design a more
optimal IPv6 router, than what exists today?
OK, I'll bite. What would qualify as a native IPv6 router? Is this
another concept as silly as hardware vs
I can tell you with 100% certainty that when I was responsible for
handling ccTLD delegation changes that we took the issue of ccTLDs being
operated for the benefit of the Internet community in that country, and
the global Internet community as a whole, very seriously. I have no
reason to
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
Claim: 1.4 GBit/s over up to 13 km, 24 GHZ, @3 kUSD/link price point.
http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber
Claims are actually Up to 1.4 Gbps and Up to 13 km; those two
conditions probably cannot be satisfied together.
1.4 Gbps is
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
I manage a tiny network in the Amazon, a satellite internet connection and
decent sized wireless network.
Is DNS traffic being directed to bogus servers? Are the real servers being
overloaded? Am I seeing the results of
In case you feel a BGP announcement should not be RPKI Invalid but
something else, you do what's described on slide 15-17:
https://ripe64.ripe.net/presentations/77-RIPE64-Plenery-RPKI.pdf
The same currently happens with DNSSEC, doing what Comcast calls
negative trust anchors:
I am looking for any guidance and advice people have regarding first
time peerings in South America. Currently I am doing some work with a
content provider in North America and I want to get them better
routers into South America, to South American ISPs. I am looking to
get them an
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
Subject: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD
I see that LWN has already spotted this; smb will no doubt be pleased to
know that the very first reply suggests
No large flows reported to the affected NSes, tweets were suspicious at best,
other anon-ops denied the attack was them, and GoDaddy admitted internal
error.
I'm going to take GoDaddy at their word, and give them major kudos for owning
up to the mistake - in public.
That doesn't mean
Besides the other solutions listed, you can also take a look at Arbor
(formerly Ellacoya) and Sandvine.
Rubens
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Bruce Grobler br...@yoafrica.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know of any Shaping appliances to shape customers based on IP,
allow for a quota per IP
Covad telling you they don't keep logs is different from them not
really having the logs... but, if they really don't keep logs, they
are posing a risk that FBI or DHS might not be happy with. The feds
will probably be more persuasive than you, so maybe hinting them about
this situation may change
On shared media like radio access, every unwanted packet means less
performance you will get out of the network. This can be done by NAT,
stateful filtering with public IPs or stateless filtering with public
IPs; the advantage of doing NAT is making it easier for the end-point
software to know
Could be a local trojan inserting bogus entries on the hosts file,
could be DNS poisoning on one particular resolver, or an infection on
the distribution source.
Rubens
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Mari Nichols m...@imarsolutions.com wrote:
I believe the file is originating directly from
As IP traffic is assumed to be self-similar, my EE origins tell me to
look for parameters that could measure it from stochastic process
theory. On a Google search this paper sounded interesting:
http://www.sparc.uni-mb.si/OPNET/PDF/IWSSIP2007Fras.pdf
(...) We estimated
the Hurst parameter (H) for
During the days of the IPng directorate, quite a number of different
alternatives were considered. At one point, there was a compromise proposal
known as the Big 10 design, because it was propounded at the Big Ten
Conference Center near O'Hare. One feature of it was addresses of length
Hi.
Are there solutions already available implementing 40GBASE-LR4,
100GBASE-LR4 and 100GBASE-ER4 draft standards ? By solutions it means
both switches with CFP-MSA/QSFP/CXP ports and the modules.
Rubens
Is your burstable bandwidth cost high enough to pay 100K for a gear
just to meet the commitments ? NAGIOS/CACTI monitoring alerts sent to
someone (which may be hired help from any place in the world) would
probably beat that in cost effectiveness.
The performance requirement is where a line is
We have noticed that a number of Cisco appliances we have recently purchased
and paid (AS NEW), are being shipped as if they have been already
used/refurbished. In other words, several times we have seen brand new Cisco
hardware, out of the box, that has pre-existing configuration
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Brian Feeny bfe...@mac.com wrote:
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
- Stream every motion picture ever created in less than
Arista EOS - what good/bad things do you have to say about their
management capabilities? which known brand can it be compared to?
I couldn't help myself thinking that the name of an operanting system
shouldn't resemble End of Sales that much.
Rubens
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Paul Stewart pstew...@nexicomgroup.net wrote:
Yeah, just learning that... got a *tonne* of offline replies.
Planets won't work well, simpson characters we'll run out very
quickly umm.. forgot the rest. We were looking for something that
makes sense to the
Although also being a small SOHO switch, may be Netgear GS-108T can
suit your needs.
I want remove the initial staging step by allowing the installer to just
plug the switch in and have the switch grab a config from a TFTP server
noted by a DHCP option.
