Hopefully posted soonish? Less than 3 weeks to the meeting, the early
registration window has passed and there is still no agenda.
Thanks,
--h
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Heather Schiller
Network Security - Verizon Business
1.800.900.0241secur...@verizonbusiness.com
Hey - send me what info you do have about your account and I will try to
point you in the right direction.
(Same goes for anyone else having similar v6 probs)
--Heather
-Original Message-
From: jason jeffries [mailto:jjeffr...@labs.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:57 PM
If anyone is listening, would you be so kind as to update geolocation
info for the following-- they are in Mexico, not Argentina.
inetnum: 186.64.16.176/29
status: reallocated
owner: Infor Global Solutions Mexico SA de CV
ownerid: MX-IGSM-LACNIC
responsible: Hector Garcia
Hi :)
I don't manage IP space day to day anymore.. But can get you in touch
w/ the folks who do. No promises, as I don't know what the issue is -
but I can try to help clear up any problem as well. ..and there really
isn't a panic over here, we've known it was coming for years.
--Heather
For those who don't like clicking on random bit.ly links:
http://www.ripe.net/training/material/IPv6-for-LIRs-Training-Course/IPv6
_addr_plan4.pdf
--Heather
-Original Message-
From: Nathalie Trenaman [mailto:natha...@ripe.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 5:05 AM
To:
..for some blocks I've taken over admin for.
Make sure you are visibly listed as a Point of Contact on those records in
the appropriate RIR, so that folks who get your request can verify you. Even
better, register in your RIR's RPKI program and generate a ROA for it. Info
about ARIN's
Actually, requiring a public whois record is the way it always has been, that's
only recently changed. I think most folks would agree that, IPv4 /32 :: IPv6
/128 as IPv4 /29 :: IPv6 /64 So, while you are right, that swip'ing a v4 /32
has never been required, I think your analogy of a v6 /64
Paxfire gets sued:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20768-us-internet-providers-hijacking-users-search-queries.html
http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/08/08/38796.htm
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2390529,00.asp
Paxfire files counter suit:
Hi! Now that you have my email address, ping me offline and I'll see if I can
help.
--Heather
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Heather Schiller
Network Security - Verizon Business
1.800.900.0241secur...@verizonbusiness.com
-Original Message-
From: Robert Bonomi
Or roll it up hill:
33611 looks like they get transit from 19181, who's only upstream appears to be
12189.
12189 gets connectivity from 174 and 3549.
174 = Cogent
3549 = GBLX/L3
--Heather
-Original Message-
From: Kelvin Williams [mailto:kwilli...@altuscgi.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
Looks fixed now..
--heather
-Original Message-
From: Keegan Holley [mailto:keegan.hol...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 2:50 PM
To: Schiller, Heather A
Cc: Kelvin Williams; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3
To be honest I
Sorry -- was looking at the wrong thing. Doh!
--heather
-Original Message-
From: Schiller, Heather A
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:05 PM
To: 'Keegan Holley'
Cc: Kelvin Williams; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3
Looks fixed now
AS8300 started announcing one of the Rove Digital dns changer IP ranges. (The
IP ranges the FBI is sending 'you are infected' letters about) Swisscom's
announcement is less specific than the prefixes being announced by ISC during
the remediation effort, so it's not impacting traffic... But
Sent response offlist.
--heather
-Original Message-
From: Jérôme Nicolle [mailto:jer...@ceriz.fr]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 11:55 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Reachability issue 193.56.43.0/24AS25186 from AS701
Hi,
Just changed the upstream for this network and a few
Replied off list..
--Heather
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Jones [mailto:a...@jonesy.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:45 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Requesting off-list contact from a verizon.net mail admin
If someone who looks after verizon.net mail is listening, I
Actually, it's a choice. You just tell them you want to keep your POTS when you
sign up for service. They can definitely bundle Fios TV POTS. The VOIP
package might be cheaper. I suspect that's where most people wind up, not
realizing the difference in service until there is a power outage.
It does not sound as though the original holders of the space know/care - if
they are out of business, they probably don't care. If they are actively
involved in it, then it's not a hijack. If they haven't updated their company
name/website, then it's not a hijack, just poor record keeping.
There is no such thing as Internet routers there are my routers, your
routers, and that guy over there's routers. Even if you get your ISP to route
it for you - that does not guarantee that any other network anywhere else on
the internet will accept the route. Getting your ISP to accept
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Amodio [mailto:jmamo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 1:01 PM
To: Lucy Lynch
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: on various websites, but they all forgot to enable
them on their nameservers
http://www.mrp.net/IPv6Day.html
The web
They are probably referring to this:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2533454/
The following Fix it solution will resolve the issue by configuring
your computer to prefer IPv4, instead of IPv6. By default, Windows
prefers IPv6 over IPv4. This Fix it solution is temporary, to resolve
issues on
Eventually they will be posted here:
http://nanog.org/presentations/archive/index.php
With a few exceptions -- the FCC presentation was not recorded. The
breakout sessions aren't typically recorded either.
--heather
-Original Message-
From: Krembs, Jesse
Could be this..?
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos11.2/topics/reference/configuration-statement/independent-domain-edit-routing-options.html
unrecognized transitive attributes depend on whatever code version you are
running... What's more important is how the unrecoginized
I thought AS-plain notation was the standard for 4-byte ASN's? Also to cidr
report folks, in the web version, clicking on the ASN for these takes you to
the page for AS3 (MIT)
46.18.104.0/21AS3.746
195.54.52.0/23 AS3.523
195.54.52.0/24 AS3.523
--heather
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Gray [mailto:r...@longlines.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 3:09 PM
To: Schiller, Heather A
Cc: Aftab Siddiqui; Richard Barnes; Jonas Frey (Probe Networks); nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Saudi Telecom sending route with invalid attributes
Can someone from Bing/MS contact me about correcting Geolocation info
for some IP's. Folks are erroneously getting redirected - and I can't
find any info about how to get it fixed.
Thanks,
--Heather
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Heather Schiller
Network Security - Verizon
+2 so far here.. Same email, same guy, different netblocks. Spamming
for IP's to spam with?
--heather
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Heather Schiller
Network Security - Verizon Business
1.800.900.0241secur...@verizonbusiness.com
-Original Message-
From: Crist
We do not charge v4 customers anything to turn up an IPv6 tunnel. If
you hear otherwise, please feel free to drop me a line. Native v6 is
available in atleast 31 markets, on over 210 edge devices in 701. There
is a good chance that native v6 is available for most, or close enough
to rehome
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 5:12 PM
To: Franck Martin
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption
On 10/18/2010 3:51 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
So they can't run their own services from home and
14/8 isn't all they are using internally.. 1,4,5,42 and that's just the
stuff that hasn't been delegated out by IANA yet.
I am sure this practice is pervasive.. and it's an issue that doesn't
typically come up in talks about prepping for IPv4 depletion. Maybe it
will now..
FWIW, I don't
Might want to double check you aren't filtering, as parts of 1/8 and 2/8
have been intermittently announced by RIR's in debogonizing efforts over
the last few months. Routing wise, this really isn't different from the
space being assigned - better to clear up any filtering and identify
routing
ARIN Region IPv6 fee waiver:
https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html#waivers
In Jan 2008, the Board of Trustees decided to reduce the fee waiver
incrementally over a period of 4 years. Full fees will be in effect in
2012.
Can you provide rationalization why anyone should automatically get
-Original Message-
From: Joe Greco [mailto:jgr...@ns.sol.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:14 PM
To: John Payne
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
On Apr 8, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
IPv6-only content won't be meaningful for
32 matches
Mail list logo
