Nobody said a Moratel customer announced a Google prefix, they said the
issue was within Moratel.
This is a really good article that explains the issue in detail, maybe read
it again?
http://blog.cloudflare.com/why-google-went-offline-today-and-a-bit-about
Steve
On 7 November 2012 05:07, Jian
FYI RIPE reallocated these blocks. Whilst I understand they didn't want the
court order, this seems a bit silly, doesn't that now make the machines
residing in these blocks special - even if the owners arent miscreants, it
makes them a viable target.
Hmm I find this topic quite interesting.
First is the belief that the Internet will suddenly break on the day when the
last IP block is allocated by an RIR - the fact that most of the v4 space is
currently not being announced may mean we have many years before there are real
widespread
multihoming is simple, you get an address block and route it to your upstreams.
the policy surrounding that is another debate, possibly for another group
this thread is discussing how v4 to v6 migration can operate on a network level
Steve
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 01:37:23PM +, Christian
BlackBerry.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:55:06
To:Christian Kuhtz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:Andy Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Donald Stahl
[EMAIL PROTECTED], nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: The Choice
On 27 Nov 2007, at 14:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the recent drop in list traffic which coincides with Martin
Hannigan's campaign of stern warning letters to various people, I
wonder
whether things are heading in the right direction.
were they deserved? (I honestly have no
On 29 Jan 2008, at 15:57, Steve Gibbard wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Pete Templin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And seriously, can we stop with the if you don't like it, you must
volunteer to serve on it to effect your desired changes mantra?
Why? The people who
On 28 Feb 2008, at 08:32, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Martin Hannigan wrote:
Do folks think that we ought to do a charter amendment to allow for
permanent bans? That seems like a huge issue and that we may want to
get an up or down vote. The way we would address it is either adding
it as a power of
8 matches
Mail list logo