Not quite, it can download config from
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Michael Sokolov
msoko...@ivan.harhan.org wrote:
Tore Anderson tore.ander...@redpill-linpro.com wrote:
Juniper. If you want to run OSPFv3 on their layer 3 switches, you need
a quite expensive advanced licence. OSPFv2, on the other hand, is
included in the base
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Holmes,David A dhol...@mwdh2o.com wrote:
We use Cisco 3750 L3 switches for Metro Ethernet connectivity. The 3750
SFPs can run at wire speed up to 1 GiGE. The 3750s are very reliable,
and have good, follow-the-sun technical support in case of problems.
Some
That is extremely curious. How can they justify taking 4 million addresses
for research two days before running out of regularly allocatable address
space? They could have taken that /10 out of the final /8 rather than taking
it from the last scraps of regular space if they really need a
perhaps, if you are seeking support for commercial activity, you should
make your employment more clear and declare any conflicts of interest.
Fair enough.
I am employed by Cisco Systems, but all of my statements are my own and I do
not represent my employer. I believe that my employer
You can try the SCW IRR [1].
It's free, but is in Portuguese.
Reference:
[1] http://whois.scw.net.br/
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Sounds like that doesn't help the OP, who wanted help with RPSL, not
*really* help from AltDB.
Actually it does, because of a wizard (http://irr.scw.net.br/new) to
Isn't the real problem with global multicast: How do we ultimately
bill the broadcaster for all that traffic amplification that happened
*inside* every other AS? It seems like you'd have to do per-packet
accounting at every router, and coordinate billing/reporting amongst
all providers that
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com
Isn't the real problem with global multicast: How do we ultimately
bill the broadcaster for all that traffic amplification that
happened
*inside* every
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Mark Farina markfarin...@gmail.com wrote:
As of April 27th I have started to receive dhcp broadcast requests
originating from the 7.0.0.0/8 network. Based on MAC addresses, it
seems that this is communication between the Rogers border/node
hardware (MAC
Is the DoD releasing this range to Rogers? Or has Rogers squatted on
this space due to exhaustion of their 10/8 use? We've seen other
Squatting resources from an organization that can deploy F/A-18
Hornets, F/A-22 Raptors, Predator drones or Navy SEALs is probably bad
to your health.
It's
ms made by the product descriptions seem suspect to me.
it claims to be Carrier-agnostic and ISP-neutral, yet When an event is
detected, Verisign will work with the customer to redirect Internet traffic
destined for the protected service to a Verisign Internet Defense Network
site.
anyone
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Tom Ammon tom.am...@utah.edu wrote:
Hi All,
We're pushing to get IPv6 deployed and working everywhere in our operation,
and I had some questions about best practices for a few things.
On your management nets (network device management nets) , what's the best
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Jason Lester jles...@wcs.k12.va.uswrote:
ManageEngine's NetFlow Analyzer will do most of that (not sure about AS
Path Analysis.) It is priced per monitored interface, but is pretty
reasonable for what it does. They have a 30-day demo available. We use
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Timothy Morizot tmori...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013 5:31 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
and dnssec did not save us. is there anything which could have?
Hmmm. DNSSEC wouldn't have prevented an outage. But from everything I've
seen reported, had
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
careful there may be a troll in here... :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.nyc
As of July 2, 2013, .nyc has been approved by ICANN as a
city-level top-level domain (TLD) for New York City
.nyc has been approved
Thank you for explaining this. Again, probably.
So the cities in those countries could buy them (if they could
afford them) but not the countries? So .portvila is available,
but not .vanuatu?
Yes. Country names will be part of the expansion of the ccTLD space, where
usually countries are
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
Summary: there are residual risks, but the checks and balances of the
process are likely to stop bad actors, at the cost of also stopping some
Great, Let's see what happens.
If history is any teacher...
There is not much history here to look at... .cc and .tk are ccTLDs, based
out of sovereign states. They are delegated into the root by ICANN (more
precisely by IANA, which is currently a contract also granted to ICANN) and
that's
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ted Cooper
ml-nanog0903...@elcsplace.comwrote:
On 03/07/13 11:12, Scott Weeks wrote:
As of July 2, 2013, .nyc has been approved by ICANN as a
city-level top-level domain (TLD) for New York City
Do they have DNSSEC from inception? It would seem a sensible
NRO, the RIRs collective, is still working on this. It's listed as an open
action item since Q2 this CY at NRO Executive Council meetings:
http://www.nro.net
It's very unlikely that ICANN, which sees the NRO as it's address support
organization, will move on this before NRO does.
Rubens
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Everything else remaining equal...is there a standard or expectation for
DNS reliability?
98%
99%
99.5%
99.9%
99.99%
99.999%
Measured in queries completed vs. queries lost.
Whats the consensus?
ICANN new gTLD
For those interested, we would like to share some details of this event.
It was noticed a couple weeks ago that a lack of memory conditon was
present on the NANOG servers in Chicago. Temporary measures were taken
to clear processes and restart the server, but this only temporarialy
restored
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Michael Brown mich...@supermathie.net
wrote:
On 13-12-09 01:19 PM, John Lightfoot wrote:
We don't even support IPv5 yet, so it will be a while before we support
v6.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Martin Hotze m.ho...@hotze.com wrote:
Hi,
looking at the specs of Mikrotik Cloud Core Routers it seems to be to good
to be true [1] having so much bang for the bucks. So virtually all smaller
ISPs would drop their CISCO gear for Mikrotik Routerboards.
The
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Andrew Sullivan asulli...@dyn.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:18:30AM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote:
mid term, transport area in IETF. DNS, NTP, SNMP, chargen et.al. could
trivially change to QUIC/MinimaLT
Oh, yes, it'd obviously be trivial to change DNS
What happens, if the IXP uses a 4-byte ASN? RFC5668 (4-Octet AS Specific
BGP Extended Community) defines Global Admin,4bytes:Local Admin,
2bytes.
I have been asking some IXP operators, about their practice and their
reply was 4-byte ASNs are supported by our RS. What's your experience?
Did
http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/lacnic/inicio
Website is still showing phase 0 of address depletion, but the updated
quantity means that the /9 trigger has been reached.
Rubens
Jared,
Akamai has been v6 enabled for years. Customers have choices and know best.
Isn't your network still offering both as customer choices? :-)
Making new customers dual-stack by default for the last two years would
have gone far in increasing IPv6, unless Akamai is only losing
Sports events have their rights sold on per country basis; this leads to
some fragmentation of those numbers as network X has the rights for country
1, network Y for country 2, and they account their numbers separate even if
they use the same CDN.
Considering Soccer (or Football as we non-US call
It has been just announced in LAC network operator mailing lists that the
LAC region just crossed the /10 boundary, triggering exhaustion policies
that now only allow assignments of /22 IP address blocks, either for
initial assignments or additional requests.
Next in line, ARIN region. Is
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Here's a link to a post from VZN's public policy blog, about Netflix.
Now, just as a matter of principle, I tend to assume that anything VZN
says in public is a self-serving lie based on a poor understanding of the
Real
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Brett Glass na...@brettglass.com wrote:
At 05:33 PM 7/13/2014, Tom Hill wrote:
By the way, don't think you're not going to have to pay us for all for
that dirt you're hurling...
Building new things often does involve digging up dirt. Unlike Netflix,
we'd
If Netflix were a good citizen, it would (a) let ISPs cache content; (b)
pay them
equitably for direct connections (smaller and more remote ISPs have higher
costs
per customer and should get MORE per account than Comcast, rather than
receiving
nothing); and (c) work with ISPs to develop
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Brett Glass na...@brettglass.com wrote:
At 08:48 AM 7/15/2014, Naslund, Steve wrote:
The name of the game is to decongest your network for the least amount of
money.
I disagree with some of your other points, but on this we agree. And
caching is the best
Given your expertise seems to be wireless links, you could also backhaul
using Ubiquiti Airfiber: http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/
That Ubiquiti radio reaches at most one mile reliably due to rain fade.
Most of
our links go much farther. Wireless is our specialty and we do know our
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Brett Glass na...@brettglass.com wrote:
At 11:40 AM 7/15/2014, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
Read again. You answered thinking about AirFiber 24, while he mentioned
AirFiber 5, which goes much longer.
Ah. I assumed that you were talking about the 24 GHz version
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Brett Glass na...@brettglass.com wrote:
At 12:18 PM 7/15/2014, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
If you are picky enough to prefer other radios that cost more on Mbps/$,
that's your call,
We need reliability. That particular radio wouldn't cut it. As I've
mentioned
The things that are making my life difficult at the moment include the
following:
* Government agencies attempting to impose requirements upon us and then
denying us the resources we need to fulfill them;
* Government agencies trying to dictate what users can buy rather than
allowing
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am interested to hear opinions on Mikrotik and Ubiquiti Networks routing
and switching products. I know both hardware providers are widely deployed
in WISP networks, but I am less interested in their wireless
I personally feel like at this level of traffic, A entry level of linux
server (like dell r210) with adequate domain knowledge is the best
combination. It would happily do most stuff you throw at it, if you know
how to use it. Entry level hardware solution tries to hide details from
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Denis Fondras xx...@ledeuns.net wrote:
Le 12/08/2014 17:15, Justin Wilson a écrit :
Another thing to consider is how you feel about the configuration.
Mikrotik has a more polished GUI and command subset. UBNT is still
working things out. A lot of
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point
the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
Why? Other people are better than me at
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Aaron Hopkins li...@die.net wrote:
Is it normal to bill for IPv6 service as a separate product? I was
surprised to hear from from my Akamai rep they they do:
Hi Aaron, We can add the IPV6 service to the contract at an additional
cost of $XXX/month. Please
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
No, I expect it to be part and parcel of the basic fees, as IPv4
is, which I'm happy to hear it is in this case.
Based on a response I saw in this thread earlier
There would be a root, or multiple roots, which would respond to
requests to locate who should be asked about a domain, for example if
you want to know the ip address for world.std.com the conversation
goes roughly:
(To Root Server): Where is the COM server?
(From Root Server):
1 - 100 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